Specific mutations in the estrogen receptor change the properties of antiestrogens to full agonists (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2013
A ligand-dependent nuclear transcription factor, ERα has two transactivating functional domains (AF), AF-1 and AF-2. AF-1 is localized in the N-terminal region, and AF-2 is distributed in the C-terminal ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the ERα protein. Helix 12 (H12) in the LBD is a component of the AF-2, and the configuration of H12 is ligand-inducible to an active or inactive form. We demonstrated previously that the ERα mutant (AF2ER) possessing L543A,L544A mutations in H12 disrupts AF-2 function and reverses antagonists such as fulvestrant/ICI182780 (ICI) or 4-hydoxytamoxifen (OHT) into agonists in the AF2ER knock-in mouse. Our previous in vitro studies suggested that the mode of AF2ER activation is similar to the partial agonist activity of OHT for WT-ERα. However, it is still unclear how antagonists activate ERα. To understand the molecular mechanism of antagonist reversal activity, we analyzed the correlation between the ICI-dependent estrogen-responsive element-mediated transc...
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2000
The estrogen receptor (ER) suppresses transcriptional activity of the RelA subunit of nuclear factor-B in a hormone-dependent manner by a mechanism involving both the receptor DNA binding domain and ligand binding domain (LBD). In this study we examine the role of the ER LBD in mediating ligand-dependent RelA transrepression. Both ER␣ and ER inhibit RelA in response to 17-estradiol but not in the presence of antihormones. We have identified residues within the ER␣ LBD that are responsible for receptor dimerization and show that dimerization is necessary for transactivation and transrepression. Moreover we have generated mutant receptors that have lost their ability to inhibit RelA but retain their capacity to stimulate transcription and conversely mutants that are transcriptionally defective but capable of antagonizing RelA. Overexpression of p160 and cAMP-response element-binding protein-binding protein/p300 co-activators failed to relieve repression of RelA, which is consistent with the demonstration that RelA inhibition can occur independently of these co-activators. These findings suggest it is unlikely that sequestration of these cofactors required for ER transcriptional activation can account for hormone-dependent antagonism of RelA. The identification of ER mutants that discriminate between transactivation and transrepression implies that distinct surfaces within the LBD are involved in mediating these two receptor functions.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990
Many estrogen-antagonist and -agonist ligands have been synthesized, some of which have proved clinically important in the treatment of hormone-dependent breast tumors and endocrine disorders. Here we show that the "pure"l antiestrogen ICI 164,384 inhibits mouse estrogen receptor-DNA binding in vitro. The effects of this steroid on DNA binding can be overcome by addition of an anti-receptor antibody whose epitope lies N-terminal to the receptor DNAbinding domain. Since this antibody is also capable of restoring DNA-binding activity to receptor mutants that either lack the dimerization domain or bear deleterious mutations within it, we propose that ICI 164,384 reduces DNA binding by interfering with receptor dimerization. In contrast, when complexed with the antagonist/partial agonist tamoxifen, the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
The estrogen receptor (ER) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor containing two transcriptional activation domains. AF-1 is in the N terminus of the receptor protein and AF-2 activity is dependent on helix 12 of the C-terminal ligand-binding domain. Two point mutations of leucines 543 and 544 to alanines (L543A, L544A) in helix 12 minimized estrogen-dependent transcriptional activation and reversed the activity of the estrogen antagonists ICI182780 (ICI) and tamoxifen (TAM) into agonists in a similar manner that TAM activated WT ERα through AF-1 activation. To evaluate the physiological role of AF-1 and AF-2 for the tissueselective function of TAM, we generated an AF-2-mutated ERα knock-in (AF2ERKI) mouse model. AF2ERKI homozygote female mice have hypoplastic uterine tissue and rudimentary mammary glands similar to ERα-KO mice. Female mice were infertile as a result of anovulation from hemorrhagic cystic ovaries and elevated serum LH and E2 levels, although the mutant ERα protein is expressed in the AF2ERKI model. The AF2ERKI phenotype suggests that AF-1 is not activated independently, even with high serum E2 levels. ICI and TAM induced uterotropic and ER-mediated gene responses in ovariectomized AF2ERKI female mice in the same manner as in TAM-and E2-treated WT mice. In contrast, ICI and TAM did not act as agonists to regulate negative feedback of serum LH or stimulate pituitary prolactin gene expression in a different manner than TAM-or E2-treated WT mice. The functionality of the mutant ERα in the pituitary appears to be different from that in the uterus, indicating that ERα uses AF-1 differently in the uterus and the pituitary for TAM action.
