Why Heidegger’s “History” of Metaphysics is Dead (original) (raw)
Related papers
After Heidegger and Marion: The Task of Christian Metaphysics Today
Modern Theology, 2018
Without denying legitimate criticisms of metaphysics that have been made since the time of the Reformation, the purpose of this essay is to challenge prevailing assumptions in continental philosophy and theology since Heidegger that the age of metaphysics is now over and should be replaced as "first philosophy" either by some version of phenomenology, such as that offered by Jean-Luc Marion, or by a pragmatic linguistic approach in the spirit of Wittgenstein, such as that offered by Kevin Hector. Notwithstanding the genuine merits of their proposals and concerns, it is argued here that metaphysics is not so easily dismissed, and that there is, in fact, a way to do metaphysics otherwise-a way that was taken by Erich Przywara, whose analogical metaphysics is characterized not only by an analogy between God and creation, the analogia entis, but also by an analogy between philosophical and theological metaphysics. In this, form, it is argued, not only is metaphysics impervious to the standard criticisms of "onto-theology," it also turns out to be, at its core, nothing other than a Christological metaphysics. We need not fear that the work of metaphysics has to be begun again, but it is equally true that it has to be reviewed and renewed in every age in relation of the difficulties and problems of the age.
The Critique of Onto-theology and Heidegger
This text looks into the question of God, and Heidegger's critique of the onto-theo-logical constitution of metaphysics. The specific goal is to see the setting of contra-distinction that exposes the differentiation between Hegel and Heidegger.
https://www.zetabooks.com/studia-phaenomenologica-2020-volume-20-phenomenology-and-the-history-of-platonism.html The onto-agathological fold of metaphysics: Aristotle, Plato and Heidegger-DRAFT Abstract-This paper tries to identify from Heidegger a figure of the history of metaphysics in Plato, which I call onto-agathological, parallel to the famous onto-theological figure. From a text from the 1935 course of "Einführung in die Metaphysik", I show that the history of metaphysics is not only the Aristotelian history of onto-theology, but also for Heidegger the Platonic history of the supremacy of good over being, an onto-agathological history where the concept of "fold" plays a decisive role: fold within the being itself that the good transcends but in which it participates, which responds to the onto-theological fold also within being. I thus develop the hypothesis of another history of metaphysics, in which I show the strong phenomenological content, against the Neokantians Windelband and Rickert. This article thus aims to show the Platonic content of phenomenology from the famous text of Republic 509C on the Agathon.
Martin Heidegger and his Way to Ontotheology
2021
In this article I attempt to present Heidegger's conception of the ontotheology in his late thought. I based mainly on his famous book “Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning).” In ontotheology Heidegger needs the figure of “the last god” to show the very path to being itself. It is not the God of religion, but the proper god of metaphysics, the god of other beginning, which using a sign (Wink) points Dasein the right direction. It seems to be a key to the meaning of ontotheology itself. The problem of ontotheology is presented against the backdrop of several of the most important contexts of Heidegger's thought manifested in “Contributions...”: the problem of being itself and the path to it or the problem of the last god and his sign.
Heidegger and the Problem of Metaphysics
The very issue of philosophy is the loss of the scientifical rank of its classical fundament, the metaphysics. Martin Heidegger - who had understood philosophy mostly at the age of the last century - saw this problem very well, and he saw the right direction of the solution as well. Why he failed then? This brief article tries to give an answer to this question.
2024
The article analyzes Heidegger's critique of Aristotle's bipartite approach to being and entities in the genesis of Western metaphysics. Heidegger challenges Aristotle's analysis, arguing that the integration of entities as a whole and particular entities inphysis led to a disregard for ontological difference. The German philosopher proposed that the bifurcation of being resulted in the metaphysical tradition becoming an "ontotheology." In contrast, Heidegger, through phenomenological hermeneutics, reintroduced the question of being, emphasizing the understanding of beings through the pre-logical way Daseinexists in the world, without relying on an eternal and immutable foundation
Heidegger, Luther, and Aristotle: A Theological Deconstruction of Metaphysics
This paper examines Heidegger’s concept of “facticity” in his writings from the 1920s. Heidegger’s focus on this concept, the author suggests, is keyed to Heidegger’s own rethinking of existence in terms of Luther’s and Paul’s interpretations of early Christianity. In this context, then, we gain new insight into Heidegger’s notions of temporality, of Jeweiligkeit, and also his critical appropriation of Aristotle.