Jie Lu and Martín Camps, eds. Displacing Area, Expanding Transpacific Frames between/beyond Asia-Latin America Transpacific Literary and Cultural Connections: Latin American Influence in Asia. Palgrave MacMillan, 2020. 269 pp (original) (raw)
Related papers
East Asia, Latin America And The Decolonization of Transpacific Studies
East Asia, Latin America And The Decolonization of Transpacific Studies, 2022
This series is devoted to the diversity of encounters between Latin America and Asia through multiple points of contact across time and space. It welcomes different theoretical and disciplinary approaches to define, describe, and explore the histories and cultural production of people of Asian descent in Latin America and the Caribbean. It also welcomes research on Hispano-Filipino history and cultural production. Themes may include Asian immigration and geopolitics, the influence and/or representation of the Hispanic world in Asian cultures, Orientalism and Occidentalism in the Hispanic world and Asia, and other transpacific and southsouth exchanges that disrupt the boundaries of traditional academic fields and singular notions of identity. The geographical scope of the series incorporates the linguistic and ethnic diversity of the Pacific Rim and the Caribbean region. We welcome single-author monographs and volumes of essays from experts in the field from different academic backgrounds.
"Transpacific," Routledge Companion to Asian American and Pacific Islander Literature
Routledge Companion to Asian American and Pacific Island Literature, 2014
Transpacific" is a term that is as fluid and dynamic as the oceanic terrain it navigates. Broadly used to describe the routes and infrastructures that enable the movement of peoples and goods across and around the Pacific (as in "transpacific shipping" and "transpacific trade"), within the context of contemporary Asian American studies the concept of the transpacific has come to express the ways that different Asian, Pacific Island, and American cultures and communities mutually shape one another as they circulate throughout the region. A transpacific frame for cultural and literary analysis necessarily calls attention to the very different and often unequal circumstances that shape the conditions of these moments of contact, conflict, and exchange: for example, one of the legacies of British colonization and American militarization in the region is the use of English and English-based creoles in the transpacific literatures that this chapter will explore. In this context, transpacific cultural criticism increasingly attends to the ways that transnational affiliations that appear to exceed or transcend the boundaries of the nation have in fact been materially re-routed, revived, or inhibited by imperial histories, national cultures, and the nation-state. It is in this spirit that Yunte Huang (2008) famously defines the transpacific as a semiotic space that mediates between competing national narratives and the "authoritative regimes of epistemology" that enable them (see Huang 2008: 5). In what follows, I elaborate on this idea of the transpacific as well as several alternative transpacifics that inform the terrain of Asian Americanist literary studies, ranging from those originating in sixteenth-century trade routes; those offered by indigenous mappings of the region (drawing attention to the way that dominant economic and cultural discourses of the Asia-Pacific have placed them under erasure); analyses of the military-tourist infrastructures that span the region; and the vast ecological networks that are shaped by yet also operate independently of human agency.
The Orient, The Rim, and The World
The Routledge Companion to Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Latin American Literary and Cultural Forms, 2022
A reflection on the geocultural boundaries and disciplinary cartographies that emerge from the massive scholarship on Latin America and Asia published in the last ten years or so in the field of Latin American literary studies. These new mappings have transcended the foundational framework of the Orient and have instead paved the way for the rim and the world as the organizing paradigms of cultural contact between these seemingly remote geographical constructs. Nurtured by-and produced in tandem with-the methodologies and concerns of Asian-American studies and comparative literature departments, the concepts of the transpacific and the global go well beyond textual approaches that limit discussion of the Latin American production of Asia to the realm of orientalist representation. These paradigms stimulate a multilingual form of criticism; develop material approaches that illuminate overlooked archives; and revisit traditional texts in view of new questions of race, citizenship, and literary theory at large.
Reading Transpacific American Literature: Empire, Space, and Representation
Southeast Asian Review of English, 2021
Why transpacific American literature now? What does transpacific American literature mean at a moment when Cold War 2.0 is in full swing? How do we understand the geopolitics of the transpacific from the unique locations of East and Southeast Asia, Oceania, and North America, which Yến Lê Espiritu, Lisa Lowe, and Lisa Yoneyama historicise and theorise in terms of "transpacific entanglements"? In this special issue, we seek to intervene in the emerging field by reimagining a moment of transformation of the Asia Pacific from a space of imperial fantasy and competition to multiple sites of resistance and engagement animated by movements of people, flows of commodities, and exchange of ideas across the region (Hoskins and Nguyen, Roberts and Stephens, and Shu "Oceanic Archives").
Argentinean Literary Orientalism
2020
This series is devoted to the diversity of encounters between Latin America and Asia through multiple points of contact across time and space. It welcomes different theoretical and disciplinary approaches to define, describe, and explore the histories and cultural production of people of Asian descent in Latin America and the Caribbean. It also welcomes research on Hispano-Filipino history and cultural production. Themes may include Asian immigration and geopolitics, the influence and/or representation of the Hispanic world in Asian cultures, Orientalism and Occidentalism in the Hispanic world and Asia, and other transpacific and south-south exchanges that disrupt the boundaries of traditional academic fields and singular notions of identity. The geographical scope of the series incorporates the linguistic and ethnic diversity of the Pacific Rim and the Caribbean region. We welcome single-author monographs and volumes of essays from experts in the field from different academic backgrounds.
Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 2024
This review essay explores how two recent books, Sony Coráñez Bolton's Crip Colony. Mestizaje, US Imperialism, and the Queer Politics of Disability in the Philippines (2023) and Rosario Hubert’s Disoriented Disciplines. China, Latin America, and the Shape of World Literature (2024) undertake the methodological challenges that the study of Asian-Latin(x) American relations presents for literary and cultural studies. Although the two books have different academic audiences and disciplinary trajectories within the US academy, this review essay considers how they redefine notions of literary and cultural circulation or immobility, translation, access, capacity, incapacitation, and infrastructure. The essay argues that we can identify three methodological concerns that address specific problems related to the study of Asian Latinx American relations: an innovative interrogation of the travel literature genre, an understanding of translation as a critical practice that includes non-linguistic aspects and diverse forms of ability and perception, and a particular attention to what Diana Taylor has called the repertoire. Through two divergent comparativist itineraries – Critical Ethnic Studies and World Literature debates – the two books tackle in original ways the conditions of (im)possibility of Asia-Latin America as a geopolitical framework and archival formation.