Linguistic and Cultural Aspects in Migrant Surveys: Introduction and Overview (original) (raw)
Related papers
Editorial: Research methods in ethnic and migration studies
MIGRATION LETTERS
The acceleration and diversification of the movement across borders of millions of people has recently implied a heightened relevance of topics such as ethnicity, race and migration in the social sciences. Nevertheless, being migration a highly interdisciplinary and complex issue, the diverse national academic traditions and methodologies of investigation currently existing have up to now hindered the development of a clear framework for the understanding of the phenomenon. Through this special issue HERMES (European Researchers in Migration and Ethnic Studies) attempts to provide a dedicated arena offering European researchers the opportunity to disseminate the results of their investigations in the field of migration and, in particular, of reflecting on fieldwork and/or methodological issues. The eight articles presented here all contribute – in their own ways – to the provision of a reflexive ground for the understanding of methodological choices and options and, hopefully, to th...
Surveys to Ethnic and Migrant Minorities across Europe
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2020
This report, the second in the series of reports produced by COST Action 16111 Ethmigsurveydata, presents the results from the analysis of the survey metadata compiled through the Ethnic and Migrant Minorities (EMM) Survey Registry launched by the COST Action and with the support of the H2020 project Social Sciences and Humanities Open Cloud (SSHOC). The current version of the report focuses on six countries for which the metadata is complete and controlled for quality: Croatia, Norway, Switzerland, Romania, Germany and Turkey. The report begins with an introduction about the survey metadata compilation undertaken by Ethmigsurveydata, followed by a detailed overview of the methodological approaches used to develop the EMM Survey Registry. The report is then structured into five additional sections that present the findings for the EMM surveys in these six countries in relation to their geographical and target group coverage, the definition and measurement of EMMs, the topics covered by the surveys, their technical characteristics, and their accessibility and reusability. The final section offers conclusions and recommendations for funders, data producers and data analysis.
Social Research Methods: Migration in Perspective
Migration Letters
Migration specific methodologies for research have not yet emerged in a unified manner; hence, a void in scholarship persists which has resulted in the growing dilemmas in conducting research on migrant populations. The growing attention given to the research that involves migration has not yet been passably translated into corresponding research on the methodological challenges researchers generally handle. Quantitative methods have come under criticism for not providing an in-depth description of a phenomenon. Hence many researchers employ the mixed-method approach. This allows numerical data to be supplemented by qualitative findings and contextual explanations of both researchers and researched. We argue that no way is researching in a normal condition similar to the precarious conditions migrants go through. Due to the vulnerable positions of migrants who are the main population of migration research, it demands special attention in selecting and implementing appropriate methods.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2020
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a methodology for sampling and analysing survey data from rare and elusive populations that has gained increasing attention in migration research in recent years. Since its introduction in 1997, it has been applied in numerous surveys in the field of epidemiology (mainly for the estimation of HIV/AIDS prevalence in high-risk populations) and increasingly in migration research. This article summarises some of the experiences of applying RDS to study migrant populations, in light of some of the key assumptions that the methodology builds on, pointing to the advantages, but also the limitations of this approach. If sample frames of reasonable quality are available or can be produced, this will normally be preferable to RDS. But if no sample frame is available, the RDS methodology does create opportunities for a more systematic approach to the study of marginalized migrant populations, where qualitative studies, and convenience samples thus far have dominated knowledge production.
Strategies for origin-based surveying of international migrants
Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
This paper addresses methodological challenges of investigations of international migration, including difficulties in obtaining information about representative samples of migrants and both their origin and destination location. Our project used an origin-based sample with a destination focused survey and interviewed 91% of migrants from a community in Nepal to any destination and shares techniques employed. Our procedures and high response rate constitute a significant improvement in survey methods that permit the creation of unbiased data on migrants and allow the study of migration in conjunction with origin communities.
