Six reasons why Central Asia had to be the PIE original homeland (original) (raw)
Related papers
Ten reasons why Central Asia had to be the PIE original homeland
In this short paper, I will sum up the ten main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 01-24, first published in Scientific culture in 2022, available on Academia and ResearchGate.
Ten reasons why Central Asia had to be the PIE original homeland 04-
In this short paper, I will sum up the ten main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 03-24, first published in Scientific culture in 2022, available on Academia and ResearchGate.
Ten reasons why Central Asia had to be the PIE original homeland 04-24
In this short paper, I will sum up the ten main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 03-24, first published in Scientific culture in 2022, available on Academia and ResearchGate.
Ten reasons why Central Asia had to be the PIE original homeland 03 24
In this short paper, I will sum up the ten main reasons why Central Asia was the PIE original homeland, on the basis of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANS-EURASIAN ORIGINAL LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH 03-24, first published in Scientific culture in 2022, available on Academia and ResearchGate.
The Steppe Homeland of PIE' Hypothesis: A Critique
This paper is intended as a short preliminary draft. Hence, I have not given detailed explanations of the issues discussed in it or the source of references. It is only intended to highlight some deficiencies in the available evidence for the currently popular models of the origin of Indo-European languages, its breakup, and expansion before 4000 BCE.
Ten Constraints that Limit the Late PIE Homeland to the Steppes
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference. Hamburg: Buske. 1–25., 2024
Since 2015, migrations from the Pontic-Caspian steppes into Europe and Asia have been revealed by the study of ancient DNA, leading to the recent resurgence of the steppe theory of Proto-Indo-European (PIE) origins. But the linguistic and archaeological support for the steppe theory has not been updated or integrated with recent specialist studies that examined aDNA not only from humans but also from horses, dairy peptides preserved in dental calculus, human skeletal pathologies associated with horseback riding, or other archaeological evidence. Here I differentiate Early PIE, prior to the Anatolian split, from Late PIE, also called Core or Nuclear PIE, the ancestor of all other IE branches. Ten linguistic, chronological, cultural, and genetic constraints taken from the LPIE vocabulary, its radiocarbon-dated material attestations such as wheels, and migrations revealed by aDNA are reviewed, supporting the hypothesis that the LPIE dialects were spoken in the Pontic-Caspian steppes 3500-2500 BCE.
Central Asia: the common Eurasian homeland of Gaulish and Balkan languages
In this short paper, I will sum up the findings of my study DID INDO-EUROPEAN LANGUAGES STEM FROM A TRANSEURASIAN LANGUAGE? AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, published in Scientific Culture in January 2022 and on my profiles on Academia and ResearchGate. 1/ Linguistic studies According to Kassian (2021), Eurasian languages stem from an original Eurasian language, which included Samoyedic languages and split between 18,000 and 8,000 BC. This is consistent with Pagel-Atkinson (2013), postulating that the seven language families of Eurasia form a linguistic superfamily which evolved from a common ancestor around 15,000 years ago, with a homeland in Central Asia, from which Dravidian, Kartvelian and Basque were the first to separate, followed by PIE around 8,700 years ago, which contradicts the theory of Kurgans, postulating a much later formation of PIE.
In this paper, we bring together the concepts put forth in our previous papers and throw new light on how the Indo-Europeanization of the world may have happened from the conventional Central Asian homeland and explain the same using maps and diagrams. We also propose the ‘Ten modes of linguistic transformations associated with Human migrations.’ With this, the significance of the proposed term ‘Base Indo-European’ in lieu of the old term ‘Proto Indo-European’ will become abundantly clear to most readers. The approaches presented in this paper are somewhat superior to existing approaches, and as such are expected to replace them in the longer run. Detailed maps and notes demonstrating and explaining how linguistic transformations might have taken place in South Asia are available in this paper as understood from our previous research papers, and scholars from other parts of the world are invited to develop similar paradigms with regard to their home countries as far as the available data or evidence will allow them. This will help piece together a gigantic jig-saw puzzle, and lead to a revolution of sorts in the field, leading to a ripple-effect that will strongly impact several other related fields of study as well. We also re-emphasize our epigrammatic catch-phrases ‘The Globalization of Science’ and ‘Scientific Progress at the Speed of Light’, and attempt to show how the former will inexorably lead to the latter. This is done in a respectable level of detail, as zany and theoretical concepts gain respectability only if corroborated with real-world data from across the world. The end-result will be a transformation and a revolution in human knowledge, with inevitable cascading changes in cultural and social paradigms and relationships across nationalities and cultures, and rich rewards for scholars and students of Indo-European studies across the world.