Achieving the Olympic ideal: Preventing doping in sport (original) (raw)

Abstract

In the 1960s, prohibitionist 'anti-doping' policy was introduced to curtail the use of illicit performance enhancing substances and methods in sport. Since then, anti-doping attention and funding has been directed towards detection-based deterrence activities. However, it is now acknowledged that investment in long-term, values-based education programmes may be more appropriate. Unfortunately, research into prevention and education is in its infancy, with very little indication of best practice. Therefore, in the interim, we must draw from more developed social science research fields. The following commentary highlights the findings of a recent systematic review of factors which, to-date, have been identified as the most successful preventive approaches across four established social domains; bullying, alcohol, tobacco and social drug use. Although the systematic review highlighted no 'magical ingredients' for ensuring effectiveness, there were common 'recipes for success', including (i) targeting young participants -when attitudes and values are forming; (ii) providing interactive material that develops social skills; (iii) monitoring and delivering programmes with high degrees of fidelity; (iv) basing delivery on well-trained staff; (v) incorporating long-term 'booster sessions' to reinforce key messages. Now, research should contribute to an evidence-base that allows the discovery, application and evaluation of key elements of effective anti-doping education.

Figures (1)

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Provided for non-commercial research and education use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use.

This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Provided for non-commercial research and education use. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (13)

  1. Backhouse, S. H., McKenna, J., Robinson, S., & Atkin, A. (2007). Attitudes, behaviours, knowledge and education -drugs in sport: Past, present and future. A report for the World Anti-Doping Agency, Canada. Retrieved from http://www. wada-ama.org/rtecontent/document/Backhouse et al Full Report.pdf
  2. Backhouse, S. H. McKenna, J., & Patterson, L. (2009). Prevention through education: A review of current international social science literature; a focus on the prevention of bullying, tobacco, alcohol and social drug use in children, adolescents and young adults. A report for the World Anti-Doping Agency, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/Education Awareness/SocialScience Research/Funded Research Projects/2008/backhouse Prevention through Education final 2009.pdf
  3. Faggiano, F., Vigna-Taglianti, F. D., Versino, E., Zambon, A., Borraccino, A., & Lemma, P. (2008). School-based prevention for illicit drugs use: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 46, 385-396.
  4. Fahey, J. (2009). Are we winning the fight? Play true, 1, 1. Retrieved from http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/Resources/Publications/PlayTrue Magazine/PlayTrue 2009 1 Engaging The Athlete EN.pdf
  5. Foxcroft, D. R., Ireland, D., Lister-Sharp, D. J., Lowe, G., & Breen, R. (2002). Primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Global Commission on Drug Policy. (2011). War on drugs. Retrieved from http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/Report
  6. Hanson, J. M. (2009). Equipping athletes to make informed decisions about performance-enhancing drug use: A constructivist perspective from educational psychology. Sport in Society, 12(3), 394-410.
  7. McGrath, Y., Sumnall, H., McVeigh, J., & Bellis, M. (2006). Drug use preven- tion among young people: A review of reviews. Evidence briefing update.
  8. NICE, London. Retrieved from http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/docs/drug use prev update v9.pdf
  9. Palmer, W., Taylor, S., & Wingate, A. (2011). Adverse analyzing. A European study of anti doping organization reporting practices and the efficacy of drug testing athletes. UNI Global Union, Nyon, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.euathletes.org/uploads/media/Adverse Analyzing FINAL .pdf
  10. Sowden, A., & Stead, L. (2003). Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1.
  11. Woolf, S. H. (2009). A closer look at the economic argument for disease prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301(5), 536-538.
  12. World Anti-Doping Agency. (2009). World anti-doping agency code. World Anti-Doping Agency, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.wada-ama.org/ rtecontent/document/code v2009 En.pdf
  13. World Anti-Doping Agency. (2011). Strategic plan 2011-2016. World Anti-Doping Agency, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/ About WADA/Strategy/WADA Strategic Plan 2011-2016 EN.pdf