The Impact of Forensic vs. Social-Science Evidence on Judicial Decisions to Grant a Writ of Habeas Corpus (original) (raw)

This paper examines how different types of evidence, specifically forensic versus social-science evidence, affect judicial decisions related to granting writs of habeas corpus. By analyzing wrongful convictions and their contributory factors, it highlights the significant role that unreliable evidence, such as eyewitness testimony and flawed forensic science, plays in the legal process. The findings suggest that decision-makers must critically assess the validity of evidence to prevent wrongful convictions and improve the justice system.