Comparison of Water Quality Parameters from South Florida Wastewater Treatment Plants Versus Potential Receiving Waters (original) (raw)
Related papers
Results of Preliminary Class I Injection Well Modeling in Southeast Florida
2008
Regulatory,political,and economic constraints have shaped wastewater management strategies in Southeast Florida. Until the 1960s, South Florida was somewhat undeveloped and wastewater was often emptied into canals and other water bodies. The degradation caused by this practice became obvious in the late 1960s, and with passage of the Clean Water Act, other options were pursued. Currently three wastewater disposal options are available: Class I injection wells, ocean outfalls, and reclaimed water. Ocean outfalls were constructed in the early 1970s, with deep well construction starting after 1977. In contrast to most of the rest of the state, both options are available as a result of the nearby deep waters of the ocean and a deep zone for injection. Both options require secondary treatment.
Comparative Assessment of Municipal Wastewater Disposal Methods in Southeast Florida
Water Environment Research, 2005
A comparative assessment of the risks of three effluent disposal alternatives currently available to wastewater utilities in Southeast Florida is presented in this paper. The alternatives are: deep well injection and ocean outfalls following secondary treatment, and surface water (canal) discharges following secondary wastewater treatment, filtration and nutrient removal. Water quality data, relative to disposal of wastewater treatment plant effluent were gathered, along with water quality data on the receiving waters, from utilities. Comparisons and conclusions regarding potential health concerns associated with the three disposal alternatives. The results indicated that health risks associated with deep wells were generally lower than those of the other two alternatives. The proximity of injection wells to aquifer storage and recovery wells was a determining factor relative to injection well risk. Urban ecological risks were also indicated to be lower, though impacts of urban water use/reuse to the Everglades were not studied. Additional data collection and analysis were recommended to understand the effects of wastewater management on the cycling of water, nutrients and other constituents on southeast Florida. In particular, it was recommended that monitoring of effluents for nitrosamines and pharmaceutically active substances be implemented on a broad scale. Water Environ. Res., 77, 000 (2005).
Goal 2020: Eliminating Surface Water Discharge in Northwest Hillsborough County
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2013
During periods when reclaimed water flow exceeds irrigation demand, the Hillsborough County Northwest Regional Water Reclamation Facility (NWRWRF) discharges water to a surface water outfall that ultimately flows to Old Tampa Bay. Surface water discharge currently requires high levels of treatment for nutrient removal, 5 mg/L cBOD 5 , 5 mg/L total suspended solids (TSS), 3 mg/L total nitrogen (TN), 1 mg/L total phosphorus (TP). The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has approved allocations, which limit the TN and TP loads to surface water and reuse systems. Allocations are set for Old Tampa Bay (TN = 486 tons/year, TP = 104 tons/year) and for the other drainage basins of the bay segments including Hillsborough Bay, Middle Tampa Bay, and Lower Tampa Bay (TBNMC, 2010). Four major facilities in the Hillsborough County Northwest Service Area (NWSA) contribute to Old Tampa Bay. These include the River Oaks and Dale Mabry Advanced Wastewater Treatment Facilities (AWWTFs), and the Van Dyke Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) in addition to the NWRWRF. Water quality requirements in the future for continuing the surface discharge are uncertain and even greater levels of treatment may be required. Eliminating the surface discharge at the NWRWRF, and from the Northwest Service Area overall presents an opportunity to reduce treatment requirements, thereby decreasing operating and maintenance costs and potentially increasing treatment capacity within existing process basins, while enhancing resource conservation and still protecting the aquatic environment. Therefore, Hillsborough County is investigating the feasibility of eliminating the surface water discharges in the NWSA.
Generalized Nondimensional Depth‐Discharge Rating Curves Tested on Florida Streamflow1
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2007
Ash used to say "If you think you can, you can. If you think you can't, you're right". Today I know "I can" and I owe this fruit of my labor: To God for his strength and support, to Eduardo and my babies, Adriana and Alfonso, for their unconditional love and to my wonderful advisor, Dr. Mark Ross, for his help and encouragement. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author graciously acknowledges the invaluable assistance provided by Bill
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2008
The City of Sunrise's Southwest Wastewater Treatment Facility (SWWWTF) was investigating the option for upgrading the plant to meet advanced wastewater treatment (AWT) levels advanced technologies in order to treat wastewater to the level required for groundwater recharge through the use of rapid infiltration basins or trenches. The objective of this pilot study was to determine if these AWT technologies could be used to convert the City's SWWWTF to treat the raw wastewater to a level required for groundwater recharge in Broward County. Chapter 27 Water Quality Standards of the Code of Broward County, Florida, requires for any discharge to the groundwater must meet Total Phosphates (PO4-P) concentration of less than 10 µg/L (parts per billion). This pilot study specifically evaluated the multiple treatment trains combining BNR-MBR technology, reverse osmosis (RO), and chemical phosphorus removal at pilot scale and performed cost analysis for commercial "scale-up" application of treatment alternatives to full-scale wastewater reuse application. Pilot results indicated that the control stream removed orthophosphate to the levels of 10 µg/L 15% of the time and 100 µg/L 75% of the time. Stream A removed orthophosphate to less then 8 µg/L 100% of the time. Stream B effluent showed orthophosphate levels of 10 µg/L 35% and 100 µg/L 96% of the time on single sample basis and levels of 15 µg/L on an average basis. This data was then incorporated to develop an economic evaluation of a full-scale treatment process, along with the regulatory requirements associated with the proposed treatment processes.
US GEOL. SURVEY, EARTH …, 1996
Analysis of tests of subsurface injection, storage, and recovery of freshwater in the Lower Floridan aquifer, Okeechobee County, Florida. V Quinones-Aponte, K Kotun, JF Whitley US GEOL. SURVEY, EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATION ...
Generalized Nondimensional Depth-Discharge Rating Curves Tested on Florida Streamflow
Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2007
Ash used to say "If you think you can, you can. If you think you can't, you're right". Today I know "I can" and I owe this fruit of my labor: To God for his strength and support, to Eduardo and my babies, Adriana and Alfonso, for their unconditional love and to my wonderful advisor, Dr. Mark Ross, for his help and encouragement. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author graciously acknowledges the invaluable assistance provided by Bill