South Caucasus, Russia and The EU: forging an efficient over-arching cooperative regional security sceme (original) (raw)

The end of 20-th century was marked by an increase in the number of ethnopolitical conflicts throught the world. The redrawing of the political map of the world in the last century, following the results of the world wars, the elimination of colonial system and the collapse of empires, has affected the growth of ethnic confrontations in modern society. In view of the fact that any conflict inside the state is always detrimental to social-economic and political development of the country, and the world is full of polyethnic states, the birth of new interethnic contradictions, can affect the stability and security of the entire world community. In this regard, particular importance in the policy of each state, is the deep study of the characteristics of ethnic clashes, for the subsequent development of mechanisms for their forecasting, regulation and prevention. In this Thesis I will try ty examin the Conflicts in South Caucasus: Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Naghorno-Karabakh

Unresolved Conflicts in the Regional Security System: The Case of the South Caucasus

Transition Studies Review, 2004

The collapse of the USSR was accompanied by transformation of the South Caucasian latent ethnopolitical conflicts into local wars. Today the situation in the area of the conflicts is “neither war, nor peace”. Three unresolved conflicts of the South Caucasus can be considered as one of the most serious obstacles for establishing a regional security system. The article gives the general characteristics of these conflicts, the trends of their development, taking into account the time factor, and analyzes the behavioral models of the main players – de jure recognized and unrecognized de facto states of the South Caucasus. The basic objective of the main players should be to keep the situation on a level preventing the resumption of the armed conflicts. The attempts of forced resolution of the conflicts are fraught with destabilization of the situation not only in the area of any of these conflicts but in the whole region.

South Caucasus at the Crossroads of Geo-Strategical Interests: New Era of Regional Security or New Challenges to Peace-Building?

International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 2022

The paper explores the new situation emerged in South Caucasus region after the 44-days war in Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh). After the collapse of the Soviet Union, three conflicts broke out in South Caucasus, and none of them is not yet settled. This fact makes the region more unstable, deeply volatile and continually disintegrated. The political regimes of intra and extra-regional countries, especially regional autocratic ones, have a negative impact on conflict resolution and peace-building process in South Caucasus. The whole potential of this region can't be revealed and exploited without settling frozen and/or unfrozen conflicts in Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Nagorno-Karabakh. The unsolved conflicts will lead to a permanent regional instability and uncertainty by giving chance to extra-regional actors for the use of their geo-strategical interests. The regional instability is transformed into a stable tool for the extra-regional actors, especially autocratic ones, to interfere and to keep pseudo-mediation by promoting their own interests. The issues of regional communications' unblocking, borders' demarcation and delimitation as well as regional integration possibilities are discussed. The exploration of these issues showcased the need for a common platform or practically experienced concept of regional peace-building that have to be shared by all regional countries.

Managing conflict and integration in the South Caucasus: A challenge for the European Union

Parallel integration projects in the South Caucasus have led to Georgia’s conclusion of an Association Agreement (AA) with the European Union (EU) in June 2014 and Armenia’s accession to the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) in January 2015. The resulting increase in regional fragmentation adds up to existing intra-regional political fault lines, including the protracted conflicts of Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Nagorno-Karabakh. In the process of reviewing its role in the South Caucasus, the EU should increase political and diplomatic engagement to mitigate conflict dynamics, and lessen the destabilizing aspects of EU–Russia competition in the South Caucasus. To this end, this policy brief offers four recommendations to strengthen its conflict-resolution and stability-building policies in the region.

The New Balance of Power in the Southern Caucasus in the Context of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in 2020 (2020 Yılı Dağlık Karabağ Çatışması Bağlamında Güney Kafkasya'da Yeni Güç Dengesi)

R&S - RESEARCH STUDIES ANATOLIA JOURNAL, 2021

Although it has an important historical background, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, which gained its sovereignty after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, has been the most important conflict issue in the South Caucasus from 1992 until today. Despite the multiple resolutions of the UN Security Council and the international community, Armenia which occupied the Azerbaijani territories there did not take a step back from this de facto situation with the influence of the strong diaspora in the USA and the EU, and the work of the Minsk Group established within this framework could not bring a solution to this problem. It is aimed in this paper to analyze the above-mentioned conflict in 2020. In this context, in the first part, the historical background is set forth and all parties and their effects are revealed. Later on, the events of the conflict and the peace agreement are included, and the final situation after the agreement is examined. Lastly, an analysis of the conflict has been made in conclusion, and also the .new situation that emerged in the South Caucasus has been evaluated.

THE REGIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM IN THE CENTRAL CAUCASUS: POLITICAL STRUCTURE AND CONFLICTS (2012)

The Caucasus & Globalization, 2012

The author assesses the impact of the political structure of a regional security system on its proneness to conflict. Political factors (obviously not the only explanation for regional tension) belong to the sum-total of factors that should primarily be discussed for the purposes of assessing conflict development in the region. The studies of the security system of the post-Soviet Central Caucasus presented in the article suggest that the specifics of the regional political structure were conducive to the emergence of armed conflicts and their preservation.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.