Implementation of the Fuzzy Analytical Network Process Method in Decision Making on the Granting of Non-occupied Building Permits (original) (raw)
Related papers
SinkrOn
The National Housing Development Public Corporation (Perumnas) was established as a government solution in providing adequate housing for the middle to lower classes, to realize this, Perumnas set a target of building 100,000 houses / year. The aspect of development is to ensure that all communities occupy decent homes in a healthy environment, an increase in the number of residents in the city, especially the city of Medan, causes settlement problems because the area of land is a fixed factor, while the population is always growing, thus requiring a system that can help decision in determining the priority of land for housing development. In this study an analysis of patterns related to applicable criteria or rules is implemented by applying the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy-AHP) method, to produce accurate and effective information for making priority decisions on the location of the best residential development land. The analysis framework uses a data collection appro...
Approach of Fuzzy Logic for Evaluation of Green Building Rating System
For rating of a green building in India, the tool 'Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment (GRIHA)' has a great role for evaluation process. Using the guidelines of GRIHA, overall rating of a green building is done based on the acquired points out of 104 after evaluation of a set of thirty four criterias by different experts independently[4]. Each criteria is well defined in terms of points and provision is kept to award the full point only after full satisfaction of the expert on the quality of works under that criteria. Naturally the membership value (µ(x)) is considered as either 1 or 0 when the experts is either fully satisfied or not. So assessment in between 'acceptable and not acceptable'; 'best and poor'; 'efficient and not efficient'; 'more and less'; 'high and low'; 'good and bed' is not possible within [1,0] due to the involvement of uncertainty. Every expert hesitates more or less on every evaluation activity...
European Journal of Operational Research, 2006
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a commonly used decision-aiding tool for resolving multi-criteria decision problems. However, users sometimes find it difficult to ensure a consistent pairwise comparison between voluminous decisions. The cause of which is that the Consistency Ratio (CR) is produced after the evaluation process and its global acceptance criteria is limited. When the derived ratio reports some inconsistency, it requires a long process to locate and rectify the problem. The major aim of this study is to look for an alternative decision-aiding tool to AHP, helping to avoid the above problem. The alternative approach proposed in this study is the Non-Structural Fuzzy Decision Support System (NSFDSS). The application of the system is illustrated with a worked example. The results generated by NSFDSS are compared against those generated by the conventional AHP that shows the effectiveness and some unique advantages of the proposed tool over AHP.
Exploring Critical Success Factors in Urban Housing Projects Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process
Population growth and increasing trend towards urbanization have caused housing demand to exceed its supply, particularly in urban areas in developing countries. Furthermore, housing industry motivates many subsidiary industries and plays a leading socioeconomic role in such countries. Therefore, successful completion of housing projects is of great significance quantitatively and qualitatively. This study aims to propose a framework to evaluate the critical success factors (CSFs) in housing projects considering the interrelationship among factors and criteria. The factors were initially identified through literature review and then refined and categorized using a two-round Delphi method and finally prioritized using fuzzy analytic network process (FANP). To demonstrate the implementation of the proposed model, a case study was carried out on an urban residential building project in Tehran. The framework proposed in this study can be applied as a decision support system for decision makers, project managers and practitioners involved in the housing sector.
Gestão & Produção, 2019
The objective of this article is to select land for commercial buildings in Rio de Janeiro city using multiple criteria decision-making techniques. The techniques used were based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Logic methods. These methods were chosen because of functionality, flexibility and great application in engineering problems for decision making involving multiple criteria. Its application was made through an opinion survey with expert builders, where 6 (six) factors for evaluation were selected in 10 (ten) commercial land alternatives. For the analytical operation of the methods, the software used were: Super Decisions and MATLAB®, respectively for each method, presenting the factors classified, in order of priority, in the selection of land, and ranking of the alternatives according to the defined scenario, facilitating in this way the process of selection of land for buildings, establishing a scientific way for the decision process.
