大改革期ロシアにおける地方行政制度の再編 :1858-1864年 (original) (raw)
Shakai keizai shigaku (The socio-economic history), 2005
The purpose of this paper is to clarify the attempt to establish landownership in Manchukuo. During the Qing dynasty, in Northeast China and Eastern Inner Mongolia, landownership was restricted to the Qing, Mongolian banners (administrative units), and wanggong (Manchu princely title). At the time, according to the fengjin (closure) policy, Han Chinese (Hanren) were prohibited from migrating to Northeast China and Eastern Inner Mongolia. But in actual fact, Hanren did migrate there and became peasants, and although they could not buy land, they acquired the right to cultivation. Starting in 1935, Manchukuo undertook a land survey to investigate landownership and decided to grant peasants the right to landownership. But in the Mongolian lands of Jinzhou and Rehe provinces (Kinnetsu Mochi), land was owned by Mongolian bannermen, so it was difficult to establish landownership by other parties. Manchukuo thus had to maintain the status quo on landownership but abolished the fengjin policy, enabling peasants to purchase land.
Discussion of Soviet Marxist Historians about non-Russian Peoples in the 1920s to early 1930s
Roshia, too kenkyu, 2011
The paper discusses the controversies on the history of non-Russian peoples in the USSR among the Soviet Marxist historians in the 1920s to early 1930s. The development of early Marxist historical science in the USSR was closely related with the policies of the party. The party leaders distinguished the nationalism of the oppressing nations from that of the oppressed nations, and considered "great power chauvinism," or Russian nationalism, the main danger. Accordingly, the study of all the peoples in the USSR and the improvement of their cultural level became an important task for scholars, including historians. At the fi rst convention of the All-Union Society of Marxist Historians in December 1928 to January 1929, the study of the history of the peoples in the USSR was declared as the main task of Soviet historians. For the fi rst time, the historians faced the problem of how to interpret the history of non-Russian peoples from the Marxist perspective. One main arguing theme was the evaluation of the Russian rule over the non-Russian peoples. Another main problem was the tendency of "the great power chauvinism" of the Russian Marxist historians; this issue was raised by Ukrainian Marxist historians, including M. Iavorskii. They criticized some Russian Marxist historians for underestimating the Ukrainian elements in the history of the revolutionary movement in Ukraine and for not acknowledging the independent features of the cultural, social, and economic history of Ukraine. However, M. Pokrovskii, the most authoritative Russian Marxist historian, did not accept the criticism, and thus, the historians never reached a consensus. In contrast, the problems that became serious themes in the Stalin period, such as the evaluation of the Khan who led the rebellion of non-Russian peoples against Russia, or the evaluation of the "Holy war" by the Muslim population against Russian rule, were given less attention by the historians.
2010
Kyoto University (京都大学)0048新制・課程博士博士(地域研究)甲第15739号地博第100号新制||地||32(附属図書館)28284京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科東南アジア地域研究専攻(主査)教授 足立 明, 教授 玉田 芳史, 准教授 藤倉 達郎学位規則第4条第1項該
極東ロシア南部沿海州地域から産する三畳紀前期二枚貝化石群の古生態
2012
Kyoto University (京都大学)0048新制・課程博士博士(理学)甲第16642号理博第3754号新制||理||1543(附属図書館)29317京都大学大学院理学研究科地球惑星科学専攻(主査)准教授 前田 晴良, 教授 平田 岳史, 教授 大野 照文学位規則第4条第1項該
Removal of electric poles seen in reconstruction plans in pre-and postwar in TOKYO
HISTORICAL STUDIES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1999
During the period from the inauguration of the Tokyo Reconstruction Project to the end of World War II , all done by the project was the efforts to decrease the number of electric poles on Otsuka Roads by putting some overhead cables together on common poles. Among many plans, the Tokyo Health Road Plan and the Tokyo Postwar Reconstruction Plan were prominent. The former aimed to remove poles and billboard , building pedestrian-dedicated roads with an affluence of greenery. The latter attempted to remove electric poles from roads which are wider than 36m. Some cables still remained over head were moved to alleyways behind detouring around the roads. Further , the plan was proposing to include the common ducts and poles in the category of urban planning. The plan specified the areas from which electric poles were removed to provide educational and public space for scenic view. However, these plans were not fulfilled due to the reduction of the scale in Postwar Reconstruction Land Readjustment Project .