Conceptual Bases of the İmpact of Ethnic Conflicts on Regional and İnternational Security (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Internationalization of Ethnic Conflict: State, Society, and Synthesis
International Studies Review, 2009
The purpose of this review is to identify a framework for understanding the internationalization of ethnic conflict. We examine three approaches that purport to explain escalation-namely extension, interaction, and transformation-and emphasize the fact that each theory by itself lacks full explanatory power. Synthesis that focuses on factors from state and society, which shape the decision to become involved in ethnic strife is essential. Examination of the preceding factors reveals that institutional configurations and ethnic composition indeed do limit future options available to states and influence the distribution of capabilities among leaders of groups. The main conclusion of this essay is that ethnic diversity in a society and high constraint on state action are optimal conditions for overcoming insecurity.
Exploring the Significance of Ethnicity in Contemporary Conflicts
International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 2023
In recent years, the international system has seen remarkable transformations in contrast to historical periods marked by nations involved in armed conflicts. Since the development of multilateral organisations and the recognition of globally accepted borders, the incidence of interstate conflicts has experienced a notable decline. Nevertheless, there has been a significant surge in the frequency of intrastate disputes, reaching an unparalleled magnitude. A significant proportion of present-day conflicts consist of intrastate wars, wherein a sovereign state becomes involved in acts of hostility within its own territorial boundaries. Although it can be contended that influential and burgeoning states with vested interests employ surrogate actors and engage in international interventions as a means to interfere in intrastate conflicts, however, upon careful consideration of the multitude of factors involved, it becomes evident that the key catalysts for the creation of intrastate conflicts are ethnic prejudices prevalent within states. The article aims to contend that ethno-nationalist conflicts served as the principal instigators of hostilities. It presents a comprehensive examination of the fundamental elements that contribute to interstate conflicts, as well as the distinguishing features of a recent war in contemporary political history primarily influenced by ethnic divisions. In other words, the piece aims to analyse the importance of ethnicity in contemporary conflicts and investigate various explanatory elements, such as religious ideologies, racial disparities, political dynamics, and economic and resource-related considerations.
Ethnic Identities and Conflict
Conflicts between ethnic groups are one of the most destructive and devastating forms of conflicts. In the beginning of the Third millennium the world and humankind are still suffering due to conflicts between ethnic groups. Sudan, Rwanda, Yugoslavia, UK-Northern Ireland, Spain, Sri Lanka, and Turkey are some of current examples of these conflicts that caused mass human rights violation and loss of human lives and strained economy and damaged the environment. Therefore preventing conflicts is an important issue that must be addressed and studied. This paper aims to examine, first, ethnicity, ethnicity making situations, causes and forms of ethnic conflicts. Second, it explores what are the main features of ethnic conflict prevention, what is the conflict prevention approach of EU and how EU functions in conflicts. Finally the study concludes that establishing a minority rights protection system is the most effective and humanitarian way to prevent ethnic conflicts.
In the international arena with increasing the differentiation between groups in terms of politics, economics and ideologies, people began to try to reflect their own culture, language and so on in specific region which was they lived area. In the mid-20 th century, the term " ethnicity " as it is used today replacing terminology of " races " or " nations " used for the concept of in the 19 th century. Especially in the post-Cold War period has witnessed a number of ethnically-informed secessionist movements, predominantly within the former communist states. After the decline of Soviet Union, numbers of the multi-ethnic societies increased within different nations and then we began to see differentiations as a term of ethnic conflict that escalated to violence and civil war. In this study, my paper will focus on the term of " Ethnic Conflict " and the case of conflicts between South Caucasus and Abkhaz.
Beyond Ethnicity: The Global Comparative Analysis of Ethnic Conflict
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 2004
Conflicts that are reported as being between ethnic groups are often described as "ethnic conflicts." The implication is that such conflicts belong to a general type of ethnic conflict with certain repeated and predictable features. This type of conflict is seen as being motivated by ethnic sentiments, as being grounded in deeply set hatreds, and as being virtually inescapable. By applying the epithet "ethnic," it is as if the conflict were already explained. However, there are many reasons to be suspicious of these implications. Ethnic groups presently embroiled in fierce conflict may have been, at a previous point in time, peacefully co-existent. Frequently, the very lines of ethnic difference become blurred through intermarriage and cultural change. Therefore, in order to understand conflict described as "ethnic" we need to uncover the reasons why (in a given conflict situation) there is heightened awareness of ethnic difference. Then we need to explain what I have termed "the conditions of ethnicity," that is, the external conditions which lead to severe conflict; and those external circumstances that make it likely that the conflict will follow lines of ethnic differentiation. Two of these conditions are the strength of the state system and the ability of the state to manage ethnic conflict.
Ethnic Conflict: A Multidimensional Examination
researchgate, 2023
Ethnic conflict, characterized by a clash between two or more ethnic groups, has been a persistent and pervasive issue throughout human history. While the roots of such conflict can be traced to diverse sources such as politics, socioeconomic disparities, or religious differences, the ultimate catalyst often lies in the struggle for dominance or recognition within a societal structure. This paper aims to explore the multifaceted nature of ethnic conflicts through various scholarly lenses, namely, primordialism, instrumentalist, and constructivist perspectives, and to examine the interplay of top-down or bottom-up factors in these conflicts.
Main apporaches to the definition of ethnic conflicts
The article touches the major theoretical approaches in definition of the ethnic conflict in political sciences, providing theories of American, European, Russian and Kazakhstani experts. It briefly observes the first theses and the development of ethnic conflict theory, emphasizing on the differences between Soviet and Western approaches to the problem, which resulted in dramatic tension and bloodshed in the territory of former Soviet Union. The goal of the research is to compare the main approaches to the theory of ethnic conflict and to provide its own vision of the topic, taking into account the current ethnicity-based tensions and apprehension in the region, including
The sociology of ethnic conflicts: comparative international perspectives
Oppositions and deadly conflicts among ethnic collectivities are important around the world. Ethnies (our term for ethnic groups) also strongly affect interstate relations. Both interethnic and ethnic-state conflicts tend to be severe, protracted, and intractable. At the extremes, the stakes are total: survival versus genocide. Competition and rivalry for individualized economic and political goods are important, but the most intense conflicts are to be expected when the stakes are collective goods, including categorical claims to prestige and political authority. States are major actors in creating, accentuating, or diminishing ethnic identities. States are both arenas of rivalry and conflict and resources for ethnic mobilization and counter-mobilization. Because both ethnies and states are diverse, careful specification is required for fruitful analysis. The same dictum applies for the diverse types of oppositions and of conflicts. Ethnic conflicts arise from complex combinations of ethnic strength, class, inequality, political opportunity, mobilization resources, interdependence, and international interventions. Frequent but nonviolent protests, for example, are most likely by organized collectivities with substantial resources, operating in relatively open political systems. International aid to parties in domestic conflicts appears to prolong and intensify ethnic struggles. Research in this field contends with many difficulties, and one-sided theories do not fare well. Yet abundant descriptive materials are available, statistical techniques are improving, conceptual clarification continues, and substantive knowledge does accumulate. Accordingly, there is hope for better understanding of some of the most destructive and tragic conflicts of our times.