Contesting the Mainstream Narrative? A Conceptual Discussion on the Politics of Science, Technology, and Innovation from the Periphery (original) (raw)
Related papers
Beyond the ‘‘Charmed Circle’’ of OECD: New Directions for Studies of National Innovation Systems
In this paper, we engage with the widespread and influential approach of National Innovation Systems (NIS). We discuss its adequacy to non-OECD countries, especially in Latin America where it tends to be reified. Although the NIS approach is meant to address the most pressing needs of the economies it applies to, we argue that it would benefit from developing a more encompassing scope, allowing integration of greater diversity and complexity. By retracing the history of regimes of science, technology and innovation in Latin America, we explore the following paradox: whereas numerous Southern scholars urge the pressing need to develop an innovation agenda for Southern countries with a ‘‘Southern framework of thought’’, they continue to heavily rely on a reductionist version of the NIS- approach that prevents such a ‘‘Southern perspective’’ to fully emerge. This creates problems for actors willing to use NIS more reflexively, and it also affects the effectivity of science, technology and innovation (STI) policies in non-OECD countries. We formulate a research agenda with three suggestions for further engaging NIS both conceptually and practically. Using such analytical perspectives, we argue, might benefit both to scholarly work about NIS, but could also allow for a better articulation with STI regimes in Southern countries.
The analytical framework used for Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) public policy design worldwide is largely based on a systemic/evolutionary approach and, empirically, it is based on countries with specific initial conditions-the central economies and some successful Asian economies. These countries have specific trajectories of institutional building, political culture and STI capabilities, which shape their National Innovation Systems (NIS). A central issue in understanding the trajectories and chances of success or failure of policies emanating from these models, and variants that aim to adapt to developing economies, is to analytically conceive the role of the institutional framework, the rules of the game in operation in the system, the governance at national, sectoral and regional levels, and some aspects of the political economy in the recipients countries. These affect the STI practice and policy, contribute to feeding tensions that militate against the building of a sustainable NIS, and are country specific. The aim of this document is to discuss the experience of STI policymaking in Mexico, considering the international model and the interaction between the trajectory of institutional building, the process of construction of both the government and governance of the NSI, and the political economy. This paper argues that a set of rules and actions are formed and built from the STI practice; they allow or block actions in governance processes. The data that will be used to inform our arguments is based on laws and regulations, transcripts of board meetings and interviews with key agents of the NSI. 2
Counterhegemonic Narratives of Innovation: Political Discourse Analysis of Iberoamerican Countries
2019
From the 1970s onwards, changes in economic theory began to draw attention to the relationship between economic growth and technological innovation. Technological innovation has come to be considered fundamental to boosting international trade, increasing productivity and generating more and better jobs, among other benefits. However, more recent academic narratives began to change through considering the importance of technological innovation for social purposes such as social inclusion and sustainable development. This recovered the concept of social innovation and alongside the development of a plethora of alternative innovation concepts – such as sustainable innovation, open innovation, responsible innovation, green innovation, among other “xinnovation” concepts (Gaglio et al. 2017). Nevertheless, l ittle is known about the extent to which these counterhegemonic concepts emerge and feature in Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) policy discourses. In this sense, this articl...
Research on Innovation and Innovation Policy in Latin America: Perception and Practice of the Nexus
On the nature of the policy-making process The many stages following STI policy design to reach decision-taking are outside the reach of researchers. Beyond theory, when it comes to define policy we are all actors with our own interests, inertias, tramps, etc. Ideological, strategic, tactical, circumstantial and personal factors interplay in policy-making and priority setting. PM want fast and simple evidence, and ambitious STI plans to leave their imprint. Little interest in learning from previous strategies and instruments. Agenda problems: a change of government or unforeseen events may suddenly affect STI priority in the policy agenda. Research findings do not easily permeate when adverse to preconceived ideas, subjacent to some PM actions. On governability and governance The 'principal and agent' relation affect STI policy and the crucial articulation between public policies and instruments. Lack of consultation tradition of PM, and of citizens' participation in STI public issues. Low empowerment of STI ministry. PM demands are discretional; they are often addressed to privileged groups. Dialogue and meetings taking place between different actors are inefficient in terms of knowledge exchange. Difficulty of collectively building an articulated policy, encompassing other social actors than PM and researchers. Lack of articulation of macro, sectorial and STI policies. Ensuing inconsistency of instruments. Institutional restrictions. Lack of a specialised bureaucracy in STI, trained to taking into account research findings as inputs for policy design. Public agencies do not exchange information on the findings of the projects they finance, to improve policy design. Public policy decisions are frequently taken without information and knowledge. Limited and/or discretional diffusion of primary data obtained by public entities (surveys). Lack of development strategies whose long-term objectives require a focus on STI (e.g., structural change). External influences Latin American mimetic: solutions adopted in the North are replicated as if problems were identical in the South. International research networks influence the setting of local research agendas. Neo-liberal times left behind a remnant of supply based policy. Source: Based on 39 interviews to members of SSH research groups on innovation in Latin America, 2009-2010.
Science and Innovation policies in Brazil: a framework for the analysis of change and continuity
2011
Abstract: This paper analyses the changes experienced the Brazilian research policy in the last 20 years. The main goal is to present a framework for understanding the central role played by the ideational dimension in setting up the nature and contents of the policy changes in the last 20 years. It describes the main features of the institutional building process underwent by the Brazilian research policies since the 1950s and analyzes changes in the S&T area since mid 1990s.
Elements of the Public Policy of Science, Technology and Innovation
Canadian Social Science, 2010
Abstract: This work analyzes the structure, elements and formulation of science, technology and innovation policy, providing examples of countries on distinct continents. The authors show that the following elements can be used as the basis for analysis of national cases: ...
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY FOR A MID-SIZE INDUSTRIAL COUNTRY. THE CASE OF SPAIN
Science and Public Policy , 1997
In this article, reforms in Spain during the last decade provided an opportunity to discuss how mid-size industrial countries can be more effective in their efforts to support scientific and technological activities. Using as a general framework the four core functions of Kline and Kash-climate setting, surveying, coordinating and gap filling-and reviewing government actions, we came up with some policy proposals. The authors understand that it is time for a second wave of reforms centered around the ideas of a) removing constraints on the mobility of researchers and on the flow of private resources to public universities and laboratories; b) decentralization of policy setting and management to regions and industry associations, following diffusion oriented strategies; c) development of a professional pool of S&T analysts within the administration directly accountable to political officials and involvement of a wider range of constituencies in planning and evaluation; d) integration of quality teams in larger structures and dissemination of resources to enterprises with the potential to engage in small-scale innovations.
Science and technology policy in Brazil: An analysis of the recent period
2011
This paper is based on the perception that science and technology policy (STP) in Brazil has followed a steady course over the last decades, regardless of each government's particular orientation. In this sense, it has acted almost autonomous. The main objective is to analyze in what degree has the agenda of science and technology policy actually changed. In this sense, we explore this policy's trajectory, emphasizing the more recent period. Based on the evidences we found in the literature and in policy documents, we conclude that although there has been some change in the discourse surrounding STP in Brazil, the policy's agenda itself has not changed significantly. We argue that this is due to the policy makers' rationale concerning science and technology.