Enhancing the Strategic Capability of the Army: An Investigation of Strategic Thinking Tasks, Skills, and Development (original) (raw)
Related papers
Exploring Strategic Thinking: Insights to Assess, Develop, and Retain Strategic Thinkers
This research product provides a thorough examination of the question: "How can the Army assess, develop, and retain strategic thinkers?" Expert input from within and outside the military provide a variety of perspectives that highlight areas of convergence and divergence, as well as, exemplar techniques, processes and insights that inform and change the conceptualization and practice of strategic thinking in the military. This compendium does not provide the answer to all of the Army's strategic thinking challenges, but it does provide many possible avenues to explore with the goal of enhancing the Army's strategic thinking capabilities.
Why is strategic thinking so difficult to cultivate within organisations? It is a general observation that organisations rely on either the emergence of strategic thinkers within the organisations or poaching proven strategic thinkers from other successful organisations. Public organisations, like the military, are often restricted in their potential pool of strategic thinkers. Would it not make more sense to grow a strategic thinking capability as one would build an offensive or defensive capability? That is the inputs and outputs of a strategic thinking capability are predictable and robust over time. This paper hopes to further our understanding of strategic thinking and strategic thinkers through original research and modelling. It will explore the contemporary understanding of strategic thinking from both a business and military point of view. It will then describe the significant characteristics of a strategic thinker that are measurable and developable. Finally, it will propose a capability development model for strategic thinking.
Strategic Planning in the Military
Long Range Planning, 2000
This is an account of the US Naval Security Group Command's (NSG) search for strategic management during a time of unprecedented change. In response to dramatic shifts resulting from the end of the Cold War, Congressional pressures for cross-service cooperation , and the emergence of new technologies, the NSG engaged in a six-year strategic planning process. The process helped the group refocus and develop strategies better suited to new demands for military preparedness. The process was incremental and eclectic; early leadership came from middle managers, rather than top of®cials. The process began with a`quick and dirty' planning session initiated by department heads to deal with an immediate crisis and gained momentum and top-level involvement as the ®rst session and subsequent strategic planning efforts showed results. The process was guided by a strategic planning framework speci®cally designed for public and non-pro®t organisations and relied on a variety of strategic planning tools and techniques, including stakeholder analyses, SWOT analyses and capturing the insights gained from scenario planning using the newer cognitive methods such as cognitive and oval mapping. This article provides a chronology of events over a sixyear period, explores some of the strategic planning tools and techniques used, details results achieved and discusses some of the major lessons learned.
Prospects for Strategic Thinking and Innovation: A Survey of War College Students
A major goal of senior service education is the development of leaders able to think critically and innovatively at the strategic level. Each year the various Senior Service War Colleges in the United States graduate hundreds of senior leaders who are encouraged to bring their newly refined intellectual skills back to their individual areas of government service. But, will War College graduates return to find their enhanced thinking styles welcomed or will they become frustrated by intellectual contributions devalued or ignored? This research project explores the positive and negative expectations of U.S. Army War College students enrolled in the Class of 2006 through a web based survey. It explores the reasons for their expectations, and suggests how to achieve competitive advantage through fostering a culture and climate supportive of critical, innovative and strategic thinking.
Strategic Leader Development for a 21st Century Army
STRATEGIC LEADER DEVELOPMENT FOR A 21ST CENTURY ARMY by MAJOR James M. Hardaway, U.S. Army, 43 pages. As the nature of warfare evolves, the Army must produce leaders who comfortably interact with diverse populations and embrace complexity. This emerging truth dictates a need for change in how Army officers are trained and selected to lead at the highest levels in order to regain the initiative in managing today's fluid operational environment. The concept of strategic leadership, therefore, must be examined closely in Army doctrine. Social, cultural, and complex problem-solving skills are becoming a priority and must be developed in young officers to provide enough knowledge for senior leaders to leverage later in their careers. Rarely does the typical Army career prepare someone to succeed in the strategic arena where the non-military elements of national power carry greater effects than large numbers of troops and equipment.
