Lawfulness and the Perception of Legal Salience (original) (raw)
Related papers
Fundamental legal concepts: A formal and teleological characterisation*
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2007
... when it concerns the prohibition against performing certain inferences (against reasoning in cer ... conditionals represent a fundamental, through often misunder-stood, construct of legal knowledge. ... B must at least provide for defeasible normative detachment: the ante-cedent ...
The fundamental reasons for officials to apply the criteria of validity available within the system’s rule of recognition, according to a basic reading of The Concept of Law, could be of various provenience (moral,conventional, traditional, other). However, to think of these criteria as genuine reasons it must be supposed thatthey are internal reasons that refer to agents’ motivational set. In this paper, the idea of the internal point of viewis juxtaposed with the notion of “internal reason” as introduced by B. Williams. It is argued that if fundamentallegal reasons are to be normative (authoritative) – at least in a conceptual sense – they must be internal reasons,which are moral in character. It is just another way to build an argument that Hart simply presented an “over-weak” theory of the internal point of view.
Guastini - A Realistic View on Law and Legal Cognition
The author outlines one form of analytical legal realism as the junction of three main theses. According to its first main thesis, interpretive sentences in legal discourse are ascriptive sentences with no cognitive function. According to the second thesis, the law is the set of norms in force, i.e. the norms actually applied (that is, used in deciding cases) in the past and predictably applied in the future by law-applying agencies. The third thesis is that legal science as a cognitive activity must not be confused with legal scholarship. Although legal scholars do engage in cognitive activities, their work mainly consists in non-cognitive activities such as interpretation and legal construction. | An earlier version of this statement was published in Revus (2013) 19 in Italian, French, and Croatian.
Summum Ius Summa Iniuria-Comments on the Historical Background of a Legal Maxim of Interpretation
Acta Juridica Hungarica, 2004
Interpretation based on maxims of legal logic occupies an honourable place among the possible methods of legal interpretation; this being done most frequently using basic concepts originating from the classical period of Roman law, which faciliate orientation among contradictory decrees and help to clarify the meaning of legal rules. The following principles belong hereby, widely known in Modestinus's formulation but dating from the period of the leges XII tabularum: "lex posterior derogat legi priori", the Papinian "lex specialis derogat legi generali", and the "lex primaria derogat legi subsidiariae". It is a basic interpretive principle, that the legal rule should be interpreted in its integrity, not by extracting certain parts of it. The following the letter of the law often leads to its evasion. During the interpretation one should take into account the legislator's intention. If this is doubtful, the more lenient solution should be preferred. All these ideas can be traced back into a highly philosophical, Celsian principle, which is-also widely accepted in contemporary legal thinking. It-declares the vocation of the Law to implement Justice, according to which "ius est ars boni et aequi", the Law is an art of the Good and the Just. Out of these, the procedure called in fraudem legis is connected to the statement that enforcing the letter of the law often leads to inequity contradictory with the spirit of the law, i. e. injustice. Cicero also quotes this proverbium, already widely spread in the age of the Republic, which remained in use in his formulation until today: "summum ius summa iniuria", i. e. the utmost enforcement of the law leads to the greatest injustice. The present paper has a modest aim. It does not offer a general survey, but rather an introspection into the problem. First it enumerates the occurences of this proverb in the sources of Roman literature (I.), then it sketches the development and semantic changes of the concept of interpretatio (II.), next it investigates the meaning of summum ius in the relation of the ars boni et aequi principle and the concept of Justice in legal sources and Cicero's works (III.), in the end it will consider the further reaching consequences of this proverbium in Adagia by Erasmus of Rotterdam, one of the most important humanists (IV.).
Practical Wisdom in Legal Decision-Making
University of Edinburgh School of Law Working …, 2010
This paper's objective is to provide an account of certain aspects of a relationship between, on the one hand, moral and intellectual virtues and, on the other hand, the phenomenon of law-application. The paper is not centrally concerned with the relationship between a general conception of ethics (i.e. virtue ethics ) and law, but instead focuses on the relationship of certain traits of character, in particular certain aspects of practical wisdom, and the process of legal decision-making. The paper's central objective is to present a plausible picture of subjectively possessed virtue, and in particular of practical wisdom, that is able to play a role in legal decision-making.