Patricians, Knights, or Nobles? Historiography and Social Status in Late Medieval Antwerp. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Urban History, 2016
The absence of a ‘real’ urban chronicle tradition in fifteenth-century Flanders similar to the Italian or German models has raised questions among scholars. However, there is also no satisfactory consensus on the exact meaning or contents of medieval ‘urban historiography’. Some were ‘official’ city chronicles, while others lauded patrician lineages or took the viewpoint of specific social groups or corporate organizations and reinforced construction of the groups’ collective memories. Some seem to express the literary aspirations of individual city officials or clerics with strong connections to their towns.We propose an analytical framework to identify and measure the ‘urbanity’ of late medieval chronicles, taking into account the authorship and thematic emphasis of historiographical texts, but focusing on the social environment of their circulation and the ideological strategies at work.
This article examines the knightly population of Brabant around the middle of the fourteenth century. Recent historiography on the nobility of the Burgundian Low Countries treats knighthood as simply one of the traits of the nobility. However, this article argues that in fourteenth-century Brabant, the knights can be considered a distinct estate, while the nobility as such was not similarly visible. A summons of the year 1356 provides the research population, and the focus is on two Brabantine districts: Antwerp and ’s-Hertogenbosch. Through a prospography, the knights are compared on the basis of lordship, office-holding, and military activity. It thus becomes clear that none of these elements on their own were the decisive characteristic of the Brabantine knightly estate. Rather, juridical authority, both contained in lordship and in certain offices, was the most common denominator.
The Late Medieval Manuscript Transmission of the Excellente Cronike van Vlaenderen in Urban Flanders
The Medieval Low Countries, 2016
The Middle Dutch ‘Chronicle of Flanders’ is a complex chronicle group consisting of various distinct manuscript versions. This chronicle group is generally divided into three separate ‘traditions’: the Chronicle of Jan van Dixmude, the Kronijk van Vlaenderen, and the Excellente Cronike van Vlaenderen. The most important question dealt with in this contribution is whether this subdivision still makes sense today. Research strategies on medieval chronicles shifted from a focus on the authority of a chronicle’s ‘author’ towards an increasing attention to its readers and audience. Searching for this (intended) audience makes it possible to underline the connections among various manuscripts. However, lately, a countermovement has renewed the interest in chronicles’ (scribal) authorship; it focuses on the self-fashioning aspect in historiographical works. This article argues that these methodologies are not so conflicting as has been thought previously. The manuscripts of the Middle Dutch ‘Chronicle of Flanders’ provide an ideal opportunity to analyse the relationship among medieval manuscripts on the one hand as a fluid, interwoven web of connections and networks, and as the self-fashioning project of one person or family on the other hand.