Fair and equal assessment in postgraduate training? A future research agenda (original) (raw)

Perceptions of fairness and consistency regarding assessment and feedback in trainees experiencing a difficult or failed professional placement

The accurate assessment of trainees on placements is a crucial measure for providers of professional training, particularly at the pass/fail borderline. Professional judgements of trainees are qualitative judgements (Hawe, 2002) and consistency is primarily concerned with validity and fitness-for-purpose rather than objectivity (Bloxham & Boyd, 2007). However, students may view inconsistencies as errors or subjectivity rather than expert judgements necessarily involving tacit assumptions and legitimate differences of perspective (Copland, 2010). This perception potentially impacts on trainees' ability to engage with feedback to improve their future practice, lowers satisfaction ratings, and raises trainees' concerns about fairness and consistency of judgements. Based on research seeking to explore common themes in the embedded metaphors used by mentors in successful placement situations (Kim & Danforth, 2012), this research applies the "GPA (grade point average) perspec...

Education: The State of the Discipline: an exploration of existing statistical data relating to staff equality in UK higher education

British Educational Research Association, 2023

This report presents findings on specific aspects of the composition and employment of academic staff in the discipline of education in higher education (HE) across the UK and in each of the devolved nations: England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. The findings are informed by analysing statistical data collected by HE institutions during the academic years 2015-16 to 2019-20, as reported to the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). The study was conducted in order to gain an understanding of the state of the discipline of education in the interests of addressing inequalities. It explored where certain markers of sameness and difference – in terms of characteristics of sex, ethnicity, age, disability, religious belief and nationality – may have affected staff employment between 2015 and 2020. This included analysing the percentages of staff, the proportions of groupings, and the rate of change in employment conditions, as captured in HESA data during the period researched. This enabled the researchers to identify the differential and, where possible to ascertain, the intersectional impacts on the access, positioning, attainment, progression and attrition of education staff. Main findings are summarised below.

D7.4 How to be FAIR with your data. A teaching and training handbook for higher education institutions

2022

This handbook aims to support higher education institutions with the integration of FAIR-related content in their curricula and teaching. It was written and edited by a group of about 40 collaborators in a series of six book sprint events that took place between 1 and 10 June 2021. The document provides practical material, such as competence profiles, learning outcomes and lesson plans, and supporting information. It incorporates community feedback received during the public consultation which ran from 27 July to 12 September 2021.

Diversity in the Academy? Staff Perceptions of Equality Policies in Six Contemporary Higher Education Institutions

Policy Futures in Education, 2006

The article is based on recent research involving qualitative case studies of staff experiences of equality policies in six English, Scottish and Welsh higher education institutions (HEIs). Recent changes to UK legislation (e.g. on 'race' and disability) and a series of European Union employment directives (including on religion and sexual orientation) have caused more attention to be paid to equality policies and their implementation in higher education. The wider context for equality policies has also changed, from a predominant focus on individuals and redistributive equality policies to viewing inequality as a generic and relative concept which can be policy-mainstreamed, with greater concentration on organisational cultures and diversity and a focus on recognitional rather than redistributive approaches to inequality. The article uses the authors' recent research findings to consider how higher education institution employees who participated in the study understood notions of equality and diversity. There is a particular focus on whether different forms of inequality are seen to be interconnected, whether diversity is seen as desirable by most employees interviewed, the potential tensions and conflicts between equality policies applying to students and those concerned with staff and the visions of equitable HEIs of the future held by senior managers. It is suggested that whilst all HEIs studied had equality policies and senior managers who have benefited from equality training, nevertheless the shift away from redistributional notions of inequality (except in respect of occupational inequality) towards greater emphasis on recognitional forms, the tensions between student and staff equality issues, and the pursuit of organisational diversity may reflect a relative depoliticisation of the staff equality agenda in higher education.

Gender Discrimination in Training: a Note

British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1997

Existing research evidence generally leads to the conclusion that females are disadvantaged in terms of access to job-related training. This paper reconsiders the evidence for Australia using data collected as part of the 1993 Survey of Training and Education. The findings indicate that while men could be expected to receive more training as a result of their labour market endowments, this is more than compensated for by a gender effect in favour of women. Comparison with results from an analysis of similar data for 1989 suggests a marked change in the pattern of training in favour of women.

Evaluating Equality Approaches in Higher Education

2012

The thesis investigates the model of substantive equality and its reflection in Slovak higher education. It focuses on the opportunities of the disadvantaged groups such as ethnic minorities, women, students with disabilities and elder students to enter and pursue higher education. It examines admission, retention and curricula policies in regards to the disadvantaged groups in order to derive to what extent the universities apply principles of equal treatment, equal opportunities and promoting diversity. The findings show that while the accession policies strongly apply equal treatment and disability is the only category for providing equal opportunities. Different situation is seen in the retention policies which offer more space for considering students' different backgrounds and show greater extent of substantive equality. Nevertheless, the findings reveal that although the idