Deregulation: The Effect of Market-led Approach to Nigerian Universities Management (original) (raw)
Related papers
Deregulation Policies in Theory, Privatization in Practice: A Case of Nigerian Universities
International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 2016
This paper is designed to study deregulation policy as it has been applied to the university sector in Nigeria. Previous study suggests that the Nigerian government introduced deregulation to universities, among others policies. The government aims to use the policy to change the situation or address problems Nigerian university are confronting, but it is very difficult to conclude whether the assumption of deregulation is correct. Therefore, this study maps deregulation policy from past literature to give a clear picture of how the policy has been perceived within the system. This study is desk research and is done to verify the existing knowledge of the policy within the sector. The findings reveal that the sector only witnesses deregulation as a general policy not as expected in practice, because the government still jealously guide and take responsibility for the universities they establish, without giving room to private investors to participate in the business.
DEREGULATION POLICY: Impact on Nigerian Universities
This paper was designed to examine the impact of government policies relating to deregulation on universities in Nigeria. It was observed that the Nigerian government is often quick in making policies to govern different sectors of the State’s affairs, especially government-owned establishments or parastatals, from which higher education establishments are not exempted. The Nigerian government sees university education as an instrument to gear the economy to improvement, growth and development. As a result of the need to improve the Nigerian economy, different policies have been introduced, with different interpretations, over the last decade. This is an approach that has also been introduced to university education, with the hope of solving funding and mismanagement issues. This paper uses a standard literature review to study the government deregulation policies from their origin and to discuss the findings. The findings suggest that the deregulation policy was introduced to the university as strategy or approach that was assumed to be able to solve the long debated problem of access and funding in Nigerian universities. However, the policy was introduced in such a way that it solved the problem of access practically, but created other problems, such as management and funding issues.
Deregulation policy: A review of Nigerian universities
This paper is intended to study the effects of the deregulation policy on university education in Nigeria with a view to understanding how the policy has been introduced and applied. The introduction of the deregulation policy to Nigerian universities has been aimed at improving the system. Although the policy has been introduced successfully in other sectors such as telecommunications, it has damaged other institutions such as the university system, because it is difficult to treat the university system like other institutions where deregulation policies have worked perfectly. The difficulty of treating a university like any other institution in terms of it multifaceted units has widened the gap in replicating any borrowed policy whether or not it has worked in any other sector to the university. The extent to which this gap has widened and its effect on service quality in the Nigerian university context have not been studied and these gaps remain unfilled. This research intends to fill this vacuum by exploring past literature using a standard literature review to discuss relevant works in the area of deregulation. The findings reveal that the introduction of a policy of deregulation on university education in Nigeria was not carefully considered and was not fit for purpose. Instead, the policy was suggested to try and solve the financial problems the country was facing at the time. As the policy was not considered properly before it was adopted, some confusion and misconception arose as to how the service was expected to run during the process. Likewise, other beneficiaries (such as funding bodies, accreditation team, employers of graduates, parents and students) of university education’s involvement were not well spelled out in the process of implementing deregulation policy.
DEREGULATION POLICIES IN THEORY, PRIVATISATION IN PRACTICE: A CASE OF NIGERIAN UNIVERSITIES
This paper is designed to study deregulation policy as it has been applied to the university sector in Nigeria. Previous study suggests that the Nigerian government introduced deregulation to universities, among others policies. The government aims to use the policy to change the situation or address problems Nigerian university are confronting, but it is very difficult to conclude whether the assumption of deregulation is correct. Therefore, this study maps deregulation policy from past literature to give a clear picture of how the policy has been perceived within the system. This study is desk research and is done to verify the existing knowledge of the policy within the sector. The findings reveal that the sector only witnesses deregulation as a general policy not as expected in practice, because the government still jealously guide and take responsibility for the universities they establish, without giving room to private investors to participate in the business.
UNIVERSITY EDUCATION DEREGULATION IN NIGERIA: PROS AND CONS
2005
The issues of deregulation are mostly the offshoot of extraneous factors and internal administrative needs of Nigerian University Education System. As public policies, deregulation implies expanded private sector activity with complimentary contraction in public sector size in the interest of productive efficiency. It is evident that deregulation allows corporation to benefit but at the possible expense of people in that nation and region if that deregulation means relaxation of environmental rules, health and educational services including control of resources and energy. However, over the short term, certain problems could emerge. Increasingly sever competition could force schools to adjust with weaker ones failing. Schools where productivity is poor could see painful layoffs and disequilibrium in the employment situation. Stronger employment-promotion measures are needed to overcome these problems. If the adverse effects of deregulation are minimised in an appropriate fashion, the overall positive economic effects will outweigh the negative ones.
