VT ThickSat: A Scalable Chassis in the ThinSat Program (original) (raw)
Related papers
VT ThickSat: A Passive Deployer Mechanism for a Carbon Fiber Tape Spring in the ThinSat Program
2020
This paper presents the design, production, and testing of a mechanism to passively deploy a coiled tape spring in a controlled and reliable manner. The design has the tape spring wrapped around a central spool and constrained by five rollers attached to ball bearings on either side. Except for ball bearings and a metal shaft through the central spool to provide an attachment point for an encoder, the mechanism is intended to be mostly 3D printed using various ABS-based polymers. Prototyping the deployer produced data regarding the selected tape spring and the design presented in this paper. Examination under extreme temperatures revealed difficulties for the mechanism to perform appropriately. However, after several design iterations, the final design performed adequately. Finally, the development and testing of this mechanism demonstrated a passive deployable boom capability for a variety of space missions, including spacecraft with passively unfolding structures. Furthermore, the...
Development, manufacturing and testing of small launcher structures from Portugal
Cornell University - arXiv, 2022
During the last decades the Aerospace Industry has seen the number of Earth orbiting satellites rise at a stunning rate. This race stems from the need to monitor Earth and better understand its environments at different scales as well as to establish global communication networks, for example. Nano, micro, and small satellites have been a prime tool for answering these needs, with large and mega constellations planned for the near future, leading to a potential launch gap that can only be answered by an increase on the number of yearly launches, to keep up with demand as well as replenish established capacity. An effective and commercially appealing solution is the development of small launchers. These can complement the current available launch opportunity offer, serving a large pool of different types of clients, with a flexible and custom service that large conventional launchers cannot adequately assure. Rocket Factory Augsburg, who has been developing its own small launcher for the last two years, has partnered with CEiiA, a Portuguese engineering and product development centre, for the development of several structures for the RFA One rocket. The objective has been the design of solutions that are low-cost, light, and custom-made, applying design and manufacturing concepts as well as technologies from other industries, like the aeronautical and automotive, to the aerospace one. This allows for the implementation of a New Space approach to the launcher segment, while also building a supply chain and a set of solutions that enables the industrialisation of such structures for this and future small launchers. The two main systems under development have been a versatile Kick-Stage, for payload carrying and orbit insertion, and a sturdy Payload Fairing, both with multiple configurations. Even though the use of components off-the-shelf have been widely accepted in the space industry for satellites, these two systems pose different challenges as they must be: highly reliable during the most extreme conditions imposed by the launch, so that they can be considered safe to launch all types of payloads; while allowing for the maximum payload mass and volume, making its business case sustainable. Additionally, the manufacturing methods had to be such to allow the easy scale up and ultimately the creation of a production line for these structures. This paper thus dives deep on the solutions developed in the last few years, presenting also lessons learned during the manufacturing and testing of these structures.
OpenOrbiter Mechanical Design: a New Approach to the Design of a 1-U CubeSat
53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2015
The OpenOrbiter Small Spacecraft Development Initiative is working to create a set of designs and implementation instructions for a 1-U CubeSat, called the Open Prototype for Educational NanoSats. These designs target a total parts cost of below USD $5,000. This design will be made publically available to facilitate its use by others, with or without modification. A 'side slotted' CubeSat design (where main circuit boards are placed in slots between the rails on the outside) has been developed for OpenOrbiter. This paper discusses the design choices that were made during the mechanical structure development of the OpenOrbiter CubeSat design, required to keep it within the mass, volume and monetary budgets. Choices like the design of the aluminum support structure, fastener mechanisms, circuit board layout and science package support structure are all discussed and their ease of construction and efficacy are considered. A discussion of ongoing work on the spacecraft's mechanical fabrication and other subsystems is also presented. The paper also discusses how the design can, prospectively, be utilized by others and the 'bigger picture' benefits provided by the design approach and open hardware concept.
CubeSat System Structural Design
This work presents a cubeSat metallic structure design, which considered vitroceramics coatings. Nowadays, existing commercial options of cubeSat are availables, nevertheless they do not solve all the requirements for a specific mission. Therefore, it is proposed to follow a design protocol to satisfy the structural requirements. This protocol has four stages: 1) planning and clarification, 2) conceptual design, 3) preliminary design and 4) detail design. Thereby, it is described the structural dynamics as a consequence of the induced loads by the launch vehicle. Also, it includes a verification process that assess numerical simulations performed using ANSYS, such as convergence analysis. The results are presented in two parts: 1) the metallic structure geometry and 2) behavior evaluation on special-mechanics loads conditions, which must to bear. This evaluation is supported by statics, modal & harmonic response, random vibration and response spectra analysis. Finally, according the proposed protocol, a metallic structure was obtained, which complies with the requirements and specifications defined by the first stage of the design protocol allowing the integration with other CubeSat subsystems.
