The Emerging Asymmetrical Islamic Fundamentalist World Revolution & Takeover of the International Systems (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Rise of the Islamic State and the War for a New World Order
This paper presents the logic of modern systems theory and explains how and why this theoretical perspective can assist IR in better understanding the hegemonic potential of religious actors. Substantively, it advances the notion that a systemically relevant function within world society is one that attempts to achieve " communicative hegemony. " As an organization of the religious system, the Islamic State advances its unique religious program, which brings it into conflict with religious and non-religious actors. In this functional sense, the Islamic State is no less systemically relevant, and therefore no less legitimate an international actor, than the United States or other political organizations.
"ISLAMIC STATE" THE NEW GLOBAL JIHADIST PHENOMENON (Book)
TOMÉ, Luis (Ed.) (2015). “Islamic State” – the new global jihadist phenomenon. Formalpress/Media XXI, 2015
“Introduction”(pp. 9-18); “Chap. 3. The international expansion of the self-proclaimed “Caliphate” (pp. 65-92); e “Final Remarks – A global threat to fight in a very sensitive geopolitical chessboard” (pp. 235-243).
The future of Muslim politics:: Critique of the [] fundamentalist'theory of the Islamic state
Futures, 1991
This article considers the future of Muslim political thought in the context of growing de-lslamization and the dominance of western institutions. The 'fundamentalist' theory of the Islamic state-total mobilization of Muslim societies under a universal state-is criticized as religiously an immanentist heresy, and politically a totalitarian nightmare. Proposed here is a way out of the moral and intellectual crisis in Islamic political thought through the principle of Shura meaning that Muslims must evolve their own form of representative government. The ever-increasing integration of traditional cultures into a global meta-system, whose all-important socioeconomic and moral-political institutions are firmly under the control of western powers, has created a surge of political activism among the marginalized peoples of the world. Even Muslim ideologues, the traditional ulema, have reacted against the continued erosion of Islamic identity, which is the ultimate consequence of western dominance, by producing their own battle-cry of 'back to the Islamic state'. Only a total mobilization of Muslim societies under the banner of a universal state, they have argued, will stem the rising tide of de-lslamization and generate power for the declining polity of Islam. Without doubt, the 'fundamentalist' vision of Islam as state introduces radical, indeed heretical, ideas in the religious doctrine. And yet, ever since the vague notion of an ideological Islamic state was presented earlier this century, Muslim political thought has become totally mesmerized by the mystique of the state. In the concept of the Islamic state, it claims to have discovered not only an authentic norm of historical criticism but also the insight that the state constitutes an indispensable principle of order in Islam without which the law, indeed the faith itself, does not come to fruition.
Cultural Crossroads in the Middle East The Historical, Cultural and Political Legacy of Intercultural Dialogue and Confl ict from the Ancient Near East to the Present Day, 2019
This paper makes the claim that the current spread of Islamic extremism which caused the emergence of the Islamic State (IS) is not so much a result of Western-Islamic civilizational enmity as the outcome of local ethnic and religious rivalries in which external powers intervened. Political developments in the Middle East over the last 35-40 years which have sometimes been followed by external interventions have reinforced religiously motivated political rivalries (i.e., between Saudi Arabia and Iran) and facilitated the spread of Islamic extremism based on the politiciza-tion of Islam. The emergence of the Islamic State has had a significant impact not only on the Middle Eastern regional security environment but also on the global international system. The IS, a new type of international actor, manifests neither a traditional model of the modern state nor a typical terrorist network with restricted political goals. Based on the historical narrative of the Caliphate, it claims to have authority over the entire Islamic world and intends to establish its supranational authority through affiliated organizations. As the IS is not capable of any kind of mutual relations other than war, other states will hardly recognize them as a part of the international system.
