ENHANCING ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION THROUGH UNDERSTANDING AND IMPLEMENTING TEACHING-LEARNING THEORIES (original) (raw)
Related papers
Searching for a new paradigm in architectural education
2009
This paper is a position paper that will provide an extensive literature review on design education and raise questions regarding the current goal and a possible direction for architectural education. The paper will examine several critical issues such as education vs. training, the increasing disconnection of architectural education from the “real world” of design practice, and the role of research and theory in academia and the practice of architecture. This paper will address the challenges inherent in defining clear goals and directions for the field, given the current state of the architectural profession and academia. It will further argue that research can drive the development of a common language for use in a dialogue between the academic and the practitioner, a dialogue that is mediated by educational institutions, and which can also help shape architectural education and the profession as a whole. We are currently in a networking boom where global, intricate, and complex ...
EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING AS A BACKBONE OF ARCHITECTURE EDUCATION
Architectural Education plays an important role in shaping the profession. But in Architectural Education there is a wide gap between theory and actual practice actually we need to build the relationship between what we learn and what we build .Currently, in digital world the systems and subjects prescribed are unfortunately being taught very superficially and in isolation. "Skills of hand" has almost become obsolete, when we know for sure that the best buildings on the earth were all "hand made". For these reasons, we find ourselves today searching for ways to repair the damage with the help of Bauhaus concept i.e learning by doing or experiential learning, in which passive learning the desk listening to teacher is replaced by activity or project based learning.
The Proceedings of The Malaysia Architectural Education Conference held at Lecture Hall, Faculty Of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia on 4 -5 October 2012, 2012
This paper responds to some of the negative tendencies that continue to characterize the delivery of knowledge in architectural education. It accentuates the shift from mechanistic pedagogy to systematic pedagogy and outlines the characteristics of each. Building on critical pedagogy and the hidden curriculum concept transformative pedagogy is introduced as a form of pedagogy that can be interweaved into conventional teaching practices. Translating the premises underlying these pedagogies and building on the author’s earlier work on design studio pedagogy and the teaching practices involved, a theory that explores the integration of knowledge in architectural design education is articulated. The paper demonstrates how the theory and its underlying components and mechanisms can be applied to both lecture-based courses and design studio sittings. In an attempt to address the challenges architectural education should encounter, the implementation of the theory would offer students multiple learning opportunities while fostering their capabilities to shift from passive listeners to active learners, from knowledge consumers to knowledge producers, while positioning themselves in a challenging future professional world.
2010
Salama, A. M. (2010). Delivering Theory Courses in Architecture: Inquiry Based, Active, and Experiential Learning Integrated, Archnet-IJAR –International Journal of Architectural Research, 4(2-3), pp. 278-295. ISSN # 1938 7806. Advocating the integration of interactive learning mechanisms into theory courses in architecture, this paper responds to the misconceptions that continue to characterize the delivery of knowledge content in architectural courses. Such misconceptions are identified as: a) science as a body of knowledge versus science as a method of exploration, b) learning theories about the phenomena versus getting the feel of the behavior of the phenomena, and c) the real versus the hypothetical. Based on reviewing the literature on pedagogy the paper explores the value and benefits of introducing active and experiential and inquiry-based learning (IBL) in theory courses in architecture. A framework is developed and employed to demonstrate the way in which these types of learning can be incorporated. The development and implementation of a series of in-class and off campus exercises in two different contexts reveal that structured actions and experiences help students to be in control over their learning while invigorating their understanding of the body of knowledge delivered in a typical lecture format.
