WISC-III Verbal/Performance Discrepancies Among a Sample of Gifted Children (original) (raw)
Related papers
Comparison of WISC-R and WISC-IV Intelligence Scores in Gifted Children
2017
Gifted children have been identified as having higher performance in the areas of academic, intellectual ability, creative or productive thinking, arts, esthetic, sports and leadership than their peers (Marland, 1972; Pfeiffer, 2002; Sattler, 2002). Gifted children make rapid progress in these areas; and they need differentiated and specific programs beyond the regular education programs (Sattler, 2002; Smutny & Blocksom, 1990). In this respect, gifted children should be assessed and identified properly for being educated in schools tailored for their abilities. Various assessment tools are used to assess and identify gifted children. The assessment tools generally include standardized tests (intelligence, achievement, social maturity and personality tests), parent and teacher reports, observations on child's behaviors and assessment of child's creativity (Alvino, McDonnel, & Richert, 1981; Sattler, 2002). Especially, individually administered intelligence tests are defined as the most valid and reliable tools. These tests are often used in order to identify intellectual skills of gifted children and place them into necessary education programs (Newman, Sparrow,
Assessing Intellectual Giftedness with the WISC-IV and the IDS
Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 2008
The Hamburg Wechsler Intelligenztest für Kinder (HAWIK-IV; the German version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition) and the newly designed Intelligence and Development Scales (IDS) were administered in counterbalanced order to 77 gifted children and 77 nongifted children, aged 6 to 10 years. Samples were matched for age, sex, and socioeconomic status. Results reveal that both the HAWIK-IV and the IDS are able to distinguish between gifted and nongifted children. Moderate correlations between the tests indicate that the measures assess similar, but not identical constructs. Results are discussed as they pertain to the assessment and special needs of gifted children.
The diagnostic utility of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) in identification of gifted children, 2022
Accurate assessment and early identification of gifted children is of great importance in terms of providing them with educational programs tailored for their abilities in specific areas. Individually administered intelligence tests are widely used to identify gifted children, and an above-average level of intellectual capacity is generally accepted as the main criterion for giftedness. This study aimed to investigate the utility of the Turkish version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) to distinguish gifted children from non-gifted children. For this purpose, 201 gifted children and 201 non-gifted children were included in the study. To be able to determine the predictive power of the WISC-IV index and subtest scores, logistic regression analyses were performed. Results indicated that the Perceptual Reasoning Index, Working Memory Index, and Processing Speed Index scores (except Verbal Comprehension Index score), and all subtest scores significantly predicted giftedness. Furthermore, correct classification rates among gifted children were 93% for index scores and 97% for subtest scores. The findings of this study suggest that intelligence scores obtained from the WISC-IV have a diagnostic utility and provide valid and reliable results in identifying gifted children.
Journal of Intelligence
The manifestation of performance at the top of a given talent distribution constitutes giftedness. While identifying talented youths based on IQ has been the focus of previous research, examining their cognitive profile is a new endeavor. The present study assessed the IQ and cognitive abilities of a sample of gifted Italian children and compared them to their parents using the Wechsler scales. Fifty-nine gifted children aged 6 to 14 years were administered the WISC-IV while their parents (N = 53 mothers and N = 55 fathers) took the WAIS-IV. The gifted children (IQ ≥ 120) obtained particularly high scores in verbal comprehension (VCI) and visual-perceptual reasoning (PRI). More than two-thirds of the mothers and over half of the fathers also achieved an IQ ≥ 120. The gifted children scored significantly higher than both mothers and fathers in VCI and PRI. The mothers were significantly higher than their children in the processing speed domain. Correlational analyses highlighted that...
The commonality of extreme discrepancies in the ability profiles of academically gifted students
Extreme discrepancies in abilities are more common among the most and least able students than among average ability children. Therefore, procedures for identifying gifted children that deliberately or inadvertently rely on a composite score that averages across ability domains will exclude many children who reason exceptionally well in particular symbol systems. In this article, we first discuss general issues in the measurement of ability profiles. We then introduce a method for categorizing score profiles and finally document the reliability and stability of score profiles using the 2000 standardization data of the Cognitive Abilities Test .
Use of a brief form of the stanford-binet intelligence scale (fourth) for gifted children
Journal of School Psychology, 1990
Area scores from a short-form version of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence 'I&t (Fourth) were compared with scores calculated from the long-form version for 33 gifted children. Three of the live mean difference contrasts are significantly different: Means from the Abstract/Visual Reasoning subtests, the Short-Term Memory subtests and the Test Composite obtained from the short form were significantly lower than their corresponding means from the long form. Correlation coefficients between carspondin area scores and the Test Composite were strong and statistically significant. Coeflicients from the two forms ranged from .58 to .93. In general, practitioners using the short form recommended by the test authors should expect to obtain scores very similar to those obtained from administration of the complete battery. If differences occur, the differences will likely reflect slightly higher scores from the complete battery.
Normative achievement assessment of gifted children: Comparing the K-ABC, WRAT, and CAT
Psychology in the Schools, 1986
The Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) purports to assess fluid and crystallized intelligence via processing and achievement subtests, respectively. Eight K-ABC Mental Processing and five K-ABC Achievement subtests were administered to 41 gifted students. Scores were subsequently compared to concurrent achievement measures from the California Achievement Test (CAT), as well as previously obtained mental ability measures (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised [WISC-R], Stanford-Binet [SB], and Wide Range Achievement Test [WRAT] achievement scores). In general, K-ABC mental ability scores were lower than WISC-R and SB IQs. K-ABC achievement scores were consistent with K-ABC mental ability scores, but more highly related to SB and WISC-R VIQ ( r = .42 and .40, respectively) than to WISC-R FSIQ (r = .16) and PIQ (r = .09), or to the K-ABC Mental Processing (Composite r = .17), Simultaneous Processing (r = .08), and Sequential Processing scores (r = .20). With the exception of WRAT Word Recognition, WRAT, K-ABC, and CAT achievement scores were similar. The patterns of intercorrelations suggest that the K-ABC achievement scores are more verbally loaded than are the CAT and WRAT achievement measures.
Factor Structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition among Gifted Students
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2002
The Native American population is severely underrepresented in empirical test validity research despite being overrepresented in special education programs and at increased risk for psychoeducational evaluation. The structural validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) was investigated with a sample of 176, six-to-sixteen-year-old Native American children referred for a psychoeducational evaluation. Confirmatory factor analysis procedures replicated the normative first-order factor structure and a higher-order general ability factor that accounted for the greatest amount of common (69%) and total (33%) variance. These results support the structural validity of the WISC-IV with a referred Native American sample and suggest that interpretation of the WISC-IV scores should not neglect the strong general ability factor. C