Islamic ideology's challenge to the discipline of International Relations
This paper articulates one of the key challenges between Political Islam and traditional International Relations, that is, the dichotomy between the state and umma construct. The relationship between umma and state is a lens through which we analyse the way in which the International Relations (IR) discipline struggles to account for alternative theories. First the paper places Political Islam or Islamism, the pursuit of politics on the basis of Islamic norms, in the context of ideologies. In doing so we distinguish between Islamism or Political Islam the ideology, and Islam the faith. With regards to IR we will explore how ideology is perceived in the dominant, neorealist structure of IR as a tool of the state, and then compare this to the more important status afforded to ideas in constructivist theory. The paper then moves to define one of the key features of Political Islam, the umma social construct, and summarises the points of contention between it and the state. Political Islam will be shown to be lacking in its conception of state-to-state interaction, its focus primarily on the domestic sphere. Following this the paper does not ask of Political Islam what it can do to accommodate the state in IR theory but rather, what can IR do to accommodate the umma. In doing so, we critique the IR discipline"s inability to satisfactorily deal with alternative theories.
Islamisation of the Muslim World
Feminist Dissent, 2016
Through the erasure of cultural practices and a denial of the diversity of Muslims and Islamic practices across the world, Islamists are reinforcing their world view and creating a homogenous, monolithic Muslim identity, an identity in which culture and history are to be separated from Islam and Islamic practice, in which there is no space for ethnic or tribal identities, and where national, regional and local boundaries are irrelevant. This is a world in which only the boundaries of the Ummah (Muslim world) count, where there is only one law, religious law (Sharia), and in which an identity in which the separation of religion and state is heretical. The religious community is the state, the Ummah is the community, every aspect of one's life is circumscribed by religion and women, their lives and their bodies are the battleground. Anything that does not fit with their world view is simply swept away as not Islamic. Their message and teachings are spread through extensive use of social media, satellite broadcast channels, podcasts, conferences and events, local religious bookshops, study circles, mosques and the establishment of Islamic institutions including schools and Sharia courts. In this article I equate Islamism with Salafis i , 'a term which literally means predecessors but in the Islamic context means those who follow the practices of the
The international order and the persistence of ‘violent extremism’ in the Islamic world
Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2016
This article explores the relation between the American-led liberal international order and the persistence of ‘violent extremism’ in the Middle East through a questioning of the role of constitutive aspects of this order, namely territoriality of political organization and capitalist organization of world economy, in contributing to the persistence and recurrent formation of militant Islamist groups. It argues that the historical legitimation crisis of this international order in the Middle East and the other conflict-ridden regions of the Islamic world, and the current globalization of this legitimation crisis in the relatively well-off and democratic states of the western world, contribute to the recurrent explosions of alienation, expressed in the form of militant Islamist groups.
The discourse of Islamic Revolution in International Relations
During the twentieth century, the world is watching developments, the opposite effect and at the same time was remarkable. So that the scale of the developments, by itself, are equal the events of the last century. World Wars, revolutions and conflicts and clashes between communities, are the most important developments in the nineteenth century. Despite the importance of some of these developments, they had limited impacts, but some others, while maintaining the internal dynamics of their evolution, a wide variety of processes have impressed the international system. In this context, the Islamic Revolution alongside the collapse of the Soviet Union including events that had a significant impact on the international system and inner elements in the international system have been deeply affected. The Islamic revolution in Iran, have value system is rooted in the beliefs of Islam; that bases its behavior in some cases is consistent with international rules and norms and in some contexts is disagreement with them. Islamic Revolution for themselves; responsibility, commitment and gives a special role in the world; that to challenge the structure of the international system and on its effects. In fact, this revolution, to challenged distribution of power and international relations actors and cause to strengthen and the emergence of the new State and transnational actors in the international structure and is affected by the evolution of the concepts of justice, peace, and security. So of the present research, Intends to study the effects of the Islamic revolution on the developments in the international system.
The Muslim World between Internal Threats and External Challenges
2 Preamble 'The idea of Islamic renewal which understands Islam as capable, not only of educating human beings but also of ordering the world, will always have two types of people as its opponents: conservatives who want the old forms, and modernists who want someone else's forms. The former drag Islam back into the past, the latter push it towards an alien future' 1 …. 'Starting from the viewpoint that Islam is merely a religion, conservative would conclude that Islam should not and progressives that it cannot organize the external world. The practical result is the same' 2 – Alijah Izetbegovic 'The Islamic Declaration', Sarajevo 1970 (Jumada-l-Awwal 1390)