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1996
The human estrogen receptor (ER) is a ligand-inducible transcription factor that contains two transcriptional activation functions, one located in the NH 2-terminal region of the protein (AF-1) and the second in the COOH-terminal region (AF-2). Antiestrogens, such as trans-hydroxytamoxifen (TOT), have partial agonistic activity in certain cell types, and studies have implied that this agonism is AF-1-dependent. We have made progressive NH 2-terminal and other segment deletions and ligations in the A/B domain, and studied the transcriptional activity of these mutant ERs in ER-negative MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer and HEC-1 human endometrial cancer cells. Using several estrogens and several partial agonist/antagonist antiestrogens, we find that estrogens and antiestrogens require different regions of AF-1 for transcriptional activation. Deletion of the first 40 amino acids has no effect on receptor activity. Antiestrogen agonism is lost upon deletion to amino acid 87, while estrogen agonism is not lost until deletions progress to amino acid 109. Antiestrogen agonism has been further defined to require amino acids 41-64, as deletion of only these amino acids results in an ER that exhibits 100% activity with E 2 , but no longer shows an agonist response to TOT. With A/B-modified receptors in which antiestrogens lose their agonistic activity, the antiestrogens then function as pure estrogen antagonists. Our studies show that in these cellular contexts, hormonedependent transcription utilizes a range of the amino acid sequence within the A/B domain. Furthermore, the agonist/antagonist balance and activity of antiestrogens such as TOT are determined by specific sequences within the A/B domain and thus may be influenced by differences in levels of specific factors that interact with these regions of the ER.
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1993
Stunmary-We have used affinity labeling, site-directed mutagenesis and regional chemical mutagenesis in order to determine regions of the human estrogen receptor (ER) important in hormone binding, ligand discrimination between estrogens and antiestrogens, and transcriptional activation. Affinity labeling studies with the antiestrogen, tamoxifen aziridine and the estrogen, ketononestrol aziridine have identified cysteine 530 in the ER hormone binding domain as the primary site of labeling. In the absence of a cysteine at 530 (i.e. C530A mutant), C381 becomes the site of estrogen-competible tamoxifen aziridine labeling. Hence these two residues, although far apart in the primary linear sequence of the ER protein, must be close in the three-dimensional structure of the protein, in the ER iigand binding pocket, so that the ligand can reach either site. Site-directed mutagenesis of selected residues in the ER and region-specific chemical mutagenesis of the ER hormone binding domain with initial phenotypic screening in yeast have enabled the identification of a region near C530 important in discrimination between estrogens and antiestrogens and of other residues important in hormone-dependent transcriptional activation. Some ER mutants with alterations in the carboxy-terminal portion of the hormone binding domain are transcriptionally inactive yet bind hormone and also function as potent dominant negative ERs, suppressing the activity of wild-type ER at low concentrations. These studies reveal a separation of the hormone binding and transcription activation functions of the ER. They are also beginning to provide a more detailed picture of the ER hormone binding domain and amino acids important in ligand binding and discrimination between different categories of agonist and antagonist ligands. Such information will be important in the design of maximally effective antiestrogens. In addition, since there is now substantial evidence for a mixture of wild-type and variant ERs in breast cancers, our studies should provide insight about the bioactivities of these variant receptors and their roles in modulating the activity of wild type ER, and should lead to a better understanding of the possible role of variant receptors in altered response or resistance to antiestrogen and endocrine therapy in breast cancer. In addition, some dominant negative receptors may prove useful in examining ER mechanisms of action and in suppressing the estrogen-dependent growth of breast cancer cells.
