Ethical Considerations on Kidney Transplantation From Living Donors (original) (raw)

Kidney transplantation from related and unrelated living donors in a single German centre

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2003

Background. Organ transplantation began in 1954 with living related donation (LRD). Because of organ shortage from cadavers, unrelated kidney donation (LURD) has been proposed and shown to have good results despite complete HLA mismatching. This study aims to look at differences and similarities comparing LRD and LURD performed in our centre since the implementation of the German transplant law in 1997. Methods. Between January 1997 and July 2001, 62 out of 112 potential living donors and their recipients were accepted. Immunosuppression consisted of triple therapy (steroids, cyclosporin, mycophenolate) in patients with three or fewer mismatches, or quadruple therapy including mono-or polyclonal antibody treatment in patients with four or more mismatches or cytotoxic antibodies. LRD and LURD groups were compared for number and type of rejections, complications and kidney function at the end of observation (median 15.5 months, range 1-50 months). Results. Out of 112 pairs presenting, transplantation was performed in only 62 cases (55.4%). Reasons to deny transplantation were medical problems of the potential donors in 19, psychological problems in 13, recipient problems in seven and other reasons in 11 pairs. In 38 cases LRD transplantation and in 24 cases LURD transplantation was carried out. Recipient age was significantly lower in the LRD group (37.7"12.1 years) compared with the LURD group (53.6"7.8 years). Mean donor age was 49.7"9.2 years in the LRD group and 50.3"9.1 years in the LURD group (ns). The number of mismatches was lower in LRD (2.1"1) than in LURD (4.4"0.9) (Ps0.001) transplantation. The acute rejection rate was similar in both groups (52.2 vs 54.2%). OKT3 and tacrolimus rescue therapy for more severe rejections was more often applied in the LRD group but the difference did not reach the level of significance. There were more infectious complications in LURD transplantation (66.7 vs 36.4%, Ps0.036) and a trend towards more surgical complications in LRD transplantation (28.9 vs 8.3%, Ps0.062). One graft was lost due to transplant artery thrombosis and one recipient died 4 months after transplantation subsequent to cerebral ischaemia. Both patients belonged to the LRD group. Creatinine values at the end of observation time were 1.76" 0.6 mgudl in the LRD group and 1.62"0.5 mgudl in the LURD group (ns). Conclusion. Although kidney transplantation from unrelated donors was performed with a lower HLA match and although the recipients were older, the results are equivalent to living related transplantation. Therefore, kidney transplantation from emotionally related living donors represents a valuable option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Careful selection of donors and recipients is a prerequisite of success.

Transplant International, 1990

Since 1966, we have performed 41 renal transplants from unrelated living donors (ULD), 39 of which were "emotionally related". All donor-recipient pairs included in the present series were AB0-compatible. Recipients included 37 with primary and 4 with secondary transplants; 2 of the latter were diabetics. We compared these results to those of 41 recipients of cadaver donor kidneys matched for age, sex, immunosuppressive regimen, rank, and year of transplant, focusing our attention on the subgroups of patients under cyclosporin A (CyA) therapy (n = 24). We found that ULD transplantation was as successful as cadaver transplantation with good HLA matching: at 3 years, graft survival rates were 81% in ULD versus 86% in the control group under CyA. Moreover, grafts from ULD functioned more rapidly (no post-transplant dialysis and 70% of the patients with serum creatinine below 2 mg/dl within 3 days post-transplant). Graft tolerance was equivalent in both groups (50% of the patients experienced no rejection). We conclude that despite poor H L A matching, ULD transplantation with CyA as the basic immunosuppressive agent offers good results: benefiting from the quality of living donor kidney grafts, it helps to alleviate the persistent shortage of cadaver donors.

Annals of Surgery, 1995

The objective of this study was to analyze a single center's 28-year experience with 1000 living donor transplants. Summary Background Data The number of potential renal transplant recipients far exceeds the number of cadaveric donors. For this reason, living related donors (LRDs) and, more recently, living unrelated donors (LURDs) have been used to decrease the cadaveric donor shortage. Methods

Vojnosanitetski pregled, 2010

Background. In countries without a national organization for retrieval and distribution of organs of the deceased donors, problem of organ shortage is still not resolved. In order to increase the number of kidney transplantations we started with the program of living unrelated -spousal donors. The aim of this study was to compare treatment outcome and renal graft function in patients receiving the graft from spousal and those receiving ghe graft from living related donors. Method. We retrospectively identified 14 patients who received renal allograft from spousal donors between 1996 and 2009 (group I). The control group consisted of 14 patients who got graft from related donor retrieved from the database and matched than with respect to sex, age, kidney disease, immunological and viral pretransplant status, the initial method of the end stage renal disease treatment and ABO compatibility. In the follow-up period of 41 ± 38 months we recorded immunosuppressive therapy, surgical complications, episodes of acute rejection, CMV infection and graft function, assessed by serum creatinine levels at the beginning and in the end of the follow-up period. All patients had pretransplant negative cross-match. In ABO incompatible patients pretransplant isoagglutinine titer was zero. Results. The patients with a spousal donor had worse HLA matching. There were no significant differences between the groups in surgical, infective, immunological complications and graft function. Two patients from the group I returned to hemodialysis after 82 and 22 months due to serious comorbidities. Conclusion. In spite of the worse HLA matching, graft survival and function of renal grafts from spousal donors were as good as those retrieved from related donors.

