The Life and Legacy of Constantine (original) (raw)
The transformation from the classical period to the medieval has long been associated with the rise of Christianity. This association has deeply influenced the way that modern audiences imagine the separation of the classical world from its medieval and early modern successors. The role played in this transformation by Constantine as the first Christian ruler of the Roman Empire has also profoundly shaped the manner in which we frame Late Antiquity and successive periods as distinctively Christian. The modern demarcation of the post-classical period is often inseparable from the reign of Constantine. The attention given to Constantine as a liminal figure in this historical transformation is understandable. Constantine's support of Christianity provided the religion with unprecedented public respectability and public expressions of that support opened previously unimagined channels of social, political and economic influence to Christians and non-Christians alike. The exact nature of Constantine's involvement or intervention has been the subject of continuous and densely argued debate. Interpretations of the motives and sincerity of his conversion to Christianity have characterized, with various results, explanations of everything from the religious culture of the late Roman state to the dynamics of ecclesiastical politics. What receives less-frequent attention is the fact that our modern appreciation of Constantine as a pivotal historical figure is itself a direct result of the manner in which Constantine's memory was constructed by the human imagination over the course of centuries. This volume offers a series of snapshots of moments in that process from the fourth to the sixteenth century.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Creating new Constantines at the end of the sixth century
Historical Research, 2012
The emperor Constantine I (d. 337) was important not only during his reign, but also in the following centuries when he was taken as a political role model by several Roman emperors and barbarian kings. This article looks at two of those barbarian kings: Clovis, king of the Franks at the end of the fifth and the beginning of the sixth century, and Reccared, king of the Visigoths (d. 601). Both of these kings converted to Catholicism, and both were compared with Constantine. This article analyses the meanings of these comparisons in the political, religious and ideological contexts of the Frank and Visigothic kingdoms. Procedit novos[us] Constantinus ad lavacrum (Gregory of Tours, Libri Historiarum X, 2.31, on Clovis) renovans temporibus nostris antiquum principem Constantinum magnum (John of Biclar, Chronicon, 91, on Reccared) * This article forms part of the national research projects HUM2007-61826 and HAR2010-18991. A partial and preliminary version was read at the meeting of the North American Patristics Society held in Chicago in May 2008.The author is grateful to Chris Wickham, who read the draft of this article: his opinion has been very important in the final decision to publish it.
In the early to mid-fourth century the Roman ruler Constantine, battling his way past numerous opponents and usurpers, fought his way up to the highest Roman title of Augustus. This left him as the sole ruler over a vast empire that stretched from Britain, through Europe, surrounding the Mediterranean Sea, and into the Arabian Peninsula. Some historians considered him one of the greatest leaders that Rome had ever seen; others saw him as the worst. He brought numerous political and religious reforms to the empire and one of his first was to make a declaration of equality towards the still fairly young Christian church, cease the major persecutions that were affected upon them by his predecessor, and usher in an era of peaceful existence. For this, he was held high in the eyes of the Christians and eventually himself made the leap from Pagan to Christian by converting to the religion, or did he?
From Sinner to Saint? Seeking a Consistent Constantine
This article is part of a retrospective on Constantine on the 1700 anniversary of the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. After reviewing recent Constantinian research it argues that the emperor can best be understood using the Augustinian/Lutheran paradigm of "simul iustus et peccator". The article appeared in "Rethinking Constantine: History, Theology, and Legacy," E. Smithers, ed., (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2014), pp. 5-25.
Constantine the Great (285-337) was the Roman Emperor from 307 to 337. In these thirty years as Emperor of the Roman Empire he made two important decisions whose repercussions are still felt today. One was his conversion to Christianity, becoming the first Roman Emperor to do so, and making Catholicism the official religion of the Roman Empire. The second great decision was the move of the capital from Rome to Constantinople.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.