Structural and competitive determinants of a global integration strategy (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Determinants of Global Integration Strategies of Chinese Multinationals--Some Empirical Evidence
Review of Market Integration, 2010
The main purpose of this research is to understand the determinants of global integration strategies of Chinese Multinational Enterprises (MNEs). In this article, we identify four expansion strategies for Chinese MNEs, that is, horizontal, vertical, lateral and risk diversification and we investigate a series of location and firm-level factors that determine the adoption of each strategy. We present empirical evidence based on data from the 2008 Spring edition of the Lexis Nexis Corporate Affiliates Directory. Our results indicate that Chinese MNEs expand internationally through a grid of strategic choices which is diversified geographically and industrially.
Journal of International Entrepreneurship
The global environmental uncertainty and the need for an organization to maximize profit and satisfy the interest of wider nonmarket groups/stakeholders in the host market propel and reinforce the need for strategic integration to achieve sustainable internationalization performance. The interest of this article is to examine the relative impact of market, nonmarket strategy, and strategy integration on the performance of medium and large organizations in Portugal. Furthermore, environmental uncertainty and firm capabilities were used as moderation to evaluate the performance implication of these strategy configurations on firm market advantage in the host country. Given the need to examine the relationship between the latent and measured variables in this study, structural equation models were used to test the stated hypotheses, while confirmatory factor analyses were used to assess the fitness of our model. Our findings revealed that strategy integration provides a more sustainabl...
A Framework for Analysis of Strategy Development in Globalizing Markets
Journal of International Marketing
This article describes the development of an analytical framework of strategic behavior in globalizing markets, based on different strands of literature (internationalization process, strategic groups, intra-industry trade, and global management). The framework consists of a three-by-three matrix with the following dimensions: the global structure of the industry (industry globality) and the firm's preparedness for internationalization. In each ofthe nine resulting cells ("The Nine Strategic Windows") the author discusses consequences for strategic behavior of the firm. The author makes concrete suggestions on company strategy, varying from "stay at home" to "strengthen your global position." In order to illustrate the framework, the study of a Norwegian ship equipment manufacturer is briefiy discussed.
Managing Globalization—International Business Strategies
The strategy making process begins as industry and company analyses are brought into the corporate planning process. In this most important part of the management processes, corporate missions, assets, and competencies are reviewed, and businesses and market strengths and weaknesses are assessed. From these evaluations, companies prepare to internationalize their operations or, if they are seasoned campaigners, to integrate their activities globally. These processes ensure that firms have the appropriate organizations and managerial talent to cope with the rigors of extending businesses over increasing numbers of markets, and to ensure that personnel, corporate processes, and organizational structures are matched to industry, business, and market needs. Once internal analyses are complete, firms review and evaluate their choices of market entry and servicing strategies.
Global strategy: a review and an integrated conceptual framework
In an era of globalization, managers, consultants, and researchers have all recognized that the study of industries, strategies, and organizations in a global context needs to be regarded as the norm. It has been argued that success or failure of a business in the twenty-first century will depend on whether it can compete effectively in world markets (for example, Hax, 1989;. Global strategy, hereby defined as the way a business competes in the global market, plays a vital role in determining the performance of a business in the global market. By conceiving a global strategy, management articulates a response to the interdependent nature of global markets, where competition is no longer on a market-by-market basis (multidomestic). Global strategy must not only incorporate broad, strategic direction but also specify how activities such as sourcing, R&D, manufacturing, and marketing must be co-ordinated worldwide. Because marketing assumes the role of interacting directly with the customers and competitors in the marketplace, marketing strategy is probably the most important component of a firm's global strategy.
Organization Science, 2000
With the increasing globalization of business, there has been growing interest in how to create and manage a successful international enterprise. Although researchers and practitioners have grappled with the issue of globalization for some time, there is no one model that encompasses the range of phenomena we observe in the global economy, nor have those models that do exist been precisely formalized. This paper provides an expanded approach to thinking about the organizational forms and linkages that exist in international business operations. Building on the popular integration-responsiveness framework of international strategic orientation, we develop a more expansive approach that is better able to account for the diversity of organizational forms and strategic choices open to managers. By adding a third set of environmental pressures, incorporating the beliefs of managers, and by employing the idea of efficient frontiers, we reformulate the integration-responsiveness framework, making it more consistent with modern economic models of the firm. Our integration-responsiveness-completeness (IRC) model argues that global firms can respond to these fundamental and competing pressures by configuring themselves in a variety of ways—rather than normatively prescribing that the transnational form is optimal. In addition, our model has methodological ramifications. Its formal structure suggests that empirical techniques that focus on the best rather than average performance are necessary to adequately investigate the performance differences among alternative organizational forms. This may explain the paradoxical lack of empirical support for a link between organizational form and performance.
Implications of Globalization for International Business Strategy: A Multi-Sectoral Approach
2014
Much of the debate on the alleged evils and merits of globalization has been based on after the fact argument. This paper takes an approach that globalization has implications for international business strategy and delve into these implications. The paper utilized library survey, which analyzed the available literature on the implications of globalization on international business strategy. The appropriateness of this method to the study was the ability to review a wide variety of secondary literature that is relevant to the research area. In this regard, four empirical cases were selected using Purposive sampling technique which enabled the researchers to select cases that had the desired information or the required characteristics that were useful in achieving the objective of the study. Content analysis method was used in view of the qualitative nature of much of the data collected. Findings indicate that globalization and especially the entry of Chinese firms significantly chan...