Economic Activity and the Short-Term Credit Markets: An Analysis of Prices and Quantities (original) (raw)
Related papers
U.S. Bank Lending Activity in the Postcrisis World
Journal of Financial Research, 2016
There are three main reasons banks may not be lending. First, banks could be rationing credit. We show that banks have excess reserves of more than $2 trillion, so demand exceeding supply is unlikely. Second, banks could be experiencing a capital crunch. We find no evidence of a capital crunch. Third, banks could be choosing to restrict lending, creating a credit crunch. We find that postcrisis loan growth rates are lower than crisis loan growth rates, but postcrisis loan growth is similar to precrisis growth. We find no evidence to suggest that banks are systematically restricting lending. JEL Classification: G01, G21 I. Introduction In the recent financial crisis, many U.S. banks were forced to write down large amounts of their assets, especially large and systemically relevant (too-big-to-fail) banks. 1 These write-downs may have led to the assertion of a credit crunch by many politicians and analysts. Comments in the media such as, "Banks are indeed showing signs of paranoia to extend new loans. The ones that are approved take much longer to close" 2 are commonplace even in 2013-2014. Accordingly, the genesis of this article is the simple question: Are banks lending after the crisis? Banks are, of course, lending after the crisis, but our basic question is intended to reflect the hyperbole in the negative press banks continue to receive. Our research question is: How does postcrisis lending compare to earlier periods? To address our Much of this paper was completed while Mark D. Griffiths was the Jack Anderson Professor of Finance at Miami University. The authors thank the reviewer (Dan Thornton) for comments to improve our paper. 1 Banks classified as too big to fail are based on whether the Federal Reserve publicly announced its requirement to be "stress tested" in April 2009 and were not classified as investment banks. The too-big-to-fail banks are BB&T,
The Great Depression as a Credit Boom Gone Wrong
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
The experience of the 1990s renewed economists' interest in the role of credit in macroeconomic fluctuations. The locus classicus of the credit-boom view of economic cycles is the expansion of the 1920s and the Great Depression. In this paper we ask how well quantitative measures of the credit boom phenomenon can explain the uneven expansion of the 1920s and the slump of the 1930s. We complement this macroeconomic analysis with three sectoral studies that shed further light on the explanatory power of the credit boom interpretation: the property market, consumer durables industries, and high-tech sectors. We conclude that the credit boom view provides a useful perspective on both the boom of the 1920s and the subsequent slump. In particular, it directs attention to the role played by the structure of the financial sector and the interaction of finance and innovation. The credit boom and its ultimate impact were especially pronounced where the organisation and history of the financial sector led intermediaries to compete aggressively in providing credit. And the impact on financial markets and the economy was particularly evident in countries that saw the development of new network technologies with commercial potential that in practice took considerable time to be realised. In addition, the structure of management of the monetary regime mattered importantly. The procyclical character of the foreign exchange component of global international reserves and the failure of domestic monetary authorities to use stable policy rules to guide the more discretionary approach to monetary management that replaced the more rigid rules-based gold standard of the earlier era are key for explaining the developments in credit markets that helped to set the stage for the Great Depression. JEL classification codes: E3, N2. 1 We thank Pipat Luengnaruemitchai and Justin Jones for research assistance and Michael Bordo, Alex Field, Charles Goodhart, and Ian McLean for comments. The views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the BIS. We dedicate this paper to the memory of Charles Kindleberger, whose passing coincided with its completion. 2 See for example Bernanke and Gertler (1999) or Tornell and Westerman (2002). 3 See Vila (2000), Borio, Fufine and Lowe (2001), and Borio and Lowe (2002). That this is the right policy conclusion is, of course, not universally agreed. On the controversy over the role of asset prices and credit conditions in the conduct of monetary policy, see Bullard and
This paper discusses the events surrounding the 2007-08 credit crunch. It highlights the period of exceptional macrostability, the global savings glut, and financial innovation in mortgage-backed securities as the precursors to the crisis. The credit crunch itself occurred when house prices fell and subprime mortgage defaults increased. These events caused investors to reappraise the risks of high-yielding securities, bank failures, and sharp increases in the spreads on funds in interbank markets. The paper evaluates the actions of the authorities that provided liquidity to the markets and failing banks and indicates areas where improvements could be made. Similarly, it examines the regulation and supervision during this time and argues the need for changes to avoid future crises. (JEL E44, G21, G24, G28)
U.S. Bank Behavior in the Wake of the 2007-2009 Financial Crisis
IMF Working Papers, 2010
The views expressed in this Working Paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to further debate.
Credit Market Shocks, Monetary Policy, and Economic Fluctuations
2012
This paper uses a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with credit market imperfections to estimate the role of credit market shocks and monetary policy in U.S. business cycles. The estimated model captures much of the historical narrative regarding the conduct of monetary policy and developments in …nancial markets that led to episodes of …nancial excess and distress over the last two decades. The estimation suggests that credit market shocks are an important factor behind economic ‡uctuations accounting for 15% of the variance in real output since 1985. Monetary policy is also an important force behind real output ‡uctuations explaining 12.5% of its variance. The impulse response functions of the estimated model show that …nancial shocks have important real e¤ects as a 0.25% rise in the external …nance premium causes a 0.73% decrease in output and a 2.8% decrease in investment.
What Happened: Financial Factors in the Great Recession
Journal of Economic Perspectives
At the onset of the recent global financial crisis, the workhorse macroeconomic models assumed frictionless financial markets. These frameworks were thus not able to anticipate the crisis, nor to analyze how the disruption of credit markets changed what initially appeared like a mild downturn into the Great Recession. Since that time, an explosion of both theoretical and empirical research has investigated how the financial crisis emerged and how it was transmitted to the real sector. The goal of this paper is to describe what we have learned from this new research and how it can be used to understand what happened during the Great Recession. In the process, we also present some new empirical work. We argue that a complete description of the Great Recession must take account of the financial distress facing both households and banks and, as the crisis unfolded, nonfinancial firms as well. Exploiting both panel data and time series methods, we analyze the contribution of the house pr...