Diaspora Românească - Realitate Proeminentă Şi Provocare Misionară (original) (raw)

Creangă şi proza basarabeană: istoricul problemei

2020

In the history of Romanian literature in Bessarabia Creangă's modelling role is exem¬pli¬fied especially during the turning periods, when the concept of literature is radicalized (years 20-30, 60, 80). Across different searches and wanderings of prose writers, namely, the organicist perspective of the structure of the Bessarabian literary phenomenon elucidates the importance of the Creangă model in overcoming the different complexes, among which, especially, of the narrow-minded Romanian.

Les origines du discours identitaire Aroumain-Roumain (1770-1878) : la construction d'une identité nationale

Ph.D. thesis (University of Bucharest - History; University of Bordeaux - Political Science), 2016

Notre recherche doctorale se propose comme objectif d’éclaircir comment s’est développé et structuré le discours identitaire aroumain-roumain (à savoir, celui qui conçoit les aroumains en tant que membres du peuple roumain), dés ses origines à la fin du XVIIIe siècle, jusqu’à l’indépendance roumaine, en 1878.Le discours identitare qui nous préoccupe a ses origines dans les écrits de Teodor Anastasie Cavalioti (1770) et de Daniel le Moscopolitain (1794). Les propos communiqués par Constantin Hagi Gehani à Johann Thunmann donnent au discours identitaire aroumain-roumain la première formulation explicite nous ayant parvenu (1773). Ces propos sont repris et développés dans les ouvrages de Constantin Ucuta (1797), Gheorghe Constantin Roja (1808, 1809) et Mihail Boiagi (1813). Les récits de voyage des voyageurs étrangers ayant traversé les Balkans entre 1800 et 1860 nous révèlent que le discours identitaire aroumain-roumain représente une reconfiguration de l’ethnicité aroumaine, oeuvrée de sorte à mettre cette ethnicité en convergence multisymbolique avec la nationalité roumaine des Daco-Roumains Nord-danubiens. Les revolutionnaires Nord-danubiens de 1848 prennent le discours en question à leur propre compte. Ils conçoivent un plan d’action politique à entreprendre aux Balkans au nom des idées soutenues par ce discours identitaire. Le plan est mis en œuvre par les agents du mouvement aroumain-roumain qui prend son essor en Roumanie après 1859 ; le mouvement emporte son premier succès important en 1878, avec le décret de Savfet Pacha – un document qui institue l’assimilation de l’ethnicité aroumaine – ayant déjà été modelée par le discours aroumain-roumain – à la nationalité roumaine. Our doctoral research sets out to clarify how the aromanian-romanian identitary discourse (namely, the one which conceives the Aromanians as members of the Romanian people) has been developed and structured since its origins at the end of the XVIIIth century, until Romanian independence, in 1878.The identitary discourse which concerns us has its origins in the writings of Teodor Anastasie Cavalioti (1770) and Daniel the Moscopolitan (1794). The points conveyed by Constantin Hagi Gehani to Johann Thunmann give to the Aromanian-Romanian identitary discourse its first explicit formulation having reached us (1773). These ideas are taken up and developed in the works of Constantin Ucuta (1797), Gheorghe Constantin Roja (1808, 1809) and Mihail Boiagi (1813). The travel writings of foreign travelers having traversed the Balkans between 1800 and 1860 reveal that the Aromanian-Romanian identitary discourse constitutes a reconfiguration of the Aromanian ethnicity, crafted so as to place this ethnicity in multisymbol congruence with the Romanian nationality of North-Danubian Daco-Romanians. The North-Danubian revolutionaries of 1848 take up the aforementioned discourse. They conceive a plan of political action to be2executed in the Balkans in the name of the ideas upheld by this identitary discourse. The plan is set in motion by the agents of the Aromanian-Romanian movement which takes root in Romania after 1859; the movement registers its first major success in 1878, with the decree of Savfet Pascha – a document which officialises the assimilation of the Aromanian ethnicity – having already been shaped by the Aromanian-Romanian discourse – by the Romanian nationality.

Istoria cărŃii româneşti. Documente de arhivă Receptarea Pravilei de la Govora-perspectivă comparativă

Dr. Gabriela Rusu-Păsărin este conferenŃiar la Facultatea de Litere a UniversităŃii din Craiova, unde susŃine cursuri de comunicare audiovizuală, comunicare politică, comunicare şi persuasiune. A publicat cărŃi, articole şi studii în domeniile: comunicare în spaŃiul public, jurnalism cultural, etnografie şi folclor. Este realizator-coordonator la Radio Oltenia Craiova (post public regional al SocietăŃii Române de Radiodifuziune), promovând astfel o perspectivă aplicată a jurnalismului cultural şi a comunicării audiovizuale. Rezumat Prima carte de legi în limba română (1640), Pravila de la Govora, sau Mica Pravilă este totodată un corpus referenŃial de tradiŃii şi credinŃe populare referitoare la ceremonialul existenŃial. Scopul este de a realiza o analiză comparativă a celor două nivele de referinŃă, mentalul tradiŃional românesc şi rigoarea bisericească, cea din urmă funcŃionând sub influenŃa stravechilor legi bizantine şi a canoanelor stabilite de sinodul Bisericii Orientale. Cred...