Kidney International, 2000

Lack of Impact of Human Leukocyte Antigen Matching in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Experience at Akdeniz University

Transplantation Proceedings, 2005

Lack of expansion of the deceased donor supply has resulted in a severe shortage of organs worldwide. Spousal donors are one possible alternative organ source for patients on the kidney transplant waiting list. Despite human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) matching between recipients and unrelated donors being poor, the reported survival rates for these grafts, including spouses, are comparable to those for grafts from living related donors and higher than those for deceased donor kidneys. In 2000, our renal transplantation program began accepting living donor-recipient pairs with one or zero HLA matches. The purpose of this study was to assess this policy for accepting living unrelated donors. The 3-year graft survival rates for the transplants from living unrelated donors were similar to that for transplants from living related donors (log-rank ϭ 0.078). The number of HLA mismatches did not significantly influence the survival rates for either of these groups of living donor transplants. Multivariate analysis revealed that dialysis duration (P ϭ .057) and recipient age (P ϭ .066) negatively influenced patient survival in living donor kidney transplantation. The graft and patient survival rates for the donor transplantations were higher than those for deceased donor transplantations. In light of these findings and considering the increasing problem of organ shortage, we conclude that living unrelated kidney transplantation should be performed, with strict guidelines. Spousal donation is the most favorable form of living unrelated renal transplantation.

Impact of Donor Source on the Outcome of Live Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Experience

Nephro-Urology Monthly, 2016

Background: Renal transplantation is the ideal method for management of end-stage renal disease. The use of living donors for renal transplantation was critical for early development in the field and preceded the use of cadaveric donors. Most donors are related genetically to the recipients, like a parent, a child, or a sibling of the recipient, but there are an increasing percentage of cases where donors are genetically unrelated like spouses, friends, or altruistic individuals. Donor shortages constitute the major barrier for kidney transplantation, and much effort has been made to increase the supply of living donors. The impact of donor source on the outcome of renal transplantation is not adequately studied in our country. Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of donor source on the outcome of live donor kidney transplantation. Patients and Methods: From March 1976 to December 2013, the number of patients that underwent living renal transplantation sharing at least one HLA haplotype with their donors was 2,485. We divided these patients into two groups: (1) 2,075 kidney transplant recipients (1,554 or 74.9% male and 521 or 25.1% female) for whom the donors were living related, (2) 410 kidney transplant recipients (297 or 72.4% male and 113 or 27.6% female) for whom the donors were living unrelated. All patients received immunosuppressive therapy, consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine and prednisolone. We compared acute rejection and complication rates, as well as long-term graft and patient survival of both groups. Demographic characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. Graft survival and patient survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The percentages of patients with acute vascular rejection were significantly higher in the unrelated group, while percentages of patients with no rejection were significantly higher in the related group, but there were no significant differences regarding patient and graft survivals between both groups. Conclusions: Kidney transplant recipients who received their grafts either from live related donors or live unrelated donors had comparable patient and graft survival outcomes.

Exchange Donor Transplantation: Ethical Option for Living Renal Transplantation

Transplantation Proceedings, 2011

Purpose. Taking in consideration the opinion of our team, which necessitates obligation of a relative relation between donors and recipients (genetic or matrimonial), we performed donor exchanges as an ethical alternative in living donor transplantations. We reviewed the outcomes of our exchange series. Methods. Between July 2003 and August 2010 we performed 110 exchange donor transplantations in four hospitals: one four-way, two three-way, and 100 two-way cases. Donors were mostly spouses (n ϭ 71) or mothers (n ϭ 15). The mean age of the donors was 48.8 (range ϭ 23-69) and the recipients 41.4 years (range ϭ 5-66). Two were transplanted preemptively and the others had a mean dialysis duration of 43 months (range ϭ 1-120). Results. Among 110 patients, three compatible pairs joined the group voluntarily; 71, due to ABO incompatibility and 36, due to crossmatch positivity. Induction therapy was used in 92 patients. HLA mismatches (MM) were: one MM in three; two MM in three; three MM in 18, four MM in 36; five MM in 34; and six MM in 18. Among 90 patients tested for panel-reactive antibodies PRA, five showed class I and 10, class II positivity. In 11 patients, B-cell positivity was detected by flow cytometry. Delayed graft function (n ϭ 2), acute rejection (n ϭ 11), BK virus infection (n ϭ 1), and cytomegalovirus infection (n ϭ 3) were seen postoperatively. Three (2.7%) patients died due to sepsis. Five patients returned to dialysis program due to interstitial fibrosis tubular atrophy (IFTA) (n ϭ 2), renal vein thrombosis (n ϭ 1), de novo glomerulopathy (n ϭ 1), or primary nonfunction (n ϭ 1). The 1-and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 96%, 95% and 89%, respectively. Conclusion. We believe that exchange donor transplantation is as successful as direct transplants; it is a good, ethical alternative to unrelated living transplantations.

Ethical Considerations on Kidney Transplantation From Living Donors (original) (raw)

Related papers