Proofs of Absolute Motion 3/3 (original) (raw)
Related papers
The General Science Journal, 2024
The empirical detection of gravitational waves leads to the conclusion that physical space must be a real physical object. And from this reality it is concluded that motion through physical space must be absolute, being possible to deduce vectorially the absolute velocities from the observed relative velocities.
Absolute Motion: Anathema or Reality
The General Science Journal, 2024
This paper includes several arguments that confront the absolute nature with the relative nature of motion, an old problem that for the reasons given here, and in spite of the absolutely prevailing relativism, is not properly resolved.
A Thought Experiment on Absolute Motion
The General Science Journal, 2023
This short article gives some formal and physical reasons why it would be convenient to reconsider the possibility of Newtonian absolute motion.
Philosophy, physics and mathematics of relative and absolute motion
The idea of motion includes propagation of signals in a given medium and motion of a physical bodies (including observers) relative to the same medium. Combinations of various types of motion lead to many phenomena detectable and hidden from the observer's point of view. Usually, light offers the most mysterious way of motion regarding the observer. To reveal the truth and eliminate the mystery, we need to use another sophisticated way of imagination and experimentation to reach a clear view on the fundamental processes of motion despite all illusions, old ideas and wrong postulates.
viXra, 2017
The theory of relativity’s concept o motion suggests that every observer must assume that his own frame of reference is always at rest; therefore, he must ascertain the state of the motion of all other entities in relation to his own frame of reference. In this article, we have shown that for every entity its own frame of reference actually behaves as if it is in the state of the absolute rest. Therefore, the motion of an entity has to be ascertained in relation to its own frame of reference. Thus, we have made only a slight but very significant change in the proposal of the theory of relativity. Our proposal is based on actual observations of how things behave.
The Thomistic Theory of the Motion Principle
This paper proves the compatibility of the motion principle of philosophical physics that (everything moved is moved by another) and the postulate of Newtonian mechanics that is the principle of inertia (Every body perseveres either in its state of resting or of moving uniformly in a direction, unless that is compelled to change its state by impressed forces).
The Argument from Motion Revisited
2018
I present and defend several formulations of the Aristotelian argument from motion, according to which the reality of change in the physical world ultimately requires the existence of a sustaining source of all change, a reality which can impart to all things the power to change and to undergo change, but which cannot itself be subject to change or undergo change. Second, I defend the Aristotelian project from a number of objections, including the viability of Aristotle's argument in light of challenges from modern physics, such as the challenge of inertial motion and special relativity. Finally, I show that an unchanging cause of all change must be such as to possess the attributes definitive of the God of classical theism.
The Metaphysical Roots of Cartesian Physics: the Law of Rectilinear Motion
This paper presents a detailed account of Descartes' derivation of his second law of nature-the law of rectilinear motion-from a priori metaphysical principles. Unlike the other laws the proof of the second depends essentially on a metaphysical assumption about the temporal immediacy of God's operation. Recent commentators (e.g., Des Chene and Garber) have not adequately explained the precise role of this assumption in the proof and Descartes' reasoning has continued to seem somewhat arbitrary as a result. My account better reveals the dependence of the second law on fundamental principles about time and causality.
In the present paper, using a coordinate free, topological analysis based on the Brouwer fixed point theorem, we show the existence of a preferred or absolute reference frame, and hence the existence of an absolute motion. The mathematical definitions of an absolute reference and an absolute motion are given. We also give, the first in science, a mathematical, topology based definition of an absolute space. The result of this work is new and it is of principal significance for the very foundations of physics.