Effect of Intercropping on Yield of Maize Hybrids with Mungbean (original) (raw)
Related papers
Yield performance of mungbean maize intercropping grown under different planting geometry
International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Technology (IJSAT)
A field experiment was carried out at the Agronomy Farm, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the kharif-1 season of 2009to study the effect of intercropping summer mungbean with maize on the fodder and grain yield productivity under different planting geometry. Sole maize and the mungbean were grown using spacing 75 × 25 cm and 30 × 10 cm respectively. In the intercropping treatments, maize was grown in paired row using varying spacing of 25-37.5cm leaving inter-paired-rows space of 85-112.5 cm for sowing mungbean rows (2-4). Results showed that both the sole maize and mungbeanfound the highest per plant values in most of the plant parameters studied. The treatments did not show appreciable difference of maize due to the varying row arrangements. Maize fresh weight/ha and mungbean seed yield/ha decreased drastically by 33-56% and 50-81% respectively. The sole maize showed significantly the highest values of yield and yield attributes. Among the intercropping treatments with 25 cm apart maize paired rows leaving 85 cm space between paired rows accommodated with 2-3 rows of 25 cm apart mungbean gave comparatively higher values of yield and yield parameters of maize. The sole mungbean showed significantly the highest values of fodder and grain yield and also those of yield attributes. However, the intercropping treatments showed inconsistent results in respect of yield attributes.
Impact of mungbean–maize intercropping on growth and yield of mungbean
The influence of different intercropping treatments on yield and yield components of mungbean was investigated at the New Developmental Farm of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University Peshawar. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications, and comprised of five treatments viz, sole mungbean, maize + 1 row of mungbean simultaneously seeded, intercrop maize + 2 rows of mungbean simultaneously seeded, intercrop maize + 1 row of mungbean delay seeded by 3 weeks, intercrop maize + 2 rows of mungbean delay seeded by 3 weeks. The treatments significantly affected nodules plant -1 , nodule dry weight, pods plant -1 , number of grains pod -1 , thousand grain weight, grain yield and biological yield; though the impact was non-significant on weeds fresh and dry biomass parameters. Highest number of nodules plant -1 (9.87), nodules dry weight (2.10 g), number of pods plant -1 (17.32), number of grains pod -1 (4.23), thousand grain weight ( 39.33 g), biological yield (1654 kg ha -1 ) and grain yield (525 kg ha -1 ) of mungbean was recorded in plots where sole mungbean was cultivated as compared to intercropping with maize in all combinations. In conclusion, the sole cultivation of mungbean was the most effective intercropping system in terms of yield and yield components of mungbean crop.
Evaluation of Yield and Yield Components in Intercropping of Maize and Green Bean
2016
Intercropping cultivation of cereal-legume is the most common method in intercropping cultivation. In order to evaluation yield and yield components in intercropping of maize and green bean, an experiment was conducted as split plot design in completely randomized blocks with three replication in crop year 2008-2009 in Macco, Iran. The main factor included three density levels (D1: 60000 plants of maize + 200000 plants of green bean per hectare, D2: 75000 plants of maize + 300000 plants of green bean per hectare and D3: 90000 plants of maize + 400000 plants of green bean per hectare, respectively). The sub factor included five planting arrangements (R1: pure cultivation of green bean, R2: pure cultivation of maize, R3: intercropping %50 green bean + %50 maize, R4: intercropping %75 green bean + %25 maize and R5: intercropping of %25 green bean + %75 maize, respectively). The method used of from the mixture was based on replacement system. Examined traits in this study consist of mai...
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change
The current study evaluated the impact of intercropping Cowpea and Moong bean on Maize yield and its constituent parts. Nine different treatments were used in the experiment viz., (T1) sole Maize, (T2) sole Cowpea, (T3) sole Moong bean, (T4) Maize + Cowpea (1:1), (T5) Maize + Cowpea (1:2), (T6) Maize + Cowpea (1:3), (T7) Maize + Moong bean (1:1), (T8) Maize + Moong bean (1:2) and, (T9) Maize + Moong bean (2:1) in a randomized block design with three replications in Kharif season. The findings showed that intercropped plants had greater potential and produced higher values for the majority of the studied criteria, including plant height, chlorophyll meter reading (SPAD) number of cobs plant-1, number of rows cob-1, number of grains row-1, 100-grain weight, and straw and grain yields Intercrop’s seed yields were less in intercropped treatments than sole Maize. (T5) Maize + Cowpea (1:2) was best treatment having highest yield (5915.83 kg ha-1), maximum LER (1.8) and MEY (kg ha-1) (11...
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2016
This study was carried out to determine the performance of haricot bean varieties in the intercropping with maize hybrid. It was designed as RCBD design having three replications. The experimental materials were including 4 haricot bean varieties (Awash Melka, Awash-1, Dimtu and Nasir) and one maize hybrid (BH-540). Analysis result revealed that there is a significant difference among the haricot bean for the grain yield in the over all of two locations. It also showed that all the varieties showed comparative yield advantage if they will be intercropped with maize hybrid (BH-540) than the sole cropping system. The highest land equivalent ration was obtained by Dimtu (1.64). This indicated that 64 % more efficient to use Dimtu in the intercropping with BH-540 hybrid than the sole cropping system. Moreover, the relative yield advantage for Dimtu in the intercropping obtained 5817 kg/ha. It can be drawn a conclusion that using of intercropping system for the varieties used in the study will have yield advantage than the sole cropping system. The bean varieties which were intercropped with maize hybrid showed significant different for most of the traits such as days to flowering, Plant height, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant and hundred seed weight. But all of the traits for Maize showed no significant difference for all varieties in the intercropping as well as for the sole one. This indicates that bean yield in the intercropping varies with the bean varieties used. Therefore, it is important to find a compatible variety of bean to increase production in the bean-maize intercropping.
