Complex patterns of collective escape in starling flocks under predation (original) (raw)

Abstract

Collective behaviour of animals has been a main focus of recent research, yet few empirical studies deal with this issue in the context of predation, a major driver of social complexity in many animal species. When starling (Sturnus vulgaris) flocks are under attack by a raptor, such as a peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), they show a great diversity of patterns of collective escape. The corresponding structural complexity concerns rapid variation in density and shape of the flock over time. Here, we present a first step towards unravelling this complexity. We apply a time series analysis to video footage of 182 sequences of hunting by falcons on flocks of thousands of starlings close to two urban roosts during winter. We distinguish several types of collective escape by determining the position and movement of individuals relative to each other (which determines darkness and shape of the flock over time) as well as relative to the predator, namely 'flash expansion', 'blackening', 'wave event', 'vacuole', 'cordon' and 'split'. We show that the specific type of collective escape depends on the collective pattern that precedes it and on the level of threat posed by the raptor. A wave event was most likely to occur when the predator attacked at medium speed. Flash expansion occurred more frequently when the predator approached the flock at faster rather than slower speed and attacked from above rather than from the side or below. Flash expansion was often followed by split, but in many cases, the flock showed resilience by remaining intact. During a hunting sequence, the frequencies of different patterns of collective escape increased when the frequency of attack by the raptor was higher. Despite their complexity, we show that patterns of collective escape depend on the predatory threat, which resembles findings in fish. Significance statement Patterns of collective escape in flocks of starlings have always intrigued laymen and scientists. A detailed analysis of their complex dynamics has been lacking so far, and is the focus of our present study: we analysed video footage of hunting by falcons on flocks of thousands of starlings and show how patterns of collective escape (namely flash expansion, blackening, wave event, vacuole, cordon and split) depend on the preceding pattern and on details of attack. A higher frequency of attack during a hunting sequence resulted in a higher frequency of collective escape events. Flash expansion happened most often when the predator attacks at greater speed. A wave event was most likely when the raptor attacks at medium (rather than high or low) speed. These results provide a first quantitative approach to social complexity in collective avoidance of a predator.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (45)

