Moderating Effect of Index Based Livestock Insurance on Socio-Cultural Factors Affecting Performance of Livestock Projects in North Eastern Kenya (original) (raw)
Related papers
Integrating index-based livestock insurance with community savings and loan groups in northern Kenya
2015
Despite the availability of huge livestock resources, pastoralist areas of northern Kenya are characterized by chronic vulnerability to drought-related shocks1 and pastoralists’ declining coping abilities. Previously successful coping strategies include: mobility; keeping large and heterogeneous herds; herd splitting during crisis; seeking support from kin and clan networks; and knowledge of traditional early-warning systems to help minimize losses2. Given pastoralists’ declining mobility and difficulty repopulating herds, increasing numbers of ex-pastoralists are moving to towns to work as petty traders or unskilled labourers3. Though pastoralist vulnerability varies, depending on gender, poverty, social status, species of livestock kept, and degree of mobility, women and girls are at greater risk due to limited assets and decision-making power.
Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Index-Based Livestock Insurance in the North West of South Africa
Climate, 2020
Rural livelihoods in most developing countries are threatened by climate-related risks such as drought, flood, heat waves, storms, and so on. Although farmers have adopted several adaptation strategies, they have proven less effective than hoped. Hence, index-based livestock insurance, an innovation that significantly assists farmers to acclimatise to climate-related risks, has been proposed; and its adaptability has attracted a notable increase in other African countries. However, the success of its adoption is dependent on the inclination of the farmers to pay for the service. Accordingly, this study investigates their willingness to pay for index-based livestock insurance and its determinants, and the factors influencing the total livestock units to be insured in the North West province of South Africa. Cross-sectional data were obtained from 277 cattle farmers, drawn randomly from the study area. The contingent valuation method was applied to determine the farmers’ willingness t...
Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2004
This paper uses data from a survey of two hundred and fifty cattle keeping households in three cattle keeping systems; intensive, semi–intensive and extensive systems, to assess the contribution of non–market benefits of cattle to the competitiveness and survival of smallholder cattle systems in Kenya, from an agricultural development perspective. These benefits of cattle keeping are of special importance in developing countries, where livestock are closely linked to the social lives of farmers and livestock assume finance and insurance roles for households, since financial markets function poorly and opportunities for risk management through formal insurance are generally absent. A complete budget analysis of the cattle enterprise is undertaken to estimate the contribution of non-market benefits to the competitiveness of the smallholder cattle production systems. The results indicate that up to 50-70 percent of the benefits realized from the smallholder cattle systems are non-cash....
Factors affecting weather index-based crop insurance in Laikipia County, Kenya
Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 2016
Weather Index-based Crop Insurance (WII) scheme have been introduced as an innovative way of mitigating downside risk effects, especially for smallholder farmers in developing countries. The uptake and effectiveness of such a scheme, especially in Kenya is not well documented. A stratified random sampling procedure was employed to get a representative sample of 330 smallholder farm households. This paper uses a double hurdle model to establish factors influencing adoption and the eventual extent of uptake of a weather-based crop insurance, what in Kenya is referred to as Kilimo Salama meaning safe farming in English. The results show that, access to extension, perception and group membership had significant positive effects on adoption (at 1% level), household head education level (at 5% level) whilst, adoption was negatively influenced by distance to agrovet and distance to the extension agent office (at 1% level), farming experience, age of household head and size of cultivated ...