Strategies and mechanisms to enable dialogue agents to respond appropriately to indirect speech acts (original) (raw)
Abstract
Humans often use indirect speech acts (ISAs) when issuing directives. Much of the work in handling ISAs in computational dialogue architectures has focused on correctly identifying and handling the underlying non-literal meaning. There has been less attention devoted to how linguistic responses to ISAs might differ from those given to literal directives and how to enable different response forms in these computational dialogue systems. In this paper, we present ongoing work toward developing dialogue mechanisms within a cognitive, robotic architecture that enables a richer set of response strategies to non-literal directives.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (18)
- J. Searle, "Indirect speech acts," in Syntax and Semnatics, 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole and J. Morgan, Eds., 1975.
- P. Grice, "Logic and conversation," in Syntax and Semnatics, 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole and J. Morgan, Eds., 1975.
- P. Brown and S. C. Levinson, Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
- C. Nass, J. Steuer, and E. Tauber, "Computers are social actors," in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence. ACM, 1994, pp. 72-78.
- G. Briggs, T. Williams, and M. Scheutz, "Enabling robots to un- derstand indirect speech acts in task-based interactions," Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 6, pp. 64-94, 2017.
- C. R. Perrault and J. F. Allen, "A plan-based analysis of indirect speech acts," Comput. Linguist., vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 167-182, July 1980. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=972537.972540
- E. A. Hinkelman and J. F. Allen, "Two constraints on speech act ambiguity," in Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ser. ACL '89. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1989, pp. 212-219. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/981623.981649
- S. Wilske and G.-J. M. Kruijff, "Service robots dealing with indirect speech acts," in IROS'06, 2006, pp. 4698-4703.
- G. Briggs and M. Scheutz, "A hybrid architectural approach to understanding and appropriately generating indirect speech acts," in Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2013.
- G. N. Leech, The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press, USA, 2014.
- H. H. Clark and D. H. Schunk, "Polite responses to polite requests," Cognition, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 111-143, 1980.
- R. W. Gibbs Jr and R. A. Mueller, "Conversational sequences and preference for indirect speech acts," Discourse Processes, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101-116, 1988.
- R. W. Gibbs Jr, "What makes some indirect speech acts conventional?" Journal of memory and language, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 181-196, 1986.
- S. Gupta, M. A. Walker, and D. M. Romano, "How rude are you?: Evaluating politeness and affect in interaction," in Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. Springer, 2007, pp. 203-217.
- C. A. Miller, P. Wu, and H. B. Funk, "A computational approach to etiquette: Operationalizing brown and levinson's politeness model," Intelligent Systems, IEEE, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 28-35, 2008.
- G. Briggs and M. Scheutz, ""Sorry, I Can't Do That": Developing Mechanisms to Appropriately Reject Directives in Human-Robot In- teractions," in AAAI Fall Symposium Series: Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction, Arlington, VA, 2015, pp. 32-36.
- J. F. Allen, D. K. Byron, M. Dzikovska, G. Ferguson, L. Galescu, and A. Stent, "Toward conversational human-computer interaction," AI magazine, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 27, 2001.
- F. Gervits, G. Briggs, and M. Scheutz, "The Pragmatic Parliament: A Framework for Socially-Appropriate Utterance Selection in Artificial Agents," in 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, London, UK, 2017.