Judicial Discretion in ECCC Decisions on Pre-trial Detention against the Backdrop of the Case-law of the International Criminal Tribunals (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Right to Appeal a Judgment of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
That report, produced under the auspices of the Amsterdam International Law Clinic, is the basis for this article, which examines ECCC appellate procedure from the perspective of comparative criminal procedure, international human rights law and the appellate regimes applied at international criminal tribunals. The ECCC are no exception to the traditional tension between fairness and efficiency that exists in criminal proceedings across all legal systems. An additional dimension for the Chambers to consider, however, is the extreme pressure on achieving expeditious justice: pressure that comes about as a result of both the Chambers' limited resources and the extreme age of the accused This article critically assesses whether the unique circumstances of the ECCC disproportionately affect the law of appeals.
Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals, 2011
This paper encapsulates an in-depth examination of the legality of the authority invoked by the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) to create a set of rules of procedure and evidence known as the Internal Rules (IRs). In the void of public information pertaining to the ECCC's rationale for creating the IRs, this paper, in part, seeks to reconstruct the relevant judicial arguments and, to the greater extent, focuses on answering the question of which of the arguments put forward during the adoption process of the IRs should have been but were not entertained and accepted by the judicial panel to ensure the legality of the actions associated with the creation of the IRs. To this end, the paper extracts a statutory test which is used as the litmus test of the provisions of the IRs analyzed throughout the narrative. The application of this test, in the end, results in the separation of the provisions of the IRs ab initio identified as suspect into those for the adoption of which authority exists at the international level and those which the ECCC has invented ultra vires the law on the establishment of the ECCC and applicable international standards.
Provisional Arrest and Incarceration in the International Criminal Tribunals
Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 2013
This article examines the widely ignored but important issue regarding the provisional arrest and detention of persons suspected of having committed international crimes by international or internationalized courts. The paper examines the pioneer case law and practice of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, as well as the emerging practice of the permanent International Criminal Court, to evaluate how these courts have generally addressed the rights of these individuals to due process and freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention before prosecutors seek formal charges against them.
The chapter discusses several aspects of the acceptance of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) by legal professionals, political elites, as well as victims and the general public. It focuses on the verdict of the first trial, which was later overruled in a decision on by the Appeals Chamber. In 2010, Kaing Guek Eav alias ‘Duch’, was initially sentenced to 35 years in prison, which were later reduced to 19 years. However, the Appeals Chamber overruled the initial verdict and imposed life imprisonment, which proved to be a critical step in relation to the acceptance amongst different groups. Legal practitioners saw the Appeal Chamber’s decision rather critical. Some judges issued dissenting opinions in which they criticized the Chamber’s reasoning, based on a possible breach of international standards regarding the fairness of the trial. Politically, the acceptance of the ECCC seemed to be influenced by the international approval of the first verdict, as the ECCC did gain legitimacy in the eyes of many political leaders. The Appeals Chamber verdict was widely welcomed by victims; most of whom argued from a moral perspective and found the earlier Trial Chamber verdict too lenient.
LAWFUL UNLAWFULNESS: THE (NON)-PRACTICE OF INTERIM RELEASE AT THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
Interim release is the Loch Ness monster of the International Criminal Court: much discussed, rarely seen. For all its arguable simplicity and straightforwardness, the issue of interim release is a complex one. The rule seems clear: liberty is the norm, and detention the exception. Any form of detention, then, as a deprivation of the fundamental right to liberty, must presumably be a last resort, an exception, and an action not easily taken. This is a basic principle of international human rights law, and by consequence, of international criminal law. Weighing the practice of the international tribunals against these ideals, however, is a different matter. This paper will analyze interim release applications and decisions at the ICC, as well as the vociferous dissents arising therefrom, in an attempt to piece together a coherent picture of the relevant Court policy, practice and jurisprudence. While the focus of this paper is primarily on the International Criminal Court, the author shall necessarily compare ICC practice with that of the ad hoc tribunals in an effort to determine the horizontality and universality of policy across the international criminal justice paradigm. Ultimately, the paper will attempt to elucidate a delicate balance between the effective administration of international criminal justice with the necessary respect of international human rights.
Performance and Perception: The impact of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia
This report attempts to examine both how the ECCC has performed, and how Cambodians perceive its performance. It seeks first to analyze the ECCC’s record to date in meeting its primary goal of providing justice to the victims of the KR by establishing credible accountability for the highest level perpetrators and thus ending impunity for the worst crimes of the KR. Second, this report examines the court’s record in meeting its secondary goals of contributing to an improved domestic justice system, healing and reconciliation for victims and perpetrators, and a better general understanding of what happened during the KR regime. This report has two distinct parts and primary authors. The first part (Chapters I and II) focuses on the court’s compliance with international legal standards and its impact on legal professionals and the domestic rule of law system. The second part (Chapter III) addresses the views of victims and other Cambodians about the court. The report concludes by distilling broad lessons from the ECCC that might inform future hybrid tribunals.
HYBRID JUSTICE: THE EXTRAORDINARY CHAMBERS IN THE COURTS OF CAMBODIA
University of Michigan Press, 2014
More than thirty years after the fall of the Pol Pot regime, a UN-backed tribunal, fusing Cambodian and international law, procedure, and personnel, was established to try key Khmer Rouge officials for atrocities committed in the late 1970s. In this definitive scholarly treatment of the “Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia” (ECCC) from legal and political perspectives, John D. Ciorciari and Anne Heindel examine the ECCC’s institutional features, compare it to other hybrid and international criminal courts, evaluate its operations, and draw lessons for the future.