AJET bibliometrics and licensing (original) (raw)
BookWell
Bibliometric assessment is the combination of mathematical and statistical analysis of scholarly communication. This method has been applied to assess the strength, trends, and pattern of the published scholarly literature. Library and information professionals have been using this technique to calculate the academic contents and provide quantitative analysis. The purpose of this study is to analyze the research output published in Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS) during the period of 2009 to 2015. The data of this study have been downloaded from the website of ALIS. This result of the study provides the growth of publications by year, country-wise distribution of articles, the pattern of authorship, lengths of articles, and list of productive authors during the period under study. Keywords: Bibliometric, Annals of Library and Information Science
Bibliometric Analysis of Annals of Library and Information Studies Journal (ALISJ) during 2015 -2021
Bibliometrics is an emerging thrust area of research and has now become a well-established part of information research and a quantitative approach to the description of documents. This article brings the results of a bibliometric analysis of the journal entitled " Analysis of Annals of Library and Information Studies Journal (ALISJ)" for the period is d of 2015-2021. The result showed that a total of 212 articles were published during the study period from 2015 to 2021. Among 212 articles 99.89% of papers were published under the multiauthorship pattern. The degree of collaboration of the published articles is found to be 99.68%. Further, more than 16.50% of articles neared the domain of "Theoretical & General Aspects of LIS" Nearly 41.98% of papers were contributed by the university representative, the average length of a paper is 17.92%. All the bibliometric indicators study point toward the strengths and weaknesses of the journal which will be helpful for its further development.
International Research - Journal of Library and Information Science: A Bibliometric Analysis
2017
Paper studies bibliometric analysis of Indian open access LIS journal for five years from 2011 to 2015. Total 218 published articles were examined and analyzed for distribution of articles, authorship pattern, degree of collaboration, and geographical distribution of articles has been done. Inferences has been drawn from the analysis that journal prevalent two authorship patterns with 0.66 degree of collaboration, India as top most contributor of the articles for the journal and amongst foreign countries Nigeria is the highest contributor. Tamil Nadu is the highest contributor amongst Indian states and union territories. Journal Articles were found most prevalent source of information for writing research papers and used as citation. Calculated half-life of the journal citations found to be 9.54 years.
Forty Five Years of the Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE): A Bibliometric Analysis
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2022
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE) is a rapidly growing multidisciplinary academic journal that publishes original contributions in the Science disciplines of Biological sciences, Chemistry, Earth Sciences, and Physics, and in the Engineering disciplines of Civil, Chemical, Electrical, Mechanical, Petroleum Engineering, Computer Science and Engineering, Systems Engineering, and along with a Theme Issue on specific topic. This study uses bibliometric tools to present a retrospective analysis of research productivity during 1977-2021. The bibliometric method used to analyze AJSE's published papers based on annual growth, citation pattern, prolific authors, country, organization, funding agencies, author keyword, authorship patterns, theme analysis, most cited papers, cited references, and international collaborations. The result shows that AJSE has grown noticeably from 1977 to 2021 in total publications and citations, reaching 7658 papers and 33,846 citations. India (TP: 1324) is the country with the more number of papers contributed. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (TP: 838) found as the most contributing organization to the AJSE publications. Zhang L identified as the most prolific author with 28 publications. The most important author keywords are Optimization, Adsorption, Genetic algorithm, and Mechanical properties. Saudi Arabia and Egypt collaborated in the maximum number of AJSE research papers. This is the first bibliometric investigation of AJSE scientific literature since its establishment. Overall, the findings provide useful information to the AJSE editorial board. Its retrospective review will likely encourage readers of the journal and help the editorial team formulate research agendas and inform research strategies that will enable research scientists to contribute high-quality research papers to the AJSE.
