Workplace segregation and electoral success of right wing identity politics in India (original) (raw)
Related papers
Do Parties Matter for Ethnic Violence? Evidence From India
Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2016
Ethnic group conflict is among the most serious threats facing young democracies. In this paper, we investigate whether the partisanship of incumbent politicians affects the incidence and severity of local ethnic violence. Using a novel application of the regression-discontinuity design, we show that as-if random victory by candidates representing India's Congress party in close state assembly elections between 1962 and 2000 reduced Hindu-Muslim rioting. The effects are large. Simulations reveal that had Congress lost all close elections in this period, India would have experienced 11 percent more riots. Additional analyses suggest that Congress candidates' dependence on local Muslim votes, as well as apprehensions about religious polarization of the electorate in the event of riots breaking out, are what drive the observed effect. Our findings shed new light on parties' connection to ethnic conflict, the relevance of partisanship in developing states, and the puzzle of democratic consolidation in ethnically divided societies.
2016
This paper evaluates whether politician identity, and in particular, the party affiliation of legislators affects employment and welfare outcomes for minorities in India. I combine data on the outcome of close elections to state legislative assemblies over 18 years for 19 Indian states with data on employment and access to social security benefits to determine whether an increase in political representation by legislators belonging to India's right-wing, Hindu nationalist party, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has a meaningful and causal effect on Muslim development outcomes. Close elections provide a unique window of opportunity to capture random variation in the assignment of legislators to certain districts in India. This natural experiment allows me to isolate the effect of ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This thesis would not have been possible without the continuous support and feedback from my mentors, friends and family. I am grateful to my thesis advisor, Alan de Brauw, for his invaluable comments, suggestions and guidance throughout the research process. I also owe a special debt of gratitude to UC Berkeley PhD students Abhay Aneja and Ritadhi Chakravarti for their ideas, time and support, and for facilitating access to data. Finally, I am thankful to my parents for providing encouragement and constant support throughout my time at Georgetown University.
What Explains Ethnic Violence ? Evidence from Hindu-Muslim Riots in India ∗
2013
We utilize a unique data set on Hindu-Muslim riots at the state-level in India to investigate the determinants. We base our estimation on Negative Binomial procedure that controls for the count data characteristic of the dependent variable. Five major findings emerge. First, political competition and presence of right-wing Hindu nationalist parties in a given Indian state seems to have a positive and statistically significant impact on the number of communal riots; second, if the state legislative assembly has a majority of either a coalition government or regional or left-wing parties, it has exactly the opposite effect; third, we find no evidence of a negative impact of economic development per se on communal violence; fourthly, the greater proportion of the Muslim population, higher is the number of communal riots; lastly, past violence seems to have a positive recurring effect on the current events.
Regional Studies , 2018
Being around fifteen per cent of the total population of India, Indian Muslims constitute a significant minority that cannot be ignored by the political parties in India. Since partition, the Muslims were considered traditional Indian National Congress (INC) constituency, but the failure of the INC to stop the demolition of Babri mosque and Gujarat massacre pushed Muslims to look for other options. In this study, the impact of communal violence on the voting behaviour of Indian Muslims is studied with the help of a comparative study of Muslim voting patterns in Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, and Kerala. This paper argues that the electoral performance of Muslims and their supported party or coalition has a direct bearing on the communal violence against them. By conducting the comparative study of the electoral behaviour of Muslim voters in these three states, it is observed that the most important factor in this performance is the choices they get in a particular state. The political clout and bargaining position of Muslim voters is much better in a coalition system than in a two-party contest and they can play their cards more successfully if they have their own political party as they have in Kerala. This paper also looks at the role of police in communal violence and its relationship with electoral politics.
Majoritarian Politics and Hate Crimes Against Religious Minorities in India, 2009-18
2019
Using a state-level panel data set on the incidence of hate crimes in India, this paper implements difference in difference (DID) and triple difference in difference (DDD) research designs to estimate the causal impact of the right-wing BJP's win in the 2014 parliamentary elections on hate crimes against religious minorities (Muslims, Christians and Sikhs). Comparing the periods 2009-13 (pre-election) and 2014-18 (post-election), I find that BJP's electoral victory caused an increase in the incidence of hate crimes against religious minorities in India. JEL Codes: D72; D74
Communalism and Separatism in India: An Analysis
Due to the rise and growth of the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) with its sister organizations in Indian politics, the existence of the Muslim political elite's communal attitude, acceptance of liberalized economic policy by India and the rise in mutual suspicion and hostile attitude among both Muslims and Hindus, India may witness a violent civil war between Hindus and Muslims in the future. The clashing political and economic interests and confronting attitude from both sides may lead them to be two different nations again. The spectre of Two Nations Theory may emerge once again.
