The Spatio-Temporal Analysis of the Use and Usability Problems of EV Workplace Charging Facilities (original) (raw)
Related papers
EV Workplace Charging Energy Use and Cost Case Study
2016
The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated in the interest of information exchange under the sponsorship of UCF and the
Charging of electric vehicles and potential for end user flexibility: Case study from Norway
2021
Background Norway is currently in the process of replacing internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles with electric vehicles (EV). The steadily increasing number of EVs being charged in the mornings and evenings in Norway has added strain to local electricity grids. This article presents findings from a qualitative study of participants in one Norwegian demonstration project on smart EV charging, which intends to make charging more flexible. In order to establish a systematic overview of the relationship between everyday complexities and EV charging end user flexibility, we employ a domestication theory approach and analyze how different charging practices becomes a part of everyday life. Result In this paper we argue that the domestication theory approach, with its focus on symbolic, practical, and cognitive aspects of technology use and appropriation, highlights how EV uptake and ancillary technologies is modulated by a wide array of factors. Our findings present four different mot...
A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2018
This paper presents a literature review of studies that investigate infrastructure needs to support the market introduction of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). It focuses on literature relating to consumer preferences for charging infrastructure, and how consumers interact with and use this infrastructure. This includes studies that use questionnaire surveys, interviews, modelling, GPS data from vehicles, and data from electric vehicle charging equipment. These studies indicate that the most important location for PEV charging is at home, followed by work, and then public locations. Studies have found that more effort is needed to ensure consumers have easy access to PEV charging and that charging at home, work, or public locations should not be free of cost. Research indicates that PEV charging will not impact electricity grids on the short term, however charging may need to be managed when the vehicles are deployed in greater numbers. In some areas of study the literature is not sufficiently mature to draw any conclusions from. More research is especially needed to determine how much infrastructure is needed to support the roll out of PEVs. This paper ends with policy implications and suggests avenues of future research. 1. Introduction Plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs), which include both battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), are more efficient and less polluting than the majority of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) (Jochem et al., 2015a; Nordelöf
Smart City 360°, 2016
The car has become ubiquitous in late modern society. Electric vehicles (EVs) show potential to reduce environmental burdens of the transport sector. EV-niche market acquires more available and reliable charging infrastructure to support current and potential users. The location-allocation of the recharging facilities is not a new planning problem; however, the planning for newly-adopted low carbon emissions vehicles infrastructure has distinctive design requirements, sociotechnical and demographic factors. This paper reports on the end-user's insight and perceptions. Using ethnographic approach, an interview-based study was carried out addressing 15 EV-users in the North East of England. The sample covered a wide spectrum of active EV-users. Clustering analysis is employed as a dimensional technique for data mining and forming the participants' charging profiles. The model generated 3 clusters; each one is presented and discussed. This study presents a new way of capturing the social aspect of the EV-system and reports on qualitative techniques in EV-context.
Energy Research & Social Science, 2020
Widespread adoption of Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEVs) would add substantially to overall electricity demand, while increasing deployment of renewable supply sources will make supply-demand balancing more difficult. Early PEV market experience suggests that users preferentially charge their vehicles in the early evening, when other demands are high. Managed (or Smart) charging aims to shift PEV charging load to times when other demands are low, to facilitate better integration into the wider energy system, operation within network constraints, and minimisation of future network reinforcement costs. However, material effectiveness would require mass engagement with managed charging. To gain initial insight into the potential for managed charging, 60 semi-structured interviews were carried out with actual or potential UK PEV users. Interviews explored present charging behaviour and responses to two types of managed charging schemes, user-managed charging (UMC) based on time-of-use tariffs, and supplier-managed charging (SMC). Participants' willingness to engage with either was conditional on large reductions in charging costs. UMC was preferred over SMC, because of perceived personal control and lower perceived risk that a vehicle might not be fully charged at the required time. Preference for SMC was based mainly on perceived advantages to society as a whole. 1.1. MC concepts This study distinguished two main categories of MC, that differ with respect to who controls the timing of charging: User-managed charging (UMC): Often referred to elsewhere as Timeof-Use (ToU) tariffs 2 ; the consumer determines the timing of charging,
Charge up then charge out? Drivers' perceptions and experiences of electric vehicles in the UK
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2014