NASA SBIR 2016 Phase I Solicitation H5 Lightweight Structures and Materials Subtopics
The SBIR topic area of Lightweight Structures and Materials centers on developing lightweight structures and advanced materials technologies for space exploration vehicles including launch vehicles, crewed vehicles and habitat systems, and in-space transfer vehicles. Lightweight structures and advance materials have been identified as a critical need since the reduction of structural mass translates directly to additional up and down mass capability that would facilitate additional logistics capacity and increased science return for all missions. The technology drivers for exploration missions are: Lower mass. Improve efficient packaging of launch volume. Improve performance to reduce risk and extend life. Improve manufacturing and processing to reduce costs. Because this topic covers a broad area of interests, subtopics are chosen to enhance and or fill gaps in the exploration technology development programs. These subtopics can include but are not limited to: Manufacturing processes for materials. Material improvements for metals, composites, ceramics, and fabrics. Innovative lightweight structures. Deployable structures. Extreme environment materials and structures. Multifunctional/multipurpose materials and structures. This year the lightweight spacecraft materials and structures topic is seeking innovative technology for large deployable structures for smallsats, multifunctional materials and structures for integrated structural health monitoring, extreme temperature structures and in-space structural assembly. The specific needs and metrics of each of the focus areas of technology chosen for development are described in the subtopic descriptions. Research awarded under this topic should be conducted to demonstrate technical feasibility during Phase I and show a path toward a Phase II hardware demonstration, and when possible, deliver a full-scale demonstration unit for functional and environmental testing at the completion of the Phase II contract.
Design and Construction of a Space-frame Chassis
The purpose of this project is to design and build a space-frame chassis for a race car to compete in the FSAE-A competition as part of the UWA REV team. The FSAE competition is a competition for university students to design, build and race their own open wheeled race cars, there are also a number of static design events in the competition. The 2011 REV FSAE car will be powered by four electric motors with one mounted to each wheel's upright. This is a new configuration for a FSAE car and as such requires an entirely new chassis design that both supports the loads placed on it but also weighs as little as possible. The chassis design implements structural battery boxes which have the dual purpose of protecting the driver from the batteries and adding strength to the frame, this has not previously been used in any other FSAE car. Using these stressed battery boxes gives the chassis excellent torsional stiffness, yet the entire frame still weighs just over 40kg.
2008
The Low Cost Rapid Response Spacecraft (LCRRS) is an ongoing research development project at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC), Moffett Field, California. The prototype spacecraft, called Cost Optimized Test for Spacecraft Avionics and Technologies (COTSAT) is the first of what could potentially be a series of rapidly produced low-cost satellites. COTSAT has a target launch date of March 2009 on a SpaceX Falcon 9 launch vehicle. The LCRRS research system design incorporates use of COTS (Commercial Off The Shelf), MOTS (Modified Off The Shelf), and GOTS (Government Off The Shelf) hardware for a remote sensing satellite. The design concept was baselined to support a 0.5 meter Ritchey-Chretien telescope payload. This telescope and camera system is expected to achieve 1.5 meter/pixel resolution. The COTSAT team is investigating the possibility of building a fully functional spacecraft for 500,000partsand500,000 parts and 500,000partsand2,000,000 labor. Cost is dramatically reduced by using a sealed container, housing the bus and payload subsystems. Some electrical and RF designs were improved/upgraded from GeneSat-1 heritage systems. The project began in January 2007 and has yielded two functional test platforms. It is expected that a flight-qualified unit will be finished in December 2008. Flight quality controls are in place on the parts and materials used in this development with the aim of using them to finish a proto-flight satellite. For LEO missions the team is targeting a mission class requiring a minimum of six months lifetime or more. The system architecture incorporates several design features required by high reliability missions. This allows for a true skunk works environment to rapidly progress toward a flight design. Engineering and fabrication is primarily done in-house at NASA Ames with flight certifications on materials. The team currently employs seven Full Time Equivalent employees. The success of COTSATs small team in this effort can be attributed to highly cross trained engineering team. The engineers on the team are capable of functioning in two to three engineering disciplines which allows highly efficient interdisciplinary engineering collaboration. NASA Ames is actively proposing mission concepts to use the COTSAT platform to accomplish science. If the COTSAT team validates this approach, it will allow the possibility for remote sensing missions to produce a high science yield for minimal cost and reduced schedule. Another aim of this approach is to yield an accelerated pathway from a Phase A study to mission launch. Leaders in the aerospace industry have shown interest in this methodology. Several visits and tours have been given in the lab. Although the concept of low-cost development is initially met with skepticism from some within the prohibitive aerospace industry, the project's efforts have been highly praised for the accomplishments met within a limited time and budget. Overall the development has progressed tremendously well and the team is answering critical questions for current and future low-cost small satellite developments. COTSAT subsystems are not limited to a specific weight class and could be adapted to produce smaller platforms and to fit various launch vehicles.