A structural perspective of the protein–RNA interactions involved in virus-induced RNA silencing and its suppression (original) (raw)
Related papers
Viral Suppressors of RNA Silencing in Plants
In eukaryotes, small RNAs play a crucial regulatory role in many processes including development, maintenance of genome stability and antiviral responses. These different but overlapping RNA-guided pathways are collectively termed 'RNA silencing'. In plants, RNA silencing serves as a major line of antiviral defense that is induced by, and targeted against viruses. As a counter-defensive strategy, viruses have evolved to encode suppressor proteins that inhibit various stages of the silencing process. These suppressors are diverse in sequence and structure and appear to be encoded by virtually any type of plant viruses. This review focuses on the novel methods of suppressor screening and revealing the characteristics of RNA silencing suppressors. We have also discussed the mechanism of suppression activity, which principally operate by modifying the accumulation, activity, and/or transmission of siRNAs through either direct interaction with the RNA species or components of the RNA silencing machinery. Finally, the biotechnological applications of silencing suppression have been considered.
Approaches to Plant Stress and their Management, 2013
Small RNA molecules play a crucial regulatory role in maintaining genome stability as well as developmental regulations through a set of complex and partially overlapping pathways in a wide range of eukaryotic organisms. Active in both cytoplasm and nucleus, RNA interference regulates eukaryotic gene expression through transcriptional repression by epigenetic modification and interaction with transcription machinery. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs/miRNAs) of 21-24 nucleotides constitute the innate defence arm against a variety of pathogens, especially viruses. Plant viruses with either DNA or RNA genomes are subjected to small RNA-directed RNA degradation. Additionally, DNA viruses are subjected to another line of defence through 'RNA-directed DNA methylations' (RdDM). On the other hand, viral-encoded proteins, called silencing suppressors (VSRs), are known to counter the defence machinery, and therefore the virus can evade the host surveillance system. Some plant viruses additionally adopt certain strategies like acquiring silencing resistant structures (some RNA virus) to evade the RNA silencing machinery and thereby shaping the viral as well as the host genome. Recently, it has been reported that particular viral proteins and viral siRNAs contribute directly to pathogenicity by interacting with certain host proteins or RNAs. Transcriptional regulation of host gene by small RNA of viral origin plays important role in pathogenesis and symptom development. Small regulatory RNAs of cellular rather than pathogen origin have also been found to play a broad role in improving the basal defence in the case of plant-virus interaction. This chapter provides key insights into the complex intricate machinery of diverse RNA silencing mechanisms, describes various evolutionary diverse strategies of viral
Viral Class 1 RNase III Involved in Suppression of RNA Silencing
Journal of Virology, 2005
Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-specific endonucleases belonging to RNase III classes 3 and 2 process dsRNA precursors to small interfering RNA (siRNA) or microRNA, respectively, thereby initiating and amplifying RNA silencing-based antiviral defense and gene regulation in eukaryotic cells. However, we now provide evidence that a class 1 RNase III is involved in suppression of RNA silencing. The single-stranded RNA genome of sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV) encodes an RNase III (RNase3) homologous to putative class 1 RNase IIIs of unknown function in rice and Arabidopsis. We show that RNase3 has dsRNA-specific endonuclease activity that enhances the RNA-silencing suppression activity of another protein (p22) encoded by SPCSV. RNase3 and p22 coexpression reduced siRNA accumulation more efficiently than p22 alone in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves expressing a strong silencing inducer (i.e., dsRNA). RNase3 did not cause intracellular silencing suppression or reduce accumulation of siRNA in the absence of p22 or enhance silencing suppression activity of a protein encoded by a heterologous virus. No other known RNA virus encodes an RNase III or uses two independent proteins cooperatively for RNA silencing suppression.
A viral suppressor protein inhibits host RNA silencing by hooking up with Argonautes: Figure 1
Genes & Development, 2010
RNA viruses are particularly vulnerable to RNAi-based defenses in the host, and thus have evolved specific proteins, known as viral suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs), as a counterdefense. In this issue of Genes & Development, Azevedo and colleagues (pp. 904–915) discovered that P38, the VSR of Turnip crinkle virus, uses its glycine/tryptophane (GW) motifs as an ARGONAUTE (AGO) hook to attract and disarm the host's essential effector of RNA silencing. Several GW motif-containing cellular proteins are known to be important partners of AGOs in RNA silencing effector complexes in yeast, plants, and animals. The GW motif appears to be a versatile and effective tool for regulating the activities of RNA silencing pathways, and the use of GW mimicry to compete for and inhibit host AGOs may be a strategy used by many pathogens to counteract host RNAi-based defenses.
Viral RNA silencing suppressors inhibit the microRNA pathway at an intermediate step
Genes & Development, 2004
RNA silencing suppressors from different plant viruses are structurally diverse. In addition to inhibiting the antiviral silencing response to condition susceptibility, many suppressors are pathogenicity factors that cause disease or developmental abnormalities. Here, unrelated suppressors from multiple viruses were shown to inhibit microRNA (miRNA) activities and trigger an overlapping series of severe developmental defects in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. This suggests that interference with miRNA-directed processes may be a general feature contributing to pathogenicity of many viruses. A normally labile intermediate in the miRNA biogenesis/RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) assembly pathway, miRNA*, accumulated specifically in the presence of suppressors (P1/HC-Pro, p21, or p19) that inhibited miRNA-guided cleavage of target mRNAs. Both p21 and p19, but not P1/HC-Pro, interacted with miRNA/miRNA* complexes and hairpin RNA-derived short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) in vivo. In a...