Highlights • Electric vehicle drivers preferred recharging over refuelling their conventional vehicle. • Recharging behaviour became more flexible over time. • Drivers used their EV without relying on the public charging infrastructure. • Drivers’ awareness of the environmental impact of driving changed during the trial
A week in the life of a car: a nuanced view of possible EV charging regimes
ECEEE Summer Study Proceedings, 2019
In thinking about the charging and associated energy requirements of plug-in vehicles, spatial and temporal forecasts of electricity demand tend to rely on analysis of individual car usage. These are derived from travel diary studies or, increasingly , GPS traces to provide diurnal, weekly and seasonal patterns by different people in different places. More accurate forecasts of electricity demand require knowledge of the patterns of the individual cars themselves-where they will be, when, for how long, and with what likely level of battery charge. We present a two-stage optimal matching analysis of the 2016 UK National Travel Survey (NTS) to classify cars based on their patterns of use over a week. This required a novel reconfiguration of NTS data into a 'vehicle travel diary' dataset, to which sequence and cluster analysis of individual vehicle use sequences were applied. Firstly, each of the seven days of the travel diary was subdivided into 48 half hour time slots with cars recorded either in use or not in use at any point in each slot. From this, six types of 'car day' were identified, with less than half of those exhibiting the stereotypical pattern of 'morning-out and evening-home'. These six rhythms are exhibited by different groups of cars, and in different proportions on different days of the week. Secondly, each car was attached with their own set of 7 x daily rhythms using the car-day types and then grouped with cars with similar 'lifestyle' across the week. Here we found eight clusters of car-weeks, each with different rhythms within and across weekdays and weekends. We examine how these car 'lifestyles' are associated with household and vehicle characteristics using a broad range of variables available within the NTS. Finally, we contrast these findings to assumptions commonly being made in assessments of the impacts of electric vehicle grid integration. A key finding is that as electric vehicle use becomes more common in wider sections of the population, the present clustering of charging needs at times of relatively high electricity demand may become a more spread pattern, making power demand peaks somewhat easier to manage.
The roles of users in electric, shared and automated mobility transitions
This paper synthesizes insights from 19 peer-reviewed articles published in this Special Issue on the roles of users in electric, shared and automated mobility. While many researchers and stakeholders remain inspired by the potential low costs and societal benefits of these innovations, less is known about the real-world potential for uptake and usage. To better understand the likelihood and impacts of widespread uptake, we explore the perceptions of actual and potential users, including drivers, passengers, owners, and members, as well as other stakeholders such as pedestrians, planners, and policymakers. The Special Issue examines a range of cases, including plug-in electric vehicles, car-share and bike-share programs, ride-hailing and automated vehicles. For each innovation , we organize insights on user perceptions of benefits and drawbacks into four categories. Much of the research to date focuses on the first category, private-functional perceptions, mainly total cost of ownership (e.g., $/km), time use and comfort. Our synthesis however spans to the three other categories for each innovation: private-symbolic perceptions include the potential for social signaling and communicating identity; societal-functional perceptions include GHG emissions , public safety and noise; and societal-symbolic perceptions include inspiring pro-societal behavior in others, and the potential to combat or reinforce the status quo system of "auto-mobility". Further, our synthesis demonstrates how different theories and methods can be more or less equipped to "see" different perception categories. We also summarize findings regarding the characteristics of early users, as well as practical insights for strategies and policies seeking so-cietally-beneficial outcomes from mass deployment of these innovations.
Fleets’ motivations for plug-in vehicle adoption and usage: U.K. case studies
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019
Adoption of Plug-in Vehicles (PiVs) by fleets could have a substantial impact on national energy systems. We carried out four in-depth case studies with U.K. fleets that had not yet adopted PiVs to investigate what influences their vehicle selection decisions, and what their potential charging profiles would be if they adopted PiVs. The case studies involved us carrying out interviews with staff in a variety of roles at different levels within each organisation. We found that operational suitability and costs of ownership were the most important vehicle selection considerations. Provision of charging facilities at employees' homes was seen as a major barrier to PiV adoption by van fleets, as were government contract regulations applying to contractors working for public sector clients. In car fleets where users chose their own vehicles, those choices were made at the personal level, but constrained by criteria imposed by the organisation. The range of vehicle options for users reflected corporate goals such as providing employee benefits, and also corporate views of personal-level symbolic motivations for car choice. PiVs were not considered to reflect such motivations so were not offered as options. Home-based fleet PiVs are likely to be charged mainly in the evenings and overnight, since in the daytime they are in use on company business. In conclusion home-based fleet PiVs may contribute to the early evening electricity demand peak; but there appear to be additional barriers to PiV adoption by fleets that may limit their overall impact on the U.K. energy system.