Power and responsibility: Advertising selfâregulation and consumer protection in a digital world (original) (raw)
Related papers
Self-Regulation of Online Advertising: A Lesson From a Failure
An attempt in Israel to establish a regime of industry self-regulation of online advertising has failed. While the immediate reason was the disapproval of the Israeli Government's Antitrust Commissioner , we employ a questionnaire of industry representatives and a survey of 527 students to expose a significant gap between the views of the industry representatives and public positions regarding online advertising regulation. While the industry supports self-regulation of technical aspects of online advertising, the public prefers co-regulation of both technical aspects as well as the content of online advertising. The article suggests that in order to become accepted and practical, a new regulatory regime in the Internet arena should be adopted, via a co-regulatory rather than self-regulatory mode.
Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2000
Advertising is the most visible element of modern marketing, and an important component of trading. It is also an activity often accused by its critics of being intrusive and pervasive. Such accusations are not easily refuted by a worldwide industry which spends billions of dollars each year reaching and persuading its target markets through daily bombardment of thousands of ads in most developed countries. When advertising does offend, mislead, or is untruthful, a structure needs to be in place in order to provide protection to all parties and, in most cases, a country's legal system is complemented by a self-regulatory scheme. Self-regulation is a common approach to controlling conduct or behaviour in society and, indeed, Australian advertisers have opted for this system of control for more than 60 years.
Journal of Business Ethics, 2017
The theory and practice of advertising self-regulation have been evolving for decades in pursuit of basic standards for advertising quality. In Spain, this discipline was put into practice in 1995, the year the Association for the Self-Regulation of Commercial Communication (Autocontrol) was created. This article aims to examine in depth the functioning of the Spanish advertising self-regulation (ASR) system, with special emphasis on the Advertising Jury, and explore to what extent some of the normative requirements of rigour, independence, and participation can be considered to have been met. The paper is based on a case study in which interviews with Autocontrol members, Jury members and consumer associations have particular bearing. The results shed light on the achievements of Autocontrol's self-regulation work and the challenges it still faces.
Mediterranian Journal of Communication, 2019
In the light of the growth of influencer marketing, this descriptive and analytical study pursues the following three objectives: first, to identify and describe the legal and ethical boundaries of this advertising practice; second, to assess its supervision on the basis of case law and resolutions of the Spanish advertising selfregulation system; third, to identify the role advertising self-regulation could play to guarantee consumer protection in accordance with the actions performed by two leading advertising markets, the United States and the United Kingdom. The results show: the absence of published specific regulation or codes of ethics around advertising practice in Spain; the absence of case law or self-regulation resolutions around compliance with the principle of advertising identification; finally, the crucial role selfregulation can and must play in raising awareness among advertisers, influencers and the audience regarding the necessary identification of this advertising practice, promoting the commitment and co-responsibility of the parties, and involving them in the monitoring and control process of possible infringements.
Australasian Marketing Journal (amj), 2001
The regulation of advertising is a controversial and difficult process. Over the past three decades, two attempts have been made in Australia to produce more acceptable ads. This paper reviews these systems using a macro framework for analysis which contextualises advertising in society. The systems have the fundamental process of handling complaints about advertising in common, however there are advantages and disadvantages of each and these are discussed. Important insights for the development of regulation of advertising are presented together with critical implications for the future of the industry.
Advertising agency engagement and regulatory empowerment in the world of new media
This paper examines how new media has impacted advertiser behaviours in relation to controversial advertising. This research seeks to explore the extent of advertiser engagement and regulatory empowerment in a new media environment, where an advertiser can show offensive advertising online via new media despite a ban by the self regulatory body in relation to traditional media. Specifically, we conduct ten interviews with members of the advertising industry to develop an understanding of this engagement and empowerment. Findings suggest that advertisers are very aware that new media creates an opportunity for engagement, however, feedback is interpreted subjectively to rationalise continued dissemination of offensive advertising messages and therein advertisers are empowered.
Advertising Self-regulation. A comparative analysis between the United Kingdom and Spain
Based on the criteria and parameters considered decisive by the European Union for an effective self-regulation model in advertising, this work carries out a comparative analysis between the advertising self-regulation systems in the United Kingdom and Spain. Setting the British system as a benchmark due to its effectiveness, the main objective of the study is to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the Spanish system in terms of independence, effectiveness, funding