A bibliometric study of the publication patterns of institute for agricultural research scientists in Nigeria (original) (raw)
Related papers
This paper seeks to investigate the factors that enhance scholarly publishing among researchers using three agricultural research institutions in Ilorin, Kwara State of Nigeria. The research identified factors such as motivation or incentives, training, collaboration, etc as important factors that can either influence scholarly publishing positively or negatively. A response from 120 researchers was analyzed to establish why researchers in the three Institutes engage in research and scholarly publishing, and the factors that influence their research and scholarly publishing. The result of the analyses shows that scholarly publishing is greatly enhanced by incentives, availability and accessibility of information, collaboration, training, and computer literacy.
This paper discusses bibliographic characteristics of research articles that appear in the Nigerian Institute of Agricultural Engineering (NIAE) proceedings between 2000 and 2010, covering a period of 10 years accumulation. It spelt out the number of research articles published in NIAE proceeding every year between the stated periods and also the specific areas covered in the field of agricultural engineering, appraises the pattern of authorship, institutional spread of articles, academic and gender status of the authors. The methodology adopted was mainly documentary. Using the above parameters, a total number of 589 articles were published in the NIAE proceedings in the period under study where farm power and machinery have the highest research articles i.e. 25% of the total articles published in the proceedings. University have a total number of 795 authors representing 60.40% in the analysis of degree of institutional spread of authors followed by research institutes with 266 authors representing 20.2%. One thousand, two hundred and ninety one (1291) authors' academic status was not indicated. 10
The purpose of this paper is to investigate through citation analysis, the types of information resources Nigerian agricultural science researchers (with particular reference to animal health and production) use in their scholarly communication process. The design of the study is a citation analysis approach. Two main line journals in animal health and production namely; Nigerian Journal of Animal Production and Nigerian Veterinary Journal were used for this study. All the volumes of these journals for a period of seven years were used for the study. References in these journals were harvested and used for the analysis. There were a total of 8328 citations harvested from the journals out of which 58% of them are journal citations and books and monographs accounted for 24%. The findings also reveal that more than 31% of the cited sources were published between 1991 and 2000 while 25.9% were published from 1981 to 1990. Materials of 2001 to date constituted 20.2%. There is also a very low citation to electronic sources which would have provided citations to more current materials. Similarly, authorship pattern reveals that multiple authors dominate the cited sources. About 21 journals were identified as the most frequently cited journals while most frequently researched animal is poultry. The age of the cited sources suggests that the researchers lack access to current research and therefore has a lot of policy implications to Nigerian university libraries in terms of subscribing to current journals in the libraries with emphasis on the identified frequently cited journals. This is a fundamental study with interest in identifying the sources of information for Nigerian researchers interested in animal health and production, the volume of research in the area, authorship pattern and the most consulted journals in the area.
2021
This study is based on the bibliometric analysis on research productivity of Academic Staff in the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta. The main objectives of the study are to determine the publication output of academic staff in the College of Animal Science and Livestock Production from 2005-2019 to ascertain the impact factor of their academic staff research output, to determine the academic staff publication trend from 2005-2019 and to ascertain the citations of the academic staff research publication. Data was collected from Google Scholar database using Hazing's Publish or Perish software. Literatures written within a period of fourteen (14) years from 2005-2019 were perused. The study consisted of a total number of 63 academic staff of the college. Data collected were analyzed and presented using tables, charts and graphs for interpretation. The study revealed the number of publications, years of publication, number of citations and the impact factor of each staff. The study as well made outstanding recommendations which included making sure that reports are generated using bibliometric tools in order to ascertain the contribution of the academic staff in scholarly communications and supporting research outcome and productivity through the provision of adequate facilities and materials, to facilitate the dissemination of scholarly communication.