Brainwave: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Abstract Introduction: The Journal of Indian Library Association (JILA) is an official organ of Indian Library Association (ILA), started since 1965 and published quarterly. This journal covers all aspects of Library & information Science. It is a peer reviewed journal that publishes the high-quality research articles on the subject. Objectives of the Study: To study year wise distribution of the articles, to study issue wise distribution of the articles, to find out the volume wise length of the articles, to find out the volume wise authorship pattern, to identify the degree of collaboration, to study the author's productivity, to find out the most prolific authors, to identify the year-wise growth of contributions, to study the subject coverage of articles. Purpose: The study aims to analyze bibliometric parameters such as the distribution of research articles over the years, authorship patterns, productivity of authors, growth of contributions, collaboration among authors, article lengths, and subject distribution from 2016 to 2022. Methodology: The researchers analyzed JILA data using statistical techniques to assess authorship patterns, article distribution, publication growth, collaboration, citations, and productivity, distribution of articles by subject, focusing on 2016-2022 publications. The research only considers journal articles; book reviews are excluded. Findings: The JILA published 243 articles from 2016 to 2022, with the highest number (25.10%) in 2021 and the lowest (7%) in 2016. Most of articles, 120 (49.38%), are 11-15 pages in length. Out of 240 contributors 71 (29.58%) were single authors and 169 (70.42%) joint authors, with a degree of author's collaboration (DC) of 0.70. The highest author productivity was 60 (1.02) in the year 2021, while the lowest productivity was 17 (1.00) in the year 2016. The journal covers various subjects in Library and Information Science field, with the majority of articles (60) is related to Metric studies.
BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY OF ANNALS OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STUDIES (2003 TO 2014
Author concerns the bibliometric study of the journal entitle " Annals of Library and Information studies " from the period 2003 to 2014. Bibliometric is a branch of Information science which contributed quantitative evaluation of publication patterns of all macro and micro communication along with their authorships by mathematical and statistical calculation. It can be applied to any branch of subject or subject area. Bibliometrics analysis is a process to establish the relationship between one works to other research works by mathematical and statistical calculations. The study covers the total numbers of articles, authorship pattern, subject wise classification of the contributions, geographical area wise contributions etc. The researcher founded that out of 364 articles, 124 articles contributed by single author while the rest articles were contributed by multiple authors. The study concluded merits/ demerits of the journal which will be helpful for its further evaluation. Study reveals that maximum numbers of contributions are from India.
Journal of Informetrics: Bibliometric Study of Papers Published During 2007-2021
The study examines the change in pattern of impact factor and SCImago Journal Ranking (SJR) of the journal under study from 2008 to 2021 besides examining the pattern of growth of the number of papers. The study identified the most prolific actors (authors, institutions, and countries), besides examining their citation impact in terms of citation per paper & relative citation impact. The pattern of citation and highly cited papers have also been identified. Based on the analysis of data it is observed that the number of articles published was highest and almost equal in the years 2013, 2016, and 2017. Using the methodology of the complete count of records, it is observed that 56 countries contributed 2,939 articles. China followed by the USA published the highest number of papers. The value of CPP was highest for Universidad de Granada (Spain) and Leiden University (the Netherlands). Among the authors, Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman of the Leiden University had the highest CPP. Only a minuscule number of published articles remained uncited. Article authored by Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. published in issue 11(4), 2017, 959-975 of the journal received the highest number of citations. The pattern of authorship indicates that during the first ten years, more papers were single and two-authored while during 2017-2021 more number of papers were multi-authored.
A comparison of bibliometric indicators for evaluating the top 100 Open Access Journals
Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2021
A comparative study was performed based on scientific metrics for the year 2019 for the top 100 open access journals (OAJ) extracted from the web of science. The considered bibliometric indicators are Journal Impact Factor (JIF), Eugene Factor Score (ES), Scimago Journal Ranking (SJR), Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), Cite Score (CS), Google Scholar (GS), and H5 index. This study shows that journals have different ranks compared with their metrics of the various scientific indicators. Correlations were explained by applying Pearson's and spearman's statistical correlation using SPSS software 21.0 packages. Spearman's Pearson's (r) statistical correlation was found between JIF and CS (r=0.898). Regarding spearman's (ρ) statistical correlations, the highest correlations were established between JIF and CS (ρ=0.690). It concludes that researchers and institutions cannot rely on a single indicator to measure the impact. It showed a direct linear co-relationship between the indicators, which concludes that performance measurement will be more reliable and accurate when more indicators are used for this purpose.