  1. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophoton Int 11:36-42
  2. Attanasi A, Cavagna A, Del Castello L et al (2013) Superfluid transport of information in turning flocks of starlings. Nat Phys 10:691-696. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3035
  3. Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A, Viale M, Zdravkovic V (2008) Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour. Anim Behav 76:201-215. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.02.004
  4. Bialek W, Cavagna A, Giardina I, Mora T, Pohl O, Silvestri E, Viale M, Walczak AM (2014) Social interactions dominate speed control in poising natural flocks near criticality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 7212-7217. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1324045111
  5. Carere C, Montanino S, Moreschini F, Zoratto F, Chiarotti F, Santucci D, Alleva E (2009) Aerial flocking patterns of wintering starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, under different predation risk. Anim Behav 77: 101-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.034
  6. Cavagna A, Queiros SMD, Giardina I, Stefanini F, Viale M (2013) Diffusion of individual birds in starling flocks. Proc R Soc B 280: 20122484. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2484
  7. Cavagna A, Del Castello L, Dey S, Giardina I, Melillo S, Parisi L, Viale M (2015) Short-range interactions versus long-range correlations in bird flocks. Phys Rev E 92:012705. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevE.92.012705
  8. Connor RC (2000) Group living in whales and dolphins. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 199-218
  9. Core Team R (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical com- puting. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna www.R- project.org
  10. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B 202:489-511. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb. 1979.0081
  11. Feare C (1984) The dtarling. Oxford University Press, Oxford Gerlotto F, Bertrand S, Bez N, Gutierrez M (2006) Waves of agitation inside anchovy schools observed with multibeam sonar: a way to transmit information in response to predation. ICES J Mar Sci 63: 1405-1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.04.023
  12. Goodenough AE, Little N, Carpenter WS, Hart AG (2017) Birds of a feather flock together: insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science. PLoS One 12:e0179277. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179277
  13. Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295- 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5
  14. Hemelrijk CK, Hildenbrandt H (2011) Some causes of the variable shape of flocks of birds. PLoS One 6:e22479. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0022479
  15. Hemelrijk CK, Hildenbrandt H (2012) Schools of fish and flocks of birds: their shape and internal structure by self-organization. Interface Focus 2:726-737. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2012.0025
  16. Hemelrijk CK, Hildenbrandt H (2015a) Diffusion and topological neigh- bours in flocks of starlings: relating a model to empirical data. PLoS One 10:e0126913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126913
  17. Hemelrijk CK, Hildenbrandt H (2015b) Scale-free correlations, influen- tial neighbours and speed control in flocks of birds. J Stat Phys 158: 563-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-014-1154-0
  18. Hemelrijk CK, van Zuidam L, Hildenbrandt H (2015) What underlies waves of agitation in starling flocks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69: 755-764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1891-3
  19. Heppner F, Grenander U (1990) A stochastic nonlinear model for coor- dinated bird flocks. In: Krasner S (ed) The ubiquity of chaos. AASS Publications, Washington DC, pp 233-238
  20. Hildenbrandt H, Carere C, Hemelrijk CK (2010) Self-organized aerial displays of thousands of starlings: a model. Behav Ecol 21:1349- 1359. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq149
  21. Hogan BG, Hildenbrandt H, Scott-Samuel NE, Cuthill IC, Hemelrijk CK (2017) The confusion effect when attacking simulated three- dimensional starling flocks. R Soc Open Sci 4:160564. https://doi. org/10.1098/rsos.160564
  22. Imanishi K (1960) Social organization of subhuman primates in their natural habitat. Curr Anthropol 1:393-407. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 200134
  23. Inada Y, Kawachi K (2002) Order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools. J Theor Biol 214:371-387. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi. 2001.2449
  24. Ioannou CC, Guttal V, Couzin ID (2012) Predatory fish select for coor- dinated collective motion in virtual prey. Science 337:1212-1215. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218919
  25. Jolles JW, Boogert NJ, Sridhar VH, Couzin ID, Manica A (2017) Consistent individual differences drive collective behavior and group functioning of schooling fish. Curr Biol 27:2862-2868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.004
  26. Kappeler P, Shultz S, Clutton-Brock T, Lucas D (2019) Social complexity: patterns, processes, and evolution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00265-018-2613-4
  27. Kastberger G, Schmelzer E, Kranner I (2008) Social waves in giant hon- eybees repel hornets. PLoS One 3:e3141. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0003141
  28. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  29. Landeau L, Terborgh J (1986) Oddity and the 'confusion effect' in pre- dation. Anim Behav 34:1372-1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003- 3472(86)80208-1
  30. Magurran AE (1990) The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti- predator defence in fish. Ann Zool Fenn 27:51-66
  31. Magurran AE, Pitcher TJ (1987) Provenance, shoal size and the sociobi- ology of predator-evasion behaviour in minnow shoals. Proc R Soc Lond B 229:439-465. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1987.0004
  32. Nøttestad L, Axelsen BE (1999) Herring schooling manoeuvres in re- sponse to killer whale attacks. Can J Zool 77:1540-1546. https:// doi.org/10.1139/z99-124
  33. Okubo A (1986) Dynamical aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, flocks, and herds. Adv Biophys 22:1-94. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0065-227X(86)90003-1
  34. Patefield WM (1981) Algorithm AS 159: an efficient method of generat- ing random r x c tables with given row and column totals. J R Stat Soc C-Appl 30:91-97. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346669
  35. Pitcher TJ, Wyche CJ (1983) Predator-avoidance behaviours of sand-eel schools: why schools seldom split. In: Noakes DLG, Lindquist DG, Helfman GS, Ward JA (eds) Predators and prey in fishes. Developments in environmental biology of fishes, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7296- 4_21
  36. Pomeroy H, Heppner F (1992) Structure of turning in airborne rock dove (Columba livia) flocks. Auk 109:256-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 4088194
  37. Procaccini A, Orlandi A, Cavagna A, Giardina I, Zoratto F, Santucci D, Chiarotti F, Hemelrijk CK, Alleva E, Parisi G, Carere C (2011) Propagating waves in starling, Sturnus vulgaris, flocks under preda- tion. Anim Behav 82:759-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav. 2011.07.006
  38. Reynolds CV (1987) Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Comp Graphics 21:25-34. https://doi.org/10.1145/37401\. 37406
  39. Romey WL, Lamb AR (2015) Flash expansion threshold in whirligig swarms. PLoS One 10:e0136467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0136467
  40. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Kevin W, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671-675. https:// doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
  41. Shaw E (1978) Schooling fishes: the school, a truly egalitarian form of organization in which all members of the group are alike in influence, offers substantial benefits to its participants. Am Sci 66:166-175
  42. Sumpter DJ, Szorkovszky A, Kotrschal A, Kolm N, Herbert-Read JE (2018) Using activity and sociability to characterize collective mo- tion. Phil Trans R Soc B 373:20170015. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rstb.2017.0015
  43. Tinbergen N (1951) The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford
  44. Vicsek T, Zafeiris A (2012) Collective motion. Phys Rep 517:71-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004
  45. Zoratto F, Carere C, Chiarotti F, Santucci D, Alleva E (2010) Aerial hunting behaviour and predation success by peregrine falcons Falco peregrinus on starling flocks Sturnus vulgaris. J Avian Biol 41:427-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.04974.x