Pamidronate for pain control in patients with malignant osteolytic bone disease: a prospective dose-effect study (original) (raw)
Related papers
Annals of Oncology, 1997
The aim of this study was to evaluate pamidronate for bone pain in a randomised double-blind trial and to evaluate the contribution of new markers of bone resorption in patients with bone metastases. Patients and methods: Fifty-two patients with painful bone metastases were randomised to receive a two-hour infusion of pamidronate 120 mg or an identical infusion of saline. Four weeks later, all patients received pamidronate 120 mg. Bone resorption markers measured included urinary calcium (uCa), hydroxyproline (Hyp), and the collagen breakdown products: NTx, Crosslaps and Free Dpd. Results: Symptomatic response during the first four weeks was seen after pamidronate, but not with placebo (P < 0.05). Quality of life was maintained with pamidronate and deteriorated after placebo (P < 0.05). Resorption markers did not decrease after placebo, but NTx and Crosslaps both decreased by 70% after pamidronate (P-0.001). A second infusion of pamidronate did not decrease resorption further, but maintained the suppression of resorption at similar levels for a further four weeks. Symptomatic response to pamidronate correlated closely with the rate of bone resorption; it was more frequent in those patients with an initial NTx value of < 2 times the upper limit of normal (17 of 27, 62%) and in those where the level of Ntx returned to normal (19 of 32, 59%), than in the patients with either high baseline values of NTx (> 2 times the upper limit of normal) or Ntx levels which failed to normalise for whom the response frequencies were 2 of 16 (13%) and 0 of 11 (0%), respectively. Conclusions: Subjective benefit after intravenous pamidronate is confirmed in this placebo-controlled study. The new bone resorption markers of collagen breakdown were able to predict clinical response to pamidronate.
Efficacy and Tolerability of Cyclical Intravenous Pamidronate in Patients with Low Bone Mass
Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2002
Oral bisphosphonates are an established mode of therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. However, many patients are unable to take them either because of poor tolerability or some established contraindications. This retrospective study describes our clinical experience with the efficacy and tolerability of cyclical intravenous pamidronate in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Twenty patients received intravenous pamidronate, as a 30-mg infusion administered intravenously over 2 h every 3 mo. All patients were maintained on calcium and vitamin D supplementation: 1000 mg of calcium and 400-800 IU of vitamin D, respectively. Bone mineral densities of the spine and/or hip were measured at baseline and within an average of 14 mo of study entry while on cyclical pamidronate. Two-thirds of patients had a significant increase in bone mineral density either at the lumbar spine or hip. Five patients (25%) developed the expected acute-phase reaction symptoms. Pamidronate constitutes an attractive alternative therapy in patients who cannot tolerate oral bisphosphonates.
European Journal of Cancer, 1995
Pamidronate is a potent biphosphonate which modulates tumour-induced osteolysis (TIO) by inhibiting osteoclastmediated bone resorption. In a phase II trial, 69 breast cancer patients with symptomatic progressive bone metastases were given infusions of pamidronate 60 mg over 1 or 4 h every 2 weeks for a maximum of 13 infusions or until progressive disease (PD) at any site. No other systemic anticancer therapy was allowed. Pain was measured using a visual analogue scale, mobility using a detailed eight-point questionnaire and analgesic intake using a six-point scale. Improvements in pain, mobility and analgesic scores occurred in 61, 50 and 30% of patients, respectively, with 33,21 and 16% achieving a 40% improvement for 28 weeks. At trial discontinuation, baseline levels of pain and mobility had improved by 27% (P = 0.001) and 20% (P = 0.004), respectively, despite a one category reduction in analgesic intake in 27% of patients. Using this relatively high dose of pamidronate, symptomatic response was independent of the number of bone metastases and also of infusion rate. The infusions were well tolerated with no major toxicities reported. Pamidronate infusions provide useful palliation for breast cancer patients with symptomatic bone metastases.
A pilot trial of intravenous pamidronate for chronic low back pain
PAIN®, 2014
a b s t r a c t Intravenous (i.v.) bisphosphonates relieve pain in conditions such as Paget's disease of bone, metastatic bone disease, and multiple myeloma. Based on positive findings from a prior case series, we conducted a randomized placebo-controlled study to assess the analgesic effect of i.v. pamidronate in subjects with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and evidence of degenerative disease of the spine. Four groups of 11 subjects (7 active, 4 placebo) were enrolled at escalating dose levels of 30, 60, 90, and 180 mg pamidronate (the latter administered as two 90 mg infusions). Primary outcomes were safety and change from baseline in average daily pain scores, recorded at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postinfusion using electronic diaries. Secondary outcomes included responder rate, daily worst pain, and pain-related interference with daily function. There were no pamidronate-related serious adverse events or other significant safety findings. A statistically significant overall treatment difference in pain scores was observed, with clinically meaningful effects persisting for 6 months in the 180 mg pamidronate group. Least squares mean changes in daily average pain score were À1.39 (SE = 0.43) for placebo, and À1.53 (0.71), À1.26 (0.81), À1.42 (0.65), and À4.13 (0.65) for pamidronate 30, 60, 90, and 180 mg, respectively (P = 0.012 for pamidronate 180 mg vs placebo). The proportion of responders, changes in worst pain, and pain interference with daily function were also significantly improved for pamidronate 180 mg compared with placebo. In conclusion, i.v. pamidronate, administered as two 90 mg infusions, decreased pain intensity for 6 months in subjects with CLBP.
Osteoporosis International, 2005
Intravenous pamidronate is frequently used for the treatment of osteoporosis in patients who cannot tolerate oral bisphosphonates. The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after 1 year of treatment with either oral alendronate or intravenous pamidronate in patients with osteoporosis. We studied 40 consecutive patients starting treatment for osteoporosis: 20 received oral alendronate 10 mg/day and 20 received intravenous pamidronate 60 mg/3 months. Patients were started on intravenous pamidronate in the case of intolerance (within 1 month of start of treatment) of an oral bisphosphonate or in the case of contraindications for an oral bisphosphonate. BMD (spine and total hip) was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the start of treatment and after 1 year. The BMD of the lumbar spine increased by 4.0% (P<0.05 vs baseline) in both groups, and the BMD of the hip increased by 3.3% and 2.9% (P<0.05 vs baseline) in the alendronate and pamidronate groups, respectively. The increases in BMD of the vertebral spine and the total hip after 1 year are comparable in the alendronate and pamidronate groups. We conclude that intravenous pamidronate can be used successfully as an alternative treatment in patients with gastrointestinal intolerance of an oral bisphosphonate.
Metabolic effects of pamidronate in patients with metastatic bone disease
British journal of cancer, 1996
We have evaluated the value of specific bone resorption markers in monitoring metastatic bone disease to define the duration of action of a single high-dose pamidronate infusion. Twenty patients received a single infusion of pamidronate 120 mg for painful bone metastases. Ten out of these 20 patients also received a second infusion. They were evaluated at baseline, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after each infusion. A composite pain questionnaire, serum and urine tests were carried out at these time points. Bone resorption markers measured included urinary calcium, hydroxyproline and two new markers: pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline. Reference values were defined by 20 healthy controls matched by age and sex. Pamidronate induced a profound fall in bone resorption with a maximal effect within the first month after therapy. Changes in urinary calcium levels were confounded by a rise of 100% in the parathyroid hormone levels. Before treatment, pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline were increased in 7...