Assessing the transition from traditional to participatory heritage management In Turkey (original) (raw)

Unveiling forms of participation in the governance of UNESCO world heritage sites

European Spatial Research and Policy

This paper focuses on the issues of governance and participation of World Heritage sites. It inquiries how decision-making structures to locally managed World Heritage sites may encompass public participation. Through an in-depth qualitative approach, the paper analyses the World Heritage Arab-Norman Palermo and the Cathedral Churches of Cefalù and Monreale serial site (Italy). By examining the participatory dynamics that occurred during the creation and development of the selected World Heritage serial site, this paper reveals three coexisting forms of participation in WHsite decisions: inter-institutional agreement, social aggregation, and multi-actor collaboration. The main findings suggest that although formal decision-making arenas may be participative weakly, the unpacking of participatory practices in urban spaces uncovers a vibrant scene, as it emerges from the Cassaro Alto and Danisinni districts in the city of Palermo.

A participatory governance model for the sustainable development of Cumalıkızık, a heritage site in Turkey

Environment and Urbanization, 2009

This paper presents a participatory governance model adopted in Bursa, Turkey, and discusses the challenges and successes experienced to date in applying this model. The principle objectives of The Living Ottoman Village in the Third Millennium -Cumalıkızık Collaboration Project are to promote, at national and international level, high standards of quality in the fi elds of heritage conservation, architecture, urban and rural planning and to advocate for the sustainable development of the urban and rural, built and natural environments, with a participatory approach. The model puts heritage and its benefi ts in the mainstream of public consciousness and attempts to make heritage a priority for public policies. Our aim is to present the Cumalıkızık Collaboration Project, whose objective is to achieve not only the conservation and revitalization of the historical settlement but also the sustainable development of the village. Thus, it can be an important example for similar settlements.

Public Participation in Heritage Sites Conservation in Malaysia: Issues and Challenges

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013

There are escalating numbers of decay and neglect in most heritage sites cases in Malaysia. Although Malaysia has introduced the heritage and planning legislation to manage heritage sites conservation, it is timely that the public participates and accords full protection of the heritage sites. The objective of the research is to analyze the laws that govern the public participation process in heritage sites conservation and to address the problems encountered in its application. This paper is a library based research uses a qualitative approach to analyze the laws that govern public participation process in the development of heritage sites. The findings show that effective public participation depends on clear and comprehensive legislation to strengthen the compliance and implementation of the heritage related laws.

Heritage Management at the Local Level: Rhetoric and Results in the Case of Gaziantep, Turkey

International Journal of Cultural Policy, 2014

Following international trends, Turkey has recently introduced decentralisation reforms to its highly centralised public administration system. These reforms have also applied to the cultural heritage sector, where innovative laws since 2004 have allowed local administrations and private actors to play new entrepreneurial roles. The Gaziantep Metropolitan Municipality has been a pioneer in this process, promoting policies that promote cultural tourism as an engine of economic growth. Under its leadership, hundreds of historic buildings have been restored, nine new museums and heritage sites opened, and museum visitors increased tenfold. These positive results make Gaziantep an interesting case of successful decentralisation in heritage management. Despite these successes, however, the disconnection between rhetoric and results, and the fragmentation and ambiguity of responsibilities emerging from the decentralisation process raises serious questions about its sustainability and replicability.

Problems in Management and Decision Making Process for the Heritage Sites of Istanbul

REHAB-2014, 2014

Turkey recently faced a critical public reaction against the governmental projects on the Taksim including re-designing the square, demolishing the Ataturk Cultural Centre (ACC) and re-constructing the military barracks that was demolished in 1940. Although Turkey has an appreciable conservation experience and a settled conservation system with legal, organizational and managerial instruments, these projects showed the problematic points in management and decision-making process of the current system. In spite of being registered as modern heritage, Gezi Park and ACC were desired to be demolished by the government. Even though there are statutory regulations to preserve Gezi Park and ACC, the central government insisted on re-constructing the Ottoman military barrack "Topcu Kışlası" on Gezi Park . However, this project has been suspended by the government after the public reaction. This paper aims to argue how the political effects override the current legal, organizational and managerial structure by examining the Turkish conservation system.

Governance in UNESCO World Heritage Sites: Reframing the Role of Management Plans as a Tool to Improve Community Engagement

Makuvaza S. (eds) Aspects of Management Planning for Cultural World Heritage Sites. Springer, Cham, 2017

The term integrated conservation first entered the lexicon of the cultural heritage community in the 1975 European Charter of the Architectural Heritage (Council of Europe 1975) recognising that the future of that component of our heritage depends on the weight attached to it within the framework of urban and regional planning. Since then, formal recognition within the heritage community has expanded to include intangible cultural heritage and diversity of cultural expressions, the agendas of sustainability, sustainable development and climate change have re-framed the overarching context, and the role of today’s communities as both custodians and beneficiaries of the broad spectrum of cultural and natural heritage has assumed a central position in the heritage discourse alongside management, a term with diverse interpretations in practice. Expanding on the tripartite encapsulation of sustainable development in the Brundtland Report (Brundtland Commission 1987), the 2010 Toledo Declaration on Urban Development defined the multiple dimensions of sustainability as “economic, social, environmental, cultural and governance” (European Union 2010) “Good governance,” it reads, “based on the principles of openness, participation, accountability, effectiveness, coherence and subsidiarity is required in order to assure the successful implementation of public policies, a more efficient and effective allocation of public resources and to increase citizen’s direct participation, involvement, engagement and empowerment.” This concluding chapter seeks to extract key findings on multilevel governance as the key to sound management and to reframe the role of management plans in so doing.

Understanding cultural heritage in Turkey: institutional context and organisational Issues

International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2012

This paper explores Turkey’s cultural heritage system from the perspective of the ‘Heritage Chain’, which sees the heritage sector as an interconnected series of relationships and activities including protection and conservation, archaeological activity, research and museum presentation. By reviewing quantitative data along each step of the chain, we construct a holistic perspective that shows interrelationships between activities and illustrates which parts of the system are underdeveloped. By demonstrating the effects of Turkey’s distinct combination of bureaucratic fragmentation and centralisation on professional practice among conservators, archaeologists and museums, we argue for increased attention to administrative issues within heritage studies.