Research ethics and integrity (original) (raw)
Related papers
How to Practice Academic Medicine and Publish from Developing Countries?, 2021
Ethics is a set of moral principles of ‘what is right?’ and ‘what is wrong?’ or, in simple words, ‘what is good and what is bad?’ When the same principles are applied to medicine, the subject is called medical ethics. It is expected that a doctor should act in a particular way and follow certain rules. Medical ethics are professional standards for physicians. Bioethics is a branch of medical ethics and deals with complex issues like euthanasia, transplant medicine, genetic medicine, assisted reproduction therapy, human cloning, and medical genomics. Medical ethics and bioethics concepts are guides for physicians and to ensure patient safety.
Ethics and its Importance in Research
The social sciences and their contribution to scientific research: empirical studies, 2021
Research ethics and research integrity have similar concepts, where both are focused on the researcher's ethical behavior in terms of obtaining the information and reporting the results, highlighting that research integrity refers mainly to the fact that the processes that have been carried out before, during and after obtaining and analyzing the data have been carried out in an ethical manner.
Research Ethics: Meaning And Principles
Research means finding answer or solution of something in a systematic way. It is regarded as the development of a certain topic through a scientific approach and ethics are conscience based rules and regulations that help us to justify between right and wrong behavior. Actually, research ethics are the set of principles which influence a researcher to complete his work without doing anything wrong and against policies of research ethics. It includes appropriate data collection while researching through field work, proper referencing while using other's writing and not using false information. Even, it includes the appropriate behavior with the fellow workers and the other persons who are the subject matter of the research. Actually, research ethics refer to the application of basic ethical principles to the research work which include the graph and implementation of research, honorific value for a society and others, use of resources and research outputs and the regulations of research. The Oxford dictionary defines research ethics as, "A set of ethical and moral rules that guide research practice.". It is the only way to control the behavior of a researcher during doing a research because law can only control a person externally, but ethics control the internal justification of a person. Ethics in research is mandatory because it lets one discover a new dimension of knowledge. If it is done unethically, it won't be fruitful. The following research is based on logical explanation, introduction to the history of research ethics, compatible data collection, inclusion of figures for pellucid upshifts about the topic.
Journal of Education and Ethics in Dentistry, 2013
Background: The fi eld of dentistry has developed rapidly over the past century based on the Hippocratic principles. Research in dentistry is aimed at investigating the causes and treatment of dental disease and is based on the same ethical standards that govern the fi eld of medicine. Very little research has investigated the attitudes of dental professionals toward the concepts of research ethics and the acceptability of research ethics committees, accordingly a cross sectional study was designed in our institution. Aims and Objectives: The objectives of our study were to assess the knowledge awareness and attitudes of dental faculty regarding research ethics committees and research ethics. Materials and methods: A cross sectional survey was carried out in our institution with the consent of the ethical committee. The study was designed in a questionnaire form which was used to assess attitudes, awareness of dental professional regarding research ethics committee and knowledge in practices of research ethics. A total of 115 proformas were distributed and 100 completely fi lled proformas were analysed. Results: The dental faculty is favourable towards research ethics training and role of research ethics committee in conducting quality dental research. About greater than half of the participants (51%) had a prior experience in research involving human subjects. Among people involved in prior research about 49% participants have conducted <OR = 3 projects, while 2-3% of the people were involved in >3 research projects. The attitudes towards practices in research ethics showed that greater than 90% (94-98%) of the patients responded positively. The results from the survey recommends the institutional authorities about the need for training in research ethics with special emphasis on vulnerable participants, aspects related to responsible conduct of research and the roles and functions of research ethics committees. Conclusion: Adequate knowledge of the dental professionals regarding research ethics and their attitudes towards practices of ethical principles and ethical committees will favour quality research and provide a caring society.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2014
Background: Research activities are increasing in all the fields of medicine including dentistry but there is dearth of information about the knowledge, attitude and behaviour of dental professionals for ethical principles in research, especially in the developing countries like India. Objective: To assess knowledge, attitude and behaviour among dental professionals pertaining to research ethics. Methodology: A self-administered, close ended questionnaire survey with cross-sectional design was conducted in a private dental institute in India. All the house-surgeons, postgraduate students and the faculty of the same institute were included for the assessment of the knowledge, attitude and behaviour regarding research ethics using a 24, 8 and 8 items. Results: A total of 213 of 230 dental professionals participated (response rate of 92.6%). Mean knowledge, attitude and behaviour scores were 43.3%, 82.5% and 46.37%, respectively. Significant correlations were observed of age and gender with the attitude about the research ethics among study subjects (χ 2 =14.383, p=0.006 and χ 2 =7.769, p=0.021, respectively). Conclusion: Participants had favorable attitude towards research ethics, but their knowledge and behaviour needs considerable improvements. The age and gender were associated with attitude. The present pilot study highlights the need for further nationwide study and development of research ethics curriculum in detail for dental education in India.