2013
The influence of interviewers' ethnic background in a survey among Surinamese in the Netherlands Anja van Heelsum 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Existing research on response effects and race of interviewer effects 5.3 Research design 5.4 Results 5.5 Conclusion 6 Surveying migrants and migrant associations in Stockholm Gunnar Myrberg 6.1 Introduction 6.2 The project 6.3 Preparing the individual survey 6.4 Non-response in the individual survey 6.5 The associational survey 6.6 Concluding remarks 7 Comparing the response rates of autochthonous and migrant populations in nominal sampling surveys: The LOCALMULTIDEM study in Madrid Laura Morales and Virginia Ros 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Response rates in survey research: What do we know about interviewing immigrants? 7.3 The context and the study 7.4 Comparing the response rates of migrant-background and autochthonous individuals 7.5 Does trying harder pay off? The success of refusal conversion and additional location attempts 7.6 Concluding discussion 8 Non-response among immigrants in Denmark Mette Deding, Torben Fridberg and Vibeke Jakobsen 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Hypotheses linking characteristics of sample persons and interviewers with contact and cooperation 8.3 Population sampling of immigrants and Danes 8.4 Data collection 8.5 Response and non-response rates 8.6 Analyses of contact, cooperation and response 8.7 Challenges and strategies PART III INCLUDING IMMIGRANTS IN GENERAL POPULATION SOCIAL SURVEYS 9 Immigration and general population surveys in Spain: The CIS surveys Mónica Méndez, Marisa Ferreras and María Cuesta 9.1 Introduction 9.2 Immigrant population and CIS surveys 9.3 Example of a survey with a nominal probability sample: ISSP 2008 religion survey 9.4 Immigrant/foreign population in general population surveys: Barriers to participation 9.5 Concluding remarks 10 An evaluation of Spanish questions on the 2006 and 2008 US General Social Surveys Tom W. Smith 5 The influence of interviewers' ethnic background in a survey among Surinamese in the Netherlands Anja van Heelsum 5.1 Response effects Van der Zouwen (1989: 9) defines 'response effects' as those particular effects on the response that are caused by variables other than the ones which the researcher wants to measure with the stated question. Dijkstra & Van der Zouwen (1982) refer to four types of variables that can cause response effects. First, they distinguish variables that are related to the characteristics of the interviewer, which can include role dependent and role independent characteristics. Role dependent characteristics are, for example, motivation and skilfulness in interviewing in the intended manner. Role independent characteristics include, among others, ethnic background, sex, age and other personal characteristics of the interviewer, but in addition,
Springer eBooks, 2022
Mobility is a defining feature of mankind, a fact w hich led some authors even to label our species homo migrans (Bade, 2003). In recent years, however, the surging volume of human mobility in general, and of cross-border movements in particular, has situated international migration as a major driving force of social change on a global level. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs estimates that there were 173 million international migrants in 2000 and 281 million in 2020 (UNDESA, 2020). Thus, the number of individuals who live outside their country of birth has grown by more than 60% within just two decades. These figures include international refugees and asylum seekers, whose numbers have more than doubled to about 33.8 million. 1 While (formally) voluntary migration in the pursuit of happiness, career opportunities, or improved living conditions continues to predominate, migration that is forced as a result of man-made or natural disasters has grown even faster, exposing those affected to tremendous hardships. In this context, migration has come to occupy a prominent place in the public debates and political discourse of many countries around the globe. Human mobility, immigration, and emigration have profound social, economic, and political implications. To illustrate this complexity, we shall limit ourselves to mentioning a small selection of the most salient issues here. The aggregate economic effects of international migration are widely thought to be beneficial: for example, many states are
Migration and Globalization: Challenges and Perspectives for the Research Infrastructure
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
International migration of people is a momentous and complex phenomenon. Research on its causes and consequences, requires sufficient data. While some datasets are available, the nature of migration complicates their scientific use. Virtually no existing dataset captures international migration trajectories. To alleviate these difficulties, we suggest: (i) the international coordination of data collection methodologies and standardization of immigrant identifiers; (ii) a longitudinal approach to data collection; (iii) the inclusion of adequate information about relevant characteristics of migrants, including retrospective information, in surveys; (iv) minimal anonymization; (v) immigrant boosters in existing surveys; (vi) the use of modern technologies and facilitation of data service centers; and (vii) making data access a priority of data collection.
Surveying Migrants in Europe. Experiences of the Swiss Migration-Mobility Survey
IMISCOE Research Series, 2019
The increasing need for information on immigrants can scarcely be satisfied by traditional population surveys or censuses. Only migrant-specific surveys allow for the integration of migrant-specific topics. However, when organizing a survey targeting immigrants, challenges concerning the survey setup are even more accentuated compared to traditional surveys. After a short introduction, this chapter first reviews the literature on survey methodology when targeting migrant populations. Second, it provides an overview of how specific migrant surveys, which have been undertaken in Europe since the year 2000, have addressed different challenges. Third, and considering the first two chapters, it reviews the implementation of the Migration-Mobility Survey by presenting the target population, the sampling procedure, the survey design and the data collection process and response rates. The chapter closes with a short overview of the main socio-demographic characteristics of the participants,...