SAARC Journal of Agriculture, 2016
Field experiment was conducted at Instructional Farm, Jaguli (Mohanpur), Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India during two consecutive summer seasons of 2010-11, and 2011-12. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design having 4 levels of irrigationrainfed without mulch, rainfed with mulch, irrigation at IW (depth of irrigation water) / CPE (Cumulative pan evaporation) ratios of 0.5 and 0.75 in main-plot and 4 inter cropping systems, sole maize, sole mungbean, maize + mungbean (1:1 row ratio) and maize + mungbean (3:2 row ratio) considered as sub-plot treatments replicated thrice. Results revealed that application of irrigation and intercropping systems markedly influenced the growth, yield and yield components (number of cobs/plant, number of grains/cob in case of maize and number of pods/plant and number of seeds/pod in case of mungbean) where the maximum value of these components were recorded with the application of irrigation at IW/CPE ratio 0.75 in sole crop. Maize-mungbean in 3:2 row ratio yielded higher than that of 1:1 intercropping system which might be due to less light interception and more competition for water and nutrition between both the crops. CU of water increased with the increasing levels of irrigation and the maximum value (17.75 kg ha-1 mm-1) of WUE (water use efficiency) was observed with irrigation at IW: CPE ratio 0.75 under intercropping system of maize : mungbean in 3:2 row ratio followed by IW: CPE ratio 0.50. Among the sole crop, maximum WUE was with IW/CPE ratio 0.75 might be due to more consumption of water corresponding to production potential of maize, while, it was more under rainfed with mulch in mungbean. The relative crowding coefficient (RCC) also revealed both the intercropping systems were advantageous and the land equivalent ratio (LER) increased with the level of irrigation.
Evaluation of Sequential Intercropping of Maize with Common bean followed by Chickpea
2020
Food insecurity is increased by adverse weather condition. Intercropping has been practiced traditionally by small-scale farmers in the tropics. The key to sustainable agriculture probably lies in increased output per unit area. Hence, this research aimed to improve the productivity through sequential intercropping of maize with common bean followed by chickpea. A field experiment was conducted in Cheha district of Guraghe zone in 2017 and 2018 cropping seasons. Six treatments (sole maize, sole common bean, sole chickpea, intercropping of maize with common bean, maize with chickpea and sequential intercropping of maize with common followed by chickpea) in RCBD with three replications. The grain yield of maize was not significantly affected due to intercropping. All the intercropping involved in this study were advantageous over sole cropping. The highest yield advantage was recorded due to the sequential intercropping of maize with common bean followed by chickpea. Hence, in the are...
Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays) as Influenced by Intercropping of French Bean and Soybean
Agricultural Reviews
Background: The intercropping of maize with legumes is beneficial in multifaceted aspects. Advantages of maize-legume intercropping is pronounced in the form of higher yield and greater utilization of available resources, benefits in weeds, pests and disease management, fixation of biological nitrogen by legumes and transfer of nitrogen to associated maize and control of erosion by covering a large extent of ground area. The current investigation aimed to study the effect of maize-French bean and maize-soybean intercropping on growth and yield of maize under rainfed condition of Namsai district of Arunachal Pradesh. Methods: The field experiment was conducted during 2021 in randomized block design consisting of 3 treatments i.e. T1- sole maize, T2- maize + French bean and T3- maize + soybean with four replications. Observations on growth and yield parameters and yield of maize were recorded on harvesting of the crop. The results were analysed using standard statistical procedures of...
Evaluation of Grain Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.) and Soybean (Glycine max L.) Instrip Intercropping
In order to study effects of strip intercropping on grain yield of maize and soybean, an experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with nine treatment and three replications at the research field of Agricultural department of zanjan University in 2010. Strip intercropping planting patterns included: 2maize+2soybean rows (2:2), 2maize+4soybean rows (2:4), 2maize+6soybean rows (2:6), 3maize+4soybean rows (3:4), 3maize+6soybean rows (3:6), 4maize+4soybean rows (4:4), 4maize+6soybean rows(4:6) and sole cropping of maize and soybean. Results indicated that maximum seed yields of soybean (2261 kg/ha) and maize (10390 kg/ha) were obtained in planting patterns of 2:6 and 3:4, respectively. The results showed that the intercropping treatments have significant effects on maize grain yield, mean number ear/plant, mean number of seed/ear and mean weight of maize. Furthermore, intercropping treatments showed a significant effects on grain yield, mean no of pod/plant, mean no of seed/pod and seed weight of soybean. The maximum evaluation for simple land equivalent ratios (LER)for strip intercropping planting pattern of 3:6 was 1.67,thatindicates intercropping has advantages over sole-cropping. Evaluation of each treatment using LER too showed advantages of intercropping systems compared to sole-cropping systems.