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION (2008-2017) : A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY
Indian Jourrnal of Information Library and Society, 2018
The present study aims to analyse the publication pattern of the Journal of Agricultural Extension during the period of 2008-2017 on the basis of bibliometric parameters. There are a total of 303 articles published in the journal during 10 years period i.e. 2008-2017 with 0.33 average author productivity and a maximum number of articles 47 (15.51%) published in the year 2017. The publication pattern of the journal is collaborative research and 97(32.01%) articles published in joint authorship followed by three authors with 92 (30.36%) articles publications and the average degree of collaboration is 0.9. Nigeria got the first rank with 289 contributions followed by Kenya with 3 contributions and occupied the second rank
The purpose of this paper is to investigate through citation analysis, the types of information resources Nigerian agricultural science researchers (with particular reference to animal health and production) use in their scholarly communication process. The design of the study is a citation analysis approach. Two main line journals in animal health and production namely; Nigerian Journal of Animal Production and Nigerian Veterinary Journal were used for this study. All the volumes of these journals for a period of seven years were used for the study. References in these journals were harvested and used for the analysis. There were a total of 8328 citations harvested from the journals out of which 58% of them are journal citations and books and monographs accounted for 24%. The findings also reveal that more than 31% of the cited sources were published between 1991 and 2000 while 25.9% were published from 1981 to 1990. Materials of 2001 to date constituted 20.2%. There is also a very low citation to electronic sources which would have provided citations to more current materials. Similarly, authorship pattern reveals that multiple authors dominate the cited sources. About 21 journals were identified as the most frequently cited journals while most frequently researched animal is poultry. The age of the cited sources suggests that the researchers lack access to current research and therefore has a lot of policy implications to Nigerian university libraries in terms of subscribing to current journals in the libraries with emphasis on the identified frequently cited journals. This is a fundamental study with interest in identifying the sources of information for Nigerian researchers interested in animal health and production, the volume of research in the area, authorship pattern and the most consulted journals in the area.
Journals Published in Agricultural Field in The Last Five Years Bibliometric Analysis
Today, scientific publications published in every field offer important contributions to both scientific activities and technological developments. As a matter of fact, access to information is fast and easy, and scientific activities can be observed and analyzed. The bibliometry, which performs the quantitative analysis of scientific publications, enables the analysis of publications published in a particular discipline or in all disciplines, as well as a general structure of the discipline in question. In this study, the development of agricultural and related published articles in WOS and Scopus database within five years is explained by bibliometric analysis. In this context, the results of the surveys on the subject of agriculture in WOS and Scopus were limited to five years. The obtained data were transferred to Excel and their graphics were prepared. In addition, data were analyzed in Bibexcel program for analyzing the number of authors of multi-author articles of this data. The findings were evaluated and evaluations were made about publications published in the literature related to agriculture within five years.
Scientometric analysis of the Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences
2015
A Scientometric analysis of the Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences from volume 1 to 24 covering 279 papers is reported. The journal was covering all areas of agriculture with most papers having single, two or three authors and; in a rare cases up to nine and twelve authors. The number of papers in agronomy, field crop breeding and crop protection was large and very few in agricultural education, botany and taxonomy. The number of papers per volume varies from 16 to 7 with an average of 11 papers and a total number of pages per volume varying from 189 to84 with an average of 129 pages per volume. Similarly the average number of pages per paper citations per paper was 11.8 and 10.9 respectively. The highest authorship productivity was nine.
An Analytical Study on Rating of Agricultural Research Publications
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology IJRASET, 2020
Ranking of academic and research journals are widely used in academic circles to assess the quality and impact of journals and the distribution of scientific publications have hyperbolic form. The Impact factor, Eigen factor, SCImago journal ranking, h-index are some of the evaluation tools to assess the impact and quality of journals. An academic or research journal's scoring is established over time through many other factors including citations. Over the years, many ranking systems for journals have evolved, incorporating a variety of methodologies and factors, including frequency of citation, prominence of author, etc. To estimate and evaluate the scientific results published by a scientist or quality of a journal basing on their impact factor is facilitated by the citations number of corresponding author and also journals. This approach obviously is based on a naive idea that the number of citations tells us something essential about scientific value of cited publication. Though India has published a number of journals in various branches of knowledge, most of Indian journals do not have good impact factors. In this context, the National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS) [14] of India has started rating journals published in India and abroad based on certain criteria to assess the quality and impact of the journals. It is the sole Academy that caters to professionals in the field of agriculture in India and also insisted that transparency in the evaluation process would instil greater confidence amongst professionals in the agricultural community [2]. Knowing the impact or importance of the journal will help in decision makings about whether an author will choose to submit an article to that chosen journal as it can capture a scholar's research career. A researcher's publication data often reflects his/her research interests and their social relations. Libraries and librarians also use journal rankings to make decisions about collection development [15]. This paper will analyse what are all the criteria adopted for publication of a scientific paper in agriculture and allied sciences and sources of publications and also present status of the quality of different journals.