Ovarian Autograft After Cryopreservation. A Laparoscopic Approach in Ewes (original) (raw)
Related papers
Cryopreservation of Human Ovarian Tissue: A Review
Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, 2019
Background: Cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue has been increasingly applied worldwide to safeguard fertility in cancer patients, notably in young girls and women who cannot delay the onset of their treatment. Moreover, it has been proposed to patients with benign pathologies with a risk of premature ovarian insufficiency. So far, more than 130 live births have been reported after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue, and almost all patients recovered their ovarian function after tissue reimplantation. Summary: This review aims to summarize the recent results described in the literature regarding human ovarian tissue cryopreservation in terms of methods and main results obtained so far. To cryopreserve human ovarian tissue, most studies describe a slow freezing/rapid thawing protocol, which is usually an adaptation of a protocol developed for sheep ovarian tissue. Since freezing has been shown to have a deleterious effect on ovarian stroma and granulosa cells, vario...
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of storage duration on cryopreserved ovarian tissue using fresh and frozenthawed samples. METHODS: Seventeen fertile patients underwent an ovarian biopsy during elective laparoscopic tubal ligation. The tissue sample was divided into three parts: one part was processed fresh (FG), and two were slowly frozen, cryopreserved for 30 (G30) or 180 days (G180), thawed and analyzed. Follicular density, follicular viability, and steroidogenic capacity were assessed. RESULTS: We observed no differences between the groups in follicular density, which was assessed in hematoxylin and eosin–stained tissue sections. A heterogeneous follicular distribution was observed in the parenchyma, with a mean density of 361.3¡255.4, 454.9¡676.3, and 296.8¡269.0 follicles/mm3 for FG, G30 and G180, respectively (p = 0.46). Follicular viability was greater in FG (93.4%) when compared with the cryopreserved tissues (70.8% for G30 (p,0.001) and 78.4% for G180 (p,0.001)), with no difference in viability between the frozen samples (p.0.05). The steroidogenic capacity of the tissue was not significantly reduced following cryopreservation. CONCLUSION: The slow freezing procedures used for ovarian cryopreservation are capable of preserving follicular viability and maintaining the steroidogenic capacity of the tissue despite a roughly 30% decrease in follicular viability. Furthermore, short-term storage of ovarian tissue does not appear to compromise follicle integrity. KEYWORDS: Ovarian tissue; Cryopreservation; Tissue damage; Ovarian steroidogenesis; Tissue culture.