The EMBO Journal, 2002
Posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS) processes double-stranded (ds) RNAs into 21±25 nucleotide (nt) RNA fragments that direct ribonucleases to target cognate mRNAs. In higher plants, PTGS also generates mobile signals conferring sequence-speci®c silencing in distant organs. Since PTGS acts as an antiviral system in plants, successful virus infection requires evasion or suppression of gene silencing. Here we report that the 19 kDa protein (p19) of tombusviruses is a potent silencing suppressor that prevents the spread of mobile silencing signal. In vitro, p19 binds PTGS-generated, 21±25 nt dsRNAs and 21-nt synthetic dsRNAs with 2-nt 3¢ overhanging end(s), while it barely interacts with single-stranded (ss) RNAs, long dsRNAs or blunt-ended 21-nt dsRNAs. We propose that p19 mediates silencing suppression by sequestering the PTGS-generated 21±25 nt dsRNAs, thus depleting the speci®city determinants of PTGS effector complexes. Moreover, the observation that p19-expressing transgenic plants show altered leaf morphology might indicate that the p19-targeted PTGS pathway is also important in the regulation of plant development.
Plant viruses are inducers and targets of RNA silencing. Viruses counteract with RNA silencing by expressing silencing-suppressor proteins. Many of the identified proteins bind siRNAs, which prevents assembly of silencing effector complexes, and also interfere with their 3’ methylation, which protects them against degradation. Here, we investigated the 3’ modification of silencing-related small RNAs in Nicotiana benthamiana plants infected with viruses expressing RNA silencing suppressors, the p19 protein of Carnation Italian ringspot virus (CIRV) and HC-Pro of Tobacco etch virus (TEV). We found that CIRV had only a slight effect on viral siRNA 3’ modification, but TEV significantly inhibited the 3’ modification of si/miRNAs. We also found that p19 and HC-Pro were able to bind both 3’ modified and non-modified small RNAs in vivo. The findings suggest that the 3’ modification of viral siRNAs occurs in the cytoplasm, though miRNA 3’ modification likely takes place in the nucleus as well. Both silencing suppressors inhibited the 3’ modification of si/miRNAs when they and small RNAs were transiently co-expressed, suggesting that the inhibition of si/miRNA 3’modification requires spatial and temporal co-expression. Finally, our data revealed that a HEN1-like methyltransferase might account for the small RNA modification at the their 3’-terminal nucleotide in N. benthamiana.
Double-stranded RNA binding may be a general plant RNA viral strategy to suppress RNA silencing
Journal of …, 2006
In plants, RNA silencing (RNA interference) is an efficient antiviral system, and therefore successful virus infection requires suppression of silencing. Although many viral silencing suppressors have been identified, the molecular basis of silencing suppression is poorly understood. It is proposed that various suppressors inhibit RNA silencing by targeting different steps. However, as double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) play key roles in silencing, it was speculated that dsRNA binding might be a general silencing suppression strategy. Indeed, it was shown that the related aureusvirus P14 and tombusvirus P19 suppressors are dsRNA-binding proteins. Interestingly, P14 is a size-independent dsRNA-binding protein, while P19 binds only 21-nucleotide ds-sRNAs (small dsRNAs having 2-nucleotide 3 overhangs), the specificity determinant of the silencing system. Much evidence supports the idea that P19 inhibits silencing by sequestering silencing-generated viral ds-sRNAs. In this study we wanted to test the hypothesis that dsRNA binding is a general silencing suppression strategy. Here we show that many plant viral silencing suppressors bind dsRNAs. Beet yellows virus Peanut P21, clump virus P15, Barley stripe mosaic virus ␥B, and Tobacco etch virus HC-Pro, like P19, bind ds-sRNAs size-selectively, while Turnip crinkle virus CP is a size-independent dsRNA-binding protein, which binds long dsRNAs as well as ds-sRNAs. We propose that size-selective ds-sRNA-binding suppressors inhibit silencing by sequestering viral ds-sRNAs, whereas size-independent dsRNA-binding suppressors inactivate silencing by sequestering long dsRNA precursors of viral sRNAs and/or by binding ds-sRNAs. The findings that many unrelated silencing suppressors bind dsRNA suggest that dsRNA binding is a general silencing suppression strategy which has evolved independently many times.
Identification of an RNA Silencing Suppressor from a Plant Double-Stranded RNA Virus
Journal of Virology, 2005
RNA silencing is a mechanism which higher plants and animals have evolved to defend against viral infection in addition to regulation of gene expression for growth and development. As a counterdefense, many plant and some animal viruses studied to date encode RNA silencing suppressors (RSS) that interfere with various steps of the silencing pathway. In this study, we report the first identification of an RSS from a plant double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) virus. Pns10, encoded by S10 of Rice dwarf phytoreovirus RDV), exhibited RSS activity in coinfiltration assays with the reporter green fluorescent protein (GFP) in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana line 16c carrying GFP. The other gene segments of the RDV genome did not have such a function. Pns10 suppressed local and systemic silencing induced by sense RNA but did not interfere with local and systemic silencing induced by dsRNA. Expression of Pns10 also increased the expression of -glucuronidase in transient assays and enhanced Potato virus X pathogenicity in N. benthamiana. Collectively, our results establish Pns10 as an RSS encoded by a plant dsRNA virus and further suggest that Pns10 targets an upstream step of dsRNA formation in the RNA silencing pathway.