A Genealogy of the Modern State (original) (raw)
2009, British Academy eBooks
I WHEN WE TRACE the genealogy of a concept, we uncover the different ways in which it may have been used in earlier times. We thereby equip ourselves with a means of reflecting critically on how it is currently understood. With these considerations in mind, I attempt in what follows to sketch a genealogy of the modern state. Before embarking on this project, however, I need to make two cautionary remarks about the limitations of its scope. I assume in the first place that the only method by which we can hope confidently to identify the views of specific writers about the concept of the state will be to examine the precise circumstances in which they invoke and discuss the term state. I consequently focus as much as possible on how this particular word came to figure in successive debates about the nature of public power. The other limitation I need to signal is that I confine myself exclusively to Anglophone traditions of thought. I do so in part because I need to bring my historical materials under some kind of control, but mainly because it seems to me that any study of the changing vocabularies in which moral or political concepts are formulated can only be fruitfully pursued by examining the histories of individual linguistic communities. To attempt a broader analysis would be to assume that such terms as lo stato, l'État and Der Staat express the same concept as the term state, and this would be to presuppose what would have to be shown. Hence the seemingly arbitrary restriction of my historical gaze.
Related papers
Waning Sovereignty? The Kindred Myths of " Origins " and " Vanishing " of the State
This article discusses, from an historical-neo-institutionalist and relational-strategic perspective, the postmodern thesis of the end of the state due to the increasing processes of world globalization. The main hypothesis is that the arguments which predict the structural crisis or the disappearance of the State in the age of neo-liberal globalization have their roots in a theoretically and historically implausible concept of sovereignty that ignores and distorts central aspects of state-hood and state-building in terms of both institutional structure and political action. The myth of the " origins " of the State in Medieval or Renaissance times shares with the postmodern vision of the " vanishing " of the state, the same underlying misconception of the scope and limits of the state power. Sovereignty (the monopolization of political power) was always a claim, a desiderata, a contested and unfinished political project not an accomplished empirical fact.
Consolati Towards a Global History of the Concept of State
POLITICS , 2020
This essay aims to explore what it takes to globalize conceptual history by dealing with two analyses of the concept of state that in different ways and with different objectives called for a reassessment of its history and for the need to make a step beyond 'methodological nationalism'. One is that of Otto Brunner, who, based on the history before the European modern state, assesses the need to disentangle constitution from statehood to be able to comprehend the social and political forces producing unity and order. The other one is that of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak who starts from colonial and postcolonial state to investigate the non-correspondence of the global history of statehood to the history of its concept and to affirm the need to understand them against the backdrop of global capitalism. Contrasting Brunner's and Spivak's positions allows highlighting some of the major theoretical challenges that a global stance on conceptual history entails.
THE EARLY MODERN STATE: A HISTORICALLY ENSNARED ENTITY
2023
A major historical object continues to raise sharp problems of method and analysis: the State . If the question of the State generates so much inquiry, debate, and methodological issues for historians of the early modern period, it is due to the combined effect of two causes. The first, in our view, lies in the immensity of the undertakings related to the analysis of the genesis of the modern State that was conducted in the 1980s-1990 ; the second is linked to the rapid transformations that the State has undergone in the last thirty years, not as an object, but as an overarching structure within which researchers situate themselves to materially conduct their research and teaching . These profound transformations have had consequences on the very definition of their scientific objects and the context in which their research is received, the methods of work, and the geographic areas studied . The conjunction of these two factors has enduringly ensnared the history of the State and, consequently, the administration and governance of the Kingdom of France.
The Concept of 'the State' in Modern Political Thought
Quentin Skinner’s magisterial The Foundations of Modern Political Thought was first published in 1978. A commemorative volume appeared almost thirty years later. My aim in this paper is less to revisit this last discussion by questioning either the importance or the impact of Skinner’s book, both of which seem to me undeniable, than it is to unsettle a few of the assumptions that not only inform The Foundations and much of the work that it inspired, but which are all too often taken for granted. In particular, I note some limitations both of Skinner’s use of the term ‘modern’ and of his understanding of political thought before concluding that it may be time to reconsider the category of modern political thought.
This Special Issue of Parergon examines the manner in which understandings of reason of state and natural law informed the conception and practice of governance of the early modern state. A series of related essays considers aspects of these evolving understandings from the perspective of the political, economic, moral, and external conduct of the state, and of those who theorized, counselled, and advised it.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.