Aiming to avoid inadvertent wrong administration of medications: should drug ampoules and packaging be standardised? (original) (raw)

Medication errors in anesthetic practice: a survey of 687 practitioners

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2001

GENERAL ANESTHESIA 139 Purpose: The objectives of this study were to determine: 1) if anesthesiologists had experienced a medication error and 2) to identify causal factors. The perceived value of a Canadian reporting agency for medication errors and improved standards for labels on drug ampoules was also investigated.

Evidence-based strategies for preventing drug administration errors during anaesthesia

Anaesthesia, 2004

We developed evidence-based recommendations for the minimisation of errors in intravenous drug administration in anaesthesia from a systematic review of the literature that identified 98 relevant references (14 with experimental designs or incident reports and 19 with reports of cases or case series). We validated the recommendations using reports of drug errors collected in a previous study. One general and five specific strong recommendations were generated: systematic countermeasures should be used to decrease the number of drug administration errors in anaesthesia; the label on any drug ampoule or syringe should be read carefully before a drug is drawn up or injected; the legibility and contents of labels on ampoules and syringes should be optimised according to agreed standards; syringes should (almost) always be labelled; formal organisation of drug drawers and workspaces should be used; labels should be checked with a second person or a device before a drug is drawn up or administered.

Drug error in anaesthetic practice: a review of 896 reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study database

Eight hundred and ninety-six incidents relating to drug error were reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Syringe and drug preparation errors accounted for 452 (50.4%) incidents, including 169 (18.9%) involving syringe swaps where the drug was correctly labelled but given in error, and 187 (20.8%) due to selection of the wrong ampoule or drug labelling errors. The drugs most commonly involved were neuromuscular blocking agents, followed by opioids. Equipment misuse or malfunction accounted for a further 234 (26.1%) incidents; incorrect route of administration 126 (14.1%) incidents; and communication error 35 (3.9%) incidents. The outcomes of these events included minor morbidity in 105 (11.7%), major morbidity in 42 (4.7%), death in three (0.3%) and awareness under anaesthesia in 40 (4.4%) incidents. Contributing factors included inattention, haste, drug labelling error, communication failure and fatigue. Factors minimising the events were prior experience and training, rechecking equipment and monitors capable of detecting the incident. The information gained suggests areas where improved guidelines are required to reduce the incidence of drug error. Further research is required into the effectiveness of preventive strategies.

Standards for labelling and storage of anaesthetic medications--an audit

JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 2009

To check compliance of anaesthetist to current policies set for the use of medication within operation room and for induction room floor stock. The initial audit was conducted from 1st October to 31st November 2006 and reaudit after dissemination and sharing of results within the department repeated in July-August 2007. In each audit four operating rooms were visited twice a week. Syringes were checked for standard drug labelling for narcotic and non narcotic preparations. Drug trolley was checked for any expired drugs and whether the trolley was locked in case of operating room (OR) where list was ended or was on hold. Any unattended drug was noted and Induction room was checked twice weekly for accurate drug inventory and for standard drug storage recommendations. Labels were according to standard in non narcotic drugs on 25% syringes in first audit and 63% in second audit, likewise, narcotics labels were according to standards in 41% in first and 57% in second audit. Unattended d...

Medication errors in anaesthetic practice: a report of two cases and review of the literature

African health sciences, 2013

Mistakes in the identification and administration of drugs may be fatal. This is especially so in the practice of anaesthesia. This is a report of 2 cases of near fatality due to mistakes in drug administration from look-alike medications. To highlight the significance of medication errors in our practice and to discuss the best methods of prevention. A report of two cases of errors in the administration of drugs during the conduct of anaesthesia. The subsequent management of the cases is presented, and the findings from the literature are discussed. In case 1, an adult male presented for herniorrhaphy and after induction with propofol 1mg/kg intravenously, Pancuronium bromide injection 4 mg was administered intravenously, in the place of suxamethonium chloride injection. In case 2, For induction of anaesthesia, 100mg of thiopentone sodium was administered in place of 25mg of the same drug because Thiopentone 1 gm vial was mistaken for Thiopentone 500 mg vial in a 2 year old girl. I...

Standardizing anesthesia medication drawers using human factors and quality assurance methods

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2010

Purpose In Calgary, each of the three acute-care adult hospitals had different anesthetic medication carts with their own type and layout of anesthetic medications. A number of anesthesiologists moved among the different sites, increasing the potential for medication errors. The objective of this study was to identify the anesthetic medications to include and to determine how they should be grouped and positioned in a standardized anesthesia medication cart drawer. Methods A standardized list of medications was established. Next, the anesthesia medication cart drawer was filled and photographed, and a jigsaw puzzle was made

Wrong drug administration errors amongst anaesthetists in a South African teaching hospital

Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 2004

Wrong drug administration errors amongst anaesthetists in a South African teaching hospital of incidents. 17.5%18 of errors were classified as dangerous with the potential to cause serious haemodynamic or neurological damage. Two patients suffered harm after receiving adrenaline in error. One suffered a myocardial infarction and developed pulmonary oedema, while a second developed ventricular fibrillation requiring defibrillation. Factors blamed for the errors are shown in Figure 2. These included fatigue (23.5%), syringe labelling errors (28.4%), similar looking drug ampoules (11.8%) and other factors (20%). The latter group

Medication errors in anesthesia: unacceptable or unavoidable?

Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition), 2017

Medication errors are the common causes of patient morbidity and mortality. It adds financial burden to the institution as well. Though the impact varies from no harm to serious adverse effects including death, it needs attention on priority basis since medication errors' are preventable. In today's world where people are aware and medical claims are on the hike, it is of utmost priority that we curb this issue. Individual effort to decrease medication error alone might not be successful until a change in the existing protocols and system is incorporated. Often drug errors that occur cannot be reversed. The best way to 'treat' drug errors is to prevent them. Wrong medication (due to syringe swap), overdose (due to misunderstanding or preconception of the dose, pump misuse and dilution error), incorrect administration route, under dosing and omission are common causes of medication error that occur perioperatively. Drug omission and calculation mistakes occur commonly in ICU. Medication errors can occur perioperatively either during preparation, administration or record keeping. Numerous human and system errors can be blamed for occurrence of medication errors. The need of the hour is to stop the blame-game, accept mistakes and develop a safe and 'just' culture in order to prevent medication errors. The newly devised systems like VEINROM, a fluid delivery system is a novel approach in preventing drug errors due to most commonly used medications in anesthesia. Similar developments along with vigilant doctors, safe workplace culture and organizational support all together can help prevent these errors.

Addressing anesthesia medication errors for improved quality care

Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Medication errors in anesthesia can have serious consequences for patients, including morbidity and mortality. These errors can occur at any stage of the medication administration process, from prescribing and preparation to administration and monitoring. Learning from medication errors is essential to improving patient safety in anesthesia. To address medication errors in anesthesia, various strategies have been developed, including the use of checklists, protocols, and simulation training. The implementation of technology, such as barcode scanning and automated dispensing systems, has also been effective in reducing medication errors. Learning from medication errors involves identifying the root causes of the error, analyzing the factors that contributed to the error, and implementing strategies to prevent similar errors from occurring in the future. A culture of safety that encourages reporting and analysis of errors is crucial for learning from medication errors. Improving patie...