The Impact of Forensic vs. Social-Science Evidence on Judicial Decisions to Grant a Writ of Habeas Corpus (original) (raw)
Related papers
One Hundred Years Later: Wrongful Convictions after a Century of Research, 100
In this Article, the authors analyze a century of research on the causes and consequences of wrongful convictions in the American criminal justice system while explaining the many lessons of this body of work. This Article chronicles the range of research that has been conducted on wrongful convictions; examines the common sources of error in the criminal justice system and their effects; suggests where additional research and attention are needed; and discusses methodological strategies for improving the quality of research on wrongful convictions. The authors argue that traditional sources of error (eyewitness misidentification, false confessions, perjured testimony, forensic error, tunnel vision, prosecutorial misconduct, ineffective assistance of counsel, etc.) are contributing sources, not exclusive causes, of wrongful convictions. They also argue that the research on wrongful convictions has uncovered a great deal about how these sources operate and what might prevent their effects. Finally, the authors urge criminal justice professionals and policymakers to take this research more seriously and apply the lessons learned from a century of research into wrongful convictions.
The genetics of innocence: analysis of 194 U.S. DNA exonerations
Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2011
This new analysis of 194 DNA exonerations, representing 171 criminal events, examines the types of evidence and DNA testing that have been used to free the victims of wrongful conviction. The types of DNA testing used to free the innocent parallels the growth of these techniques in forensic science. Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis now prevails (70%), though Y-STR analysis (16%) and mitochondrial testing (10%) are still used when STR analysis is not feasible, and the recently developed mini-STRs have been used for exonerations since 2008 (2.6%). The types of exculpatory evidence included intimate swabs (65%), clothing (53%), hair (13%), fingernail evidence (5%), cigarettes (3%), and other evidence. The most common factor associated with wrongful convictions was misidentification (75%), including misidentification by the victim (65%). False confessions (including admissions and pleas) were obtained in 30% of the cases, and informant testimony (including jailhouse and government inf...
Confessions that corrupt: Evidence from the DNA exoneration case files
2012
Basic psychology research suggests the possibility that confessions-a potent form of incrimination-may taint other evidence, thereby creating an appearance of corroboration. To determine if this laboratory-based phenomenon is supported in the high-stakes world of actual cases, we conducted an archival analysis of DNA exoneration cases from the Innocence Project case files. Results were consistent with the corruption hypothesis: Multiple evidence errors were significantly more likely to exist in false-confession cases than in eyewitness cases; in order of frequency, false confessions were accompanied by invalid or improper forensic science, eyewitness identifications, and snitches and informants; and in cases containing multiple errors, confessions were most likely to have been obtained first. We believe that these findings underestimate the problem and have important implications for the law concerning pretrial corroboration requirements and the principle of "harmless error" on appeal.
Analyzing Wrongful Convictions beyond the traditional canonical list of errors
Touro Law Review, Vol. 37, 2021
Researchers identify possible structural causes for wrongful convictions: racism, justice system culture, adversary system, plea bargaining, media, juvenile and mentally impaired accused, and wars on drugs and crime. They indicate that unless the root causes of convic-tion error are identified, the routine explanations of error (e.g., eye-witness identifications; false confessions) will continue to re-occur. Identifying structural problems may help to prevent future wrongful convictions. The research involves the coding of archival data from the Innocence Project for seventeen cases, including the one for the Central Park Five exonerees. The data were coded by Hartwick Col-lege and Northern Vermont University students in their respective wrongful convictions courses. Students also designed a vignette of their case and conducted structured interviews with public officers, judges, lawyers, and investigators which inquired into the subjects’ awareness of exonerations. A follow-up study, which is the subject of a future publication, was conducted with students at Curry Col-lege in Boston in 2019, many of whom worked as Boston City Police Officers and in other law enforcement occupations. The officers added their expertise and their appreciation of structural problems like justice system culture. This study emphasizes that the errors we see within the criminal justice system mirror and amplify the prob-lems we see outside of that system. The findings here show that ca-nonical list of errors in these cases may be just a veneer for deeper structural problems.
Polygraphs and 250 Wrongful Conviction Exonerations
Since the 1989 exoneration of Gary Dotson of his rape conviction in Illinois through DNA testing, over twelve hundred fifty (1,250) people have been exonerated from their wrongful convictions. The best source for information about those cases since 1989 is the newly created (May, 2012) National Registry of Exonerations, a joint project of the University of Michigan and Northwestern University Law Schools. These exonerations have correctly shaken our faith in the ability of the criminal justice system to determine truth. In every one of those cases, the truth, as determined "beyond a reasonable doubt" by a judge or jury, was false.
Why a Conviction Should Not Be Based on a Single Piece of Evidence: A Proposal for Reform
This article illustrates a serious flaw in the conventional legal approach enabling a conviction based solely on one piece of evidence. This flaw derives from a cognitive illusion referred to as “the fallacy of the transposed conditional.” People might assume a low error rate in evidence only leads to a small percentage of wrongful convictions. We show that, counterintuitively, even a very low error rate might lead to a wrongful conviction in most cases where the conviction is based on a single piece of evidence. Case law has indicated some awareness of this fallacy, primarily when considering the random match probability for DNA evidence. However, there is almost no awareness of the significance of this fallacy in assessing other types of evidence not considered probabilistic or of the significance of laboratory errors in DNA testing. We show that mistakes do happen with all key types of evidence: fingerprints, DNA, confessions, and eyewitness testimony. We then demonstrate the tre...
Illinois Law Enforcement Executive Training and Standards Board Executive Institute, 2015
This article explores the causal factors amalgamating adjudicative and investigative factors of wrongful conviction. It chronicles the interaction between the causal factors of confirmation bias, misleading specialized knowledge, and tunnel vision that are pathways to perfidy in the criminal justice system and are present in all wrongful convictions. This article considers social science frameworks on a broader scale for understanding wrongful convictions and also for understanding what the root causes are and the interactions between the causal factors that cause wrongful convictions. The article concludes with a discussion to stimulate progress on constitutional reform that advances policy on wrongful convictions.