For decades, scholars and politicians have been engaging in the quest for an institutional model that prevents conflict and maintains peace in ethnically divided societies. Many propose a federal system, yet with different intentions: Segregationists argue that giving territorial autonomy to the different groups by creating homogeneous federal units will mediate political conflict and prevent secession by reducing discrimination of minorities. Integrationists reject this idea, claiming that integration in form of heterogeneous federal units promotes tolerance and thereby peace. This study sheds light on the debate by comparing India's federal states, which differ in their levels of religious heterogeneity. The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that religiously homogeneous federal units have higher levels of interreligious tolerance than heterogeneous units, lending support to the segregation thesis. However, the occurrence of communal riots in the different states does not seem to be affected by their degree of heterogeneity.
SOCIAL CLEAVAGES, MULTICULTURALISM AND EMERGING SPACE FOR STATE IN INDIA UNDER GLOBALISATION REGIME
The multiculturalism ,social cleavages and ongoing globalization movement has profound impact on the role of the state. This paper makes a historical analysis and examines the validity of Weberian discovery of the influence of religion on the political economy of India. Machiavelli had reckoned deception , falsehood and tricks to defeat an enemy as acceptable part of the statecraft, which Chanakya propounded 2000 years before. Stealing an election has been a common place event of late in the greatest democracy as much as in the largest one on the earth. This paper attempts to examine this Indian syndrome. There are several evidence of links of social fragmentation resulting in political conflict over economic policy. The conventional view of social fragmentation fails to account for a critical determinant of conflict incentives: the extent to which social cleavages based on different politically salient characteristics act to mutually reinforce versus cut across one another. This paper focuses on social cleavages based on class , caste,religion and ethnicity in India. It examines the political salience of caste and class conflicts and addresses the translation of social cleavages into political oppositions in India. This paper argues that political conflict becomes more severe when social cleavages based on class, caste and ethnicity help to mutually reinforce one another. It presents Indian evidences in order to demonstrate the link between social fragmentation and fiscal policy outcomes under liberalization regime.
India: Conflict with Minorities in the Conventional Political System. The Status of Muslims
Conflict Studies Quarterly
Hindu-Muslim conflict and riots in India are enduring intergroup conflicts in south Asia, destabilizing the region for a long time. Despite having federal democracy and secular nationalism in the political system of India, the state and its various technology of power take sides with religious groups abetting the persecution of minority Muslims as religious or ethnic groups. Among the various ethnic groups and communities living in India, Muslims are among the most deprived communities in contemporary times. In the issue of minority conflict, a permanent solution in the federal system of government has become a dream. This paper analyses India’s divergent political systems and state ideology and its failure and success in respective cases to counter communal and ethnic violence. We argue that, rather than focusing on the weakness of the existing political systems of India, the common failure to adequate power sharing can better explain these conflicts and successive persecution of m...
Democracy and Far Right Populism: Shrinking Space for Minorities in India under Modi
Since the interwar period, populist trends began emerging in the world posing challenges to democracy. However, a strong polarization amid scholars over whether populism is a threat or a byproduct of democracy became a p oint of inquiry. With Modi assuming power in India, far right populism started making inroads in India's secular democratic culture causing tremors in the country. BJP leadership has been intended at radically changing India's Constitution by incorporating its dictatorial and anti-minority Hindutva ideology at its core. Indian policies and minority specific laws reflect a far-right ideological approach of Modi government that is capable of articulating genocidal attacks, religious intolerance and fascist ma joritarianism which poses serious threats to Indian democracy. The paper aims to examine influence of Modi's far-right populism on India's democratic system and patterns through which Indian minorities have been experiencing structural violence in the form of suppression and human rights violation.