Endocrine Related Cancer, 2008
A number of studies have reported on the unusual pharmacological behavior of type I antiestrogens, such as tamoxifen. These agents display mixed agonist/antagonist activity in a dose-, cell-, and tissue-specific manner. Consequently, many efforts have been made to develop so-called 'pure' antiestrogens that lack mixed agonist/antagonist activity. The recent report of the structure of estrogen receptor (ER) b with a second molecule of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (HT) bound in the coactivator-binding surface of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) represents the first direct example of a second ER ligand-binding site and provides insight into the possible origin of mixed agonist/antagonist activity of type I antiestrogens. In this review, we summarize the biological reports leading up to the structural conformation of a second ER ligand-binding site, compare the ERb LBD structure bound with two HT molecules to other ER structures, and discuss the potential for small molecular inhibitors designed to directly inhibit ER-coactivator and, more generally, nuclear receptor (NR)-coactivator interactions. The studies support a departure from the traditional paradigm of drug targeting to the ligand-binding site, to that of a rational approach targeting a functionally important surface, namely the NR coactivator-binding (activation function-2) surface. Furthermore, we provide evidence supporting a reevaluation of the strict interpretation of the agonist/antagonist state with respect to the position of helix 12 in the NR LBD. Endocrine-Related Cancer (2008) 15 851-870 Background Estrogen biology is exceedingly complex and important in the development and function of numerous tissues and physiological phenomena. Estrogen receptor (ER) a and b proteins display ubiquitous yet differential expression in many tissues, including adipose, adrenal,
Cancer Research, 2000
The active metabolite of tamoxifen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), is used in the laboratory for mechanistic studies of antiestrogen action. This compound binds to the estrogen receptor ␣ (ER) and silences activating function 2 (AF2) in the ligand binding domain, but activating function 1 (AF1) at the other end of the ER remains constitutive and is considered to be ligand independent. Amino acid D351 in the ligand binding domain appears to be critical for interactions with the antiestrogenic side chain of antiestrogens. We have devised an assay to evaluate the biological activity of 351 mutant ERs and antiestrogens at the transforming growth factor ␣ (TGF␣) gene in situ (J. I. MacGregor Schafer et al., Cancer Res., 59: 4308 -4313, 1999). The substitution of glycine for aspartate at position 351 results in the conversion of the 4-OHT:ER complex from estrogen-like to completely antiestrogenic. In cells stably expressing D351G ER, the ER retains responsiveness to estradiol (E 2 ) and also retains antiestrogenic responsiveness to both raloxifene and ICI 182,780. The relative binding affinity of E 2 for D351G ER (0.77 ؎ 0.17 ؋ 10 ؊9 M) is comparable with wild-type ER (0.42 ؎ 0.08 ؋ 10 ؊9 M). In addition, the D351G ER retains the ability to bind SRC-1 in the presence of E 2 , thus D351G ER AF2 activity has not been compromised. We also used a cell line stably expressing an ER with a triple mutation in helix 12 (D538A, E542A, and D545A) that ablated AF2 activity, which resulted in decreased effects of E 2 , suggesting that both AF1 and AF2 activity are required for maximal estrogen activity in MDA-MB-231 cells. Interestingly, the triple mutation also completely reduced the estrogen-like actions of 4-OHT. We propose that a specific mutation at amino acid 351 can allosterically silence AF1 in the 4-OHT:ER complex by either preventing the binding of coactivators or encouraging the binding of a corepressor molecule. We suggest that the 4-OHT-specific site responsible for estrogen-like actions can be referred to as AF2b. This binding site would consist of at least four carboxylic acids at amino acids 351 and 538, 542 and 545 in helix 12 to permit coactivator docking for gene activation. The AF2b site is distinct from AF2 for E 2 action. Further studies will provide insight into the estrogen-like actions of tamoxifen in select tissues and breast tumors and identify a significant mechanism of drug resistance to tamoxifen.
Estrogen receptor action through target genes with classical and alternative response elements
Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2000
The estrogen receptors alpha and beta (ERα and ERβ) mediate the changes in gene expression from physiological and environmental estrogens. Early studies identified classical estrogen response elements (EREs) in the promoter region of target genes whose expression is regulated by estrogen and to which the ERs bind via their DNA-binding domain (DBD). EREs in the pituitary prolactin promoter, for example, mediate an activation by both ERα and ERβ albeit with different affinities for different ligands. Full activation in most cell types requires the integrity of the activation function 2 (AF-2) in the receptors ligand binding domain (LBD), which is engaged by estrogens and disengaged by tamoxifen, raloxifene, and other antiestrogens. However, in some cells and ERE contexts, the AF-1 in the ERα amino terminal domain (NTD) is sufficient.We now know that ERs also regulate expression of target genes that do not have EREs, but instead have various kinds of alternative response elements that ...