Introduction: On the Limitations of Military Doctrine (original) (raw)
Related papers
Principles of the Israeli Political-Military Discourse Based on the Recent IDF Strategy Document
Relations between the military and political echelons in Israel are complex and multifaceted, both in theory and in practice. The problems resulting from the interface between the two have at times resulted in ineffective military deployment or a crisis of expectations. Moreover, as the positions of the political echelon are never unanimous, its directives to the military have not always been aligned with the government's position, and sometimes even have been nebulous. In August 2015, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) released a document entitled the " IDF Strategy " directly addressing the issue. Signed by the chief of staff, the document is notable in part for its proposal to adjust the discourse between the military and political echelons as well as to clarify the role of the chief of staff and his functional autonomy. In this document, the chief of staff suggests to the political echelon how it should formulate directives to the military so that military action will match the political objective in question, and thereby prevent a crisis of expectations. According to the document, the IDF sees its role of achieving " victory, " which does not necessarily mean defeating the enemy; the political echelon together with the chief of staff must define the concept of victory before the military is deployed. The publication of the " IDF Strategy, " unprecedented in Israel's civil-military relations, also highlights the chief of staff's sensitivity to Israeli public opinion.
IDF Strategy Documents 2002 2018 On Processes Chiefs of Staff and the IDF
Strategic Assessment, 2020
Writing and releasing strategy documents has become a norm in the IDF in the last two decades, though most were published internally within the military. This article presents the contents of the documents published from 2002 to 2018, focusing on several questions: Why was it published; what needs does it address? What was the process of developing the knowledge, and what staff work was required to prepare it? How was the Chief of Staff involved in this process? What are the main changes from previous documents? The article is also available here: https://bit.ly/2IKQiS7
This essay examines the idea of " Non-lethal warfare " and how it can and should be integrated in the framework of the IDF's military campaigns. It addresses the organizational, conceptual, and cultural barriers obstructing such a policy, and the changes required in the IDF's operating principles: establishing the guidelines; changing the concept of time in a military operational design; shifting from a structure of covert to overt campaigns that are connected to the civilian environment; and devising a supportive intelligence and operational mechanism. In practical terms, the way to promote " Non-lethal warfare " in the IDF requires focusing on four relative advantages: technological innovation; Israel's relationship with the United States and other strategic partners; utilization of the compact size of the defense establishment; and reliance on acquiring civilian know-how through the reserve system, or creating other mechanisms enabling know-how and " soft " capabilities acquirement.
The Embedded Military: Why did the IDF Perform Effectively in Executing the Disengagement Plan
Security Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Culture and Military Doctrine : The Israel Border Mission after the Arab Spring
Res Militaris, 2019
This article shows that the new, post-Arab Spring military role of the border mission in Israel is a significant part of an overall organizational change. The latter, in turn, is the product of doctrinal change in the IDF, introducing a minor defensive doctrine alongside the main offensive doctrine. The author explains this doctrinal change by cultural theory. He argues that, though influenced by the Arab Spring's structural changes, the doctrinal change is the product of an interaction between Israel's socio-political culture, highly sensitive to casualties and hesitant to authorize large-scale ground operations, and its military organization culture, that is deeply-rooted in offensive, ground warfare. The IDF decision to establish the Border Defence Array, and the way it conceptualizes and operates its mission, embody its adaptation. This adaptation seeks to prevent border incidents that could escalate to a wider confrontation which would induce a large-scale ground operation, and back the IDF offensive doctrine by freeing manoeuvring formations from the burden of “current security” mission to focus on manoeuvre training for effective use in time of war.