Architecture as Pedagogy: Alive and Kicking
2014
Architectural education can be valued not only as a process that delivers architecture-specific skills and knowledges, but also as a process that transforms people into critically active contributors to society. We are keen to examine how and where those skills are developed in architectural education and trace their existence and/or application within practice. We intend to examine whether some architectural and spatial practices are intrinsically pedagogical in their nature and how the level of involvement of clients, users and communities can mimic the project-based learning of architectural education – in particularly in the context of ‘live project learning’
Editorial: Affecting Change in Architectural Education (2009)
Architecture concerns not so much an explicit body of transmittable knowledge and protocols as it does a set of implicit understandings, sensitivities and sensibilities. The education of an architect therefore concerns the mission of endowing candidates with those implicit traits. This is not to say that architects do not possess and wield prodigious amounts of explicit cognitive knowledge, because they certainly do. But that explicit component of architectural know-how is actually vested in and deployed by the architect not so much because the knowledge has been invented, discovered, or developed by architects; but rather because they have assimilated it from other disciplines in a special way that gives architects adductive and hermeneutic insight into vast, detailed, and complex design challenges. Engineers make better machines, artists make more meaningful artifacts, and psychologists provide better human environments; but architects are trained to see the underlying opportunity and potential celebration of how those constituent menus might become a feast. In any unresolved complex of space, material and form, architects grasp a unique essence in how they perceive the “happily ever after” of what it might be and how that vision might be made whole and concrete. By the time a student of architecture is fully indoctrinated, this grasp of an underlying ideal essence is so potent that it becomes the student’s identity… and the purpose of that insight becomes an irresistible intention.
Seeking Responsive Forms of Pedagogy in Architectural Education, Ashraf M. Salama, 2013
2013
Salama, A. M. (2013). Seeking Responsive Forms of Pedagogy in Architectural Education, Field Journal – University of Sheffield, 5(1), pp. 9-30. ISSN # 1755-068. Seeking responsive forms of pedagogy in architectural education, this paper responds to some of the negative tendencies that continue to characterize the delivery of knowledge content in lecture-based courses. Such tendencies are identified under the headings of: a) science as a body of knowledge versus science as a method of exploration, and b) learning theories about the phenomena versus getting the feel of the behaviour of the phenomena. The paper underscores the shift from mechanistic pedagogy to systematic pedagogy and the characteristics of each. Building on critical pedagogy and the hidden curriculum concept transformative pedagogy was introduced as a form of pedagogy that can be intertwined into mainstream teaching practices. Translating the premises underlying systemic and transformative pedagogies, inquiry-based, active, and experiential learning were identified as learning mechanisms amenable to work against the two identified negative tendencies. These mechanisms were implemented through a series of exercises in a lecture-based course, I have taught in spring 2010 and 2011: ARCH 313- Community and Neighbourhood Design Workshop, offered as part of the core architecture professional program at Qatar university. The exercises involved a) critical reflection as a form of in-class active learning, b) a walking tour-PLADEW as an experience-based mechanism for learning from the environment, and c) a design game as form of collaborative learning for students’ active engagement in a classroom setting. While each exercise has its own contribution, they offer students multiple learning opportunities while fostering their capabilities to shift from passive listeners to active learners, from knowledge consumers to knowledge producers, while engaging in a wide spectrum of mental activities.
Re-adjusting the objectives of Architectural Education
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016
Architectural Education remains crucial to establish progress and social development despite the fact that it continues to face important challenges. Detached from the epochal change in evolutionary and historic terms, the efficiency of pedagogy is under question. How well do we prepare students for a very difficult future in practice? This paper focuses on the 'great chances' given by various issues in the field to redefine the core of education for our future graduates. In this context, it is required to adapt within the current critical realities by " rethinking and redesigning the teaching and learning relationship " (Garrison & Kanuka, 2004, p. 99). We believe that teaching should grasp a critical momentum, by examining what really is the object of our studies, by generating a new approach to dealing with discords within and beyond the built environment. The aim of this paper is to explore teaching that engages students' active participation through practiced-based learning in the design studio, utilizes new methods and tools and nurtures beyond disciplinary types of knowledge production. The aim is also to encourage students to identify real-life opportunities, in which they can respond optimistically, alternatively and creatively, in the hope to improve their chances to establish their future career paths.