International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences, 2020
Background: Research ethics encompasses the principles, standards, norms and guidelines that regulate scientific inquiry. Attitudes of postgraduate students towards concepts of research ethics should be considered important towards quality research output. Aim of the study was to assess knowledge and attitudes about research ethics among postgraduate students of dental colleges in Davangere city. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted involving 147 postgraduate students of two dental colleges in Davanagere city. A pretested 26 items self-administered questionnaire to assess the knowledge, attitude and awareness about research ethics was distributed to participants. Responses to knowledge related questions had multiple choices and responses to attitude related items were on 3 point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics was generated in frequencies and percentages. Results: Out of 147 students around 48.9% 64.8% students had fair knowledge and more than 80% showe...
Ethics and Bioethics as a research topic in Dentistry: a gap in the scientific knowledge
2018
Bibliometric quantitative investigation in the website files of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), through a search of the term/fragment "ethic". The presence of Ethics and Bioethics as a subject of dental research was negligible during the study period. There is a large gap in the production of scientific knowledge within this area, which may lead to repercussion both in academic as well as in performance of dental professionals.
Perception of research ethics among dental fraternity in Chennai: A cross sectional analysis
Background: Dental research is fundamental to advancing the field, but ethical considerations are paramount. This study explores the perception of research ethics among dental professionals in Chennai, aiming to identify areas for improvement and enhance ethical awareness. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to October 2023, involving 146 dental students and dentists. A questionnaire assessed their understanding of research ethics. Data were collected via Google Forms, ensuring anonymity and privacy. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Version 26. Results: Most participants were involved in research (65.8%), but awareness of ethical principles varied. While many understood about informed consent (59.6%), there was limited knowledge of the Helsinki Declaration (40.4%). Participants recognized the need for special procedures for vulnerable populations (21.9%). The majority expressed interest in Research Ethics workshops (66.4%). Conclusion: Dental professionals' awareness of research ethics varies. Comprehensive ethics education is essential to uphold ethical standards, ensure participant rights, and maintain professional integrity. Participants' interest in ethics education offers an opportunity for improvement.
Journal of Orofacial Research, 2020
Background: To assess the knowledge, attitudes and practice of medical faculty regarding research ethics and research ethics committees (RECs). Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted in ESIC medical colleges in Bangalore among faculty using a validated questionnaire. Questions were designed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practice of medical faculty regarding research ethics and research ethics committees. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results: Majority (76%) of faculty had not undergone training in research ethics. Less than half of the participants answered correctly to a question on guidelines in research ethics, 60% responded correctly to question on research involving children. Majority responded correctly to question on role of a research ethics committee and confidentiality, informed consent and to question on composition of Institutional Ethics Committee. 68% taught that ethical review of research by an ethics committee would delay research. >90% were favourable towards research ethics training. Faculty held attitudes regarding certain research ethics practices that were not optimal, 96% believed that it is okay to fabricate data, 68% taught that if no surrogate is available to give informed consent for vulnerable groups, they could still be included. Conclusions: We conclude that among the medical faculties participating in our study, there is acceptance of RECs and training in research ethics, while there are knowledge gaps in research ethics guidelines, research involving children. There is need to train researchers and students to make them aware about various aspects of research.