MATEC Web of Conferences, 2019
Conditions existing infrastructure needs to be maintained, it can be operated / function, so we need a good maintenance. Operation and maintenance activities carried out in a sustainable manner, to restore, optimize, and service live function according to design life. Assessment of the condition is a link between opration and maintenance functions. If the conditions are bad, then the operation will not be optimal, which could result in malfunction. In this research, case studies assess the conditions of student dormitory buildings with prototype design. Weighting component using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process as a method of analysis. The results of the analysis show that by using the FAHP method, the weighting of building components from the assessment of the subjectivity of expert respondents can be calculated. The result of this weighting Component can be used as a calculation factor of the value of the condition of the building, and can be applied to student dormitory buildin...
The Fuzzy AHP approach for intelligent building assessment model
Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Life and Robotics, 2022
The main objective of this thesis is to probe into how Taiwanese building investment and development companies rate the analytical framework and weights of artificial intelligence buildings. Document Analysis, the Delphi method, and the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) are applied to conduct a FAHP questionnaire survey among 20 building investment and development companies in Tainan. Based on the calculation of composite weights, the findings are: (1) The most crucial evaluation indicator for security and hazard prevention is the "access control system". (2) The most crucial evaluation indicator for energy-saving management is "energy-saving technology". (3) The most crucial evaluation indicator for health and comfort is the "interior comfort system". (4) The most crucial evaluation indicator for intelligent innovation is the "intelligent innovation concept".
Fuzzy decision approach for selection of most suitable construction method of Green Buildings
International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 2017
A big challenge in sustainable projects is selection of appropriate construction method and is considered to be the decisive factor for its success. Many environment friendly prefabricated elements are entering into the market at an increasing pace. This has increased the workload and inquisitiveness of the stakeholders who will need information about their environmental, technical and esthetic aspects. The use of prefabrication in sustainable construction is advantageous but appropriate decision criteria and their weightage for applicability assessments for a project from every stakeholder's perspective is found to be deficient. Decisions to use prefabricated elements are still largely based on anecdotal evidence or cost-based evaluation rather than holistic sustainable performance. But authenticated information is seldom available and suitability within the project requirements is always debatable. Environmental decisions, being closely coupled with society's built-in uncertainties and risks, are uncertain since ecological systems as well as social systems change in the future. Thus the selection of a suitable construction method has been perceived as a multi-criteria decision-making problem highly intensive in knowledge with partial information and uncertainty. This knowledge or perception base from the minds of experts has to be collected and processed for a decision. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation method using analytic hierarchy process by Saaty has been adopted to provide an analytical tool to evaluate the applicability of prefabricated or on-site construction method.
Decision - Making Model by Applying Fuzzy Numbers in Construction Project
Multi-attribute analysis is a useful tool in many economical, managerial, constructional, etc., problems. There is usually some uncertainty involved in all multi-attribute model inputs. The objective of this work is to demonstrate how simulation can be used to reflect fuzzy inputs, which allows more complete interpretation of model results. A case study is used to demonstrate the concept of general contractor choice of on the basis of multiple attributes of efficiency with fuzzy inputs applying COPRAS method. The work has concluded that the COPRAS method is appropriate to use.
Sustainability
Due to the increasing population and earth pollution, managing construction and infrastructure projects with less damage to the environment and less pollution is very important. Sustainable development aims at reducing damage to the environment, making projects economical, and increasing comfort and social justice. This study proposes fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and improved grey relational analysis (GRA) to assess construction projects based on the sustainable development criteria. For doing so, sustainable development criteria are first identified in economic, social, and environmental dimensions using literature review, and are then customized for urban construction projects using experts' opinions. After designing questionnaires and collecting data, fuzzy AHP is used for determining the importance of sustainable development criteria and their subcriteria. Then, improved GRA is employed for assessing six recreational, commercial, and official centers in Isfahan regarding the weights of criteria and subcriteria. The proposed fuzzy AHP-improved GRA help us to prioritize construction projects based on the sustainable development criteria. The results of applying fuzzy AHP show that the weights of economic, social, and environmental criteria are equal to 0.330, 0.321, and 0.349, respectively, which are close to each other. This means that the importance of all three aspects of sustainability is almost equal to each other. Furthermore, "Having profits for the society", "Increasing social justice", and "Adherence to environmental policies" are identified as the most important indicators of sustainable development in terms of economic, social, and environmental aspects, respectively. Finally, the results of employing improved GRA determine Negin Chaharbagh recreational and commercial complex as the best project.