Managing Complex Problems: A Synthesis of Research on Army Design Methodology and Strategic Thinking
2020
This report describes a synthesis of findings from ARI's research program on design and strategic thinking. A systematic examination of ten research reports was conducted to identify key insights that emerged across the research efforts. Findings, implications, and recommendations for the Army include: using an alternative framework like "managing complex problems" to communicate the concepts of design and strategic thinking to operational forces; providing Soldiers with practical tools and resources that support managing complex problems; expanding the set of skill-building exercises that allow Soldiers to practice key skills and core activities associated with managing complex problems; assessing skills and activities associated with managing complex problems; taking steps to evolve the organizational culture to be more supportive of the mindsets, behaviors, and skills associated with design and strategic thinking. 15. SUBJECT TERMS Army Design Methodology; strategic thinking; self-development, problem solving 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 46 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Dr Angela Karrasch a. REPORT
Strategic management for the Defense Department
1988
This report describes the work done to date on the first year of a three year project designed to upgrade the education of military officers in the field of strategic planning and management. The initial section of the report covers the genesis of the project, the thesis of the research, and the use of the terms "strategic management" and "strategic planning." The second section of the report summarizes some of the current conditions within DoD that make application of strategic management/planning difficult. The final section of the report outlines the reform efforts of the faculty of the Naval Postgraduate School to respond to the current conditions and to initiate curriculum change. Efforts to date have involved the overhaul of two capstone seminars and the writing of student reports, which will be eventually turned into case studies in strategic planning and strategic management. Planned actions over the next two years also are summarized.
What is Strategic Design? Cultivating Cognitive Agility for the Craft of Generalship
SheJi, 2022
This article presents the philosophy of strategic design as a reflexive practice for generalship in defense and security organizations. We present strategic design as a distinctive aspect of generalship which enables defense practi- tioners working at the strategic level to address the kind of complex security challenges facing military leaders and decision makers in the 21st century. Our approach in this article combines unique first-hand insights from the co-instructor of the Israeli Defense Forces Generals’ Course, cross-cultural expertise on socialization of knowledge in defense and security settings, and elements of narrative and critical theory relevant to military design practice. We advocate cognitive agility as a critical mindset for defense leaders who need to generate transformative potential in an era of wars with no end. To illustrate a model of cognitive agility for generalship, we unpack some of the more esoteric aspects of the “Z model” of strategic design inquiries. The key to the Z model are the concepts of self-disruption, the strategic effective- ness of storytelling, and the principle of leveraging real-world operations as the expression of epistemology in a
The Experience of Strategic Thinking in a Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous (VUCA) Environment, 2014
This qualitative, phenomenological research study addressed the research question: What is the experience of leaders when they think strategically in a VUCA environment? The study explored what happens when leaders think strategically in a VUCA environment and how such thinking occurs. Of specific interest were the triggers of strategic thinking, the strategic questions being asked, and the methods used to develop insight. The term VUCA stands for volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity and is used interchangeably in this study with the term “complex” to represent the Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition program management environment (Army,1998). Ten acquisition program managers and deputy program managers for major DoD acquisition programs were selected as referred by naval aviation acquisition program executive officers. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and transcribed to capture the program managers’ lived experience and the meaning they made (Seidman, 2006). Data were analyzed and themes developed using Moustakas’s (1994) modification of the Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method as a guide. The study had four findings: (1) strategic thinking utilizes an extensive range of knowledge, abilities, and conditions that enable clarity of thought; (2) strategic thinking occurs deliberately as both a high-level creative and a tactically grounded process; (3) strategic thinking is fueled by iterative individual and group analytical and dialogical activities to address the knowledge needed to create strategic-to-tactical linkages and frameworks; and (4) strategic thinking is a deeply personal experience that evokes a wide range of positive and negative emotions. The study concluded that strategic thinking is a cognitive, emotional, and behavioral phenomenon that is both high-level and tactically grounded and is fueled by individual and group analytical and dialogical activities to address needed knowledge, enable clarity of thought, and create strategic-to-tactical linkages and mental models to develop enabling strategies. Further, the characterization of the VUCA environment needs to include the structural elements that may impede the ability to adapt and respond, and the triggers for strategic thinking need to include having the explicit responsibility to think strategically. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are offered.