Deregulation and Tertiary Education in Nigeria: Implications for National Development
The study investigated the perceived impact of government policy of deregulation on tertiary educational system in Nigeria. Edo state was taken as the case study. A total of 881 respondents provided responses that were used for analysis. Data analysis was accomplished using frequency tables, mean and Friedman test.The respondents felt the enactment of the policy was borne out of government inability to fund tertiary education development (mean = 3.45) and called for stricter issuance of licensing (mean = 3.37). In the opinion of the respondents, deregulation of the tertiary educational system has had important positive and negative impacts on the educational sector. Notable positive impacts included increased students enrolment or admission into tertiary institutions in the country (mean = 4.58), and improved infrastructural development (mean = 4.00). The major negative impacts of the deregulation bordered on increased unemployment among university graduates (mean = 3.99) and compromised admission process/procedures employed by private tertiary institutions (mean = 3.91). Friedman test showed that significant differences exist in the perceived impact of the deregulation of the tertiary education sector.Based on the findings the author recommends among others that; government should exercise closer monitoring of institutions with license to operate private universities; government should also expand the industrial development to encourage employment and,the officers of the quality control agencies should be encouraged to maintain professionalism in the conduct of their exercise.
University Staff’s Perception of Deregulation on Higher Education in Nigeria
The study investigated the university staff's perception on deregulation of higher education in Nigeria. Descriptive research of the survey type was used for the study. The population comprised all the university staff of universities in Ekiti and Ondo states, Nigeria. Simple random sampling technique was used to select 700 academic and non-academic staff from the Federal and State universities in Ekiti and Ondo states. Research instrument designated University Staff Perception of Deregulation on Higher Education (USPDHE) was used in collecting data. The questionnaire was subjected to face and content validity. The reliability co-efficient of the instrument was 0.75. The results showed that deregulation improved academic standard of the universities except in the areas of curriculum innovation and collaborative research and does not guarantee job security nor improve staff development and equity in salary structure but it contributed to managerial effectiveness, efficiency and accountability, It also showed that students were affected in the area of access to higher education, class structure, admission choice and exploitation by the institutions. It equally showed that deregulation is not improving the funding of higher institutions in Nigeria instead it throws the institution into dilemma of sourcing for fund. Some of the recommendations are: using management strategies at the institutional level, autonomy should use management strategies that emphasize improved standards in terms of improved curricula, and academic excellence by all and sundry within the system. Also, to have the full gains of deregulation, climate of academic integrity should be enshrined in the operation of the university system.
QUALITY ISSUE: A Decade After University Privatisation in Nigeria
This paper was design to look into quality issue in Nigerian universities, a decade after the privatisation policy was established. This paper is a desk research with the intensity to observe how Nigeria University institutions have positioned itself after the introduction of privatisation policy. The study focuses attention on contemporary issues around what lead to the establishment of private universities in Nigeria and its effects on service delivery, that have raised concerns about quality or question of whether or not quality is factored into the development of privately owned university in the country. The findings reveals that the introduction of privatisation policy has reduce the public university unrest in terms of strike action, monopoly of market and many more. The existence of the private universities have created more access and have given candidates opportunity to choose among various options. The findings also reveals that at the start of the private universities, many of the university tend to be effective but after a few years they began to drop their standard due to lack of funding support, even overcrowding, late payment of staff salaries among others.
Privatization of Higher Education in Nigeria: Critical Issues
2012
The broad intent of any educational reform is premised on the assumption that it is capable of improving educational process and practices, hence, the need for evaluation of the system’s process in order to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of resource allocation. Education is capital intensive in terms of human, financial and material resources. Its provision and management determine the quality and functionality of the system. This paper sought to assess the extent to which privatization policy has actually addressed quality improvement and also verify if there is justification for private participation in the provision and management of tertiary institutions in Nigeria in an attempt to suggesting some quality improvement strategies. The rationale for deregulation and privatization of the sector was provided and the challenges in the policy were also highlighted. Based on this, it was concluded that though privatization policy enhances access, it is not a panacea to quali...
This study provides relevant economic ideas that can assist Nigeria and other African countries in making innovative policies at privatizing university education. A review of the education market scene on the continent provides an imperfect market with adverse consequences occasioned by inadequate information and unbridled competition. Advocating a joint role for sharing the costs and benefits of university education between government and private sectors, the study suggests a four-policy option for adoption by Nigeria and other African countries. These are, in ascending order of importance: regulated private, subsidized private, competitive private, and complementary private systems of university education Using the Backcock University in Nigeria as an example, this paper demonstrates the positive managerial influence of a competitive and complementary system of private university. Nevertheless, to forestall market failure, this study rounds off by pointing out the reformatory, regulatory and redemptive roles of government in the management of private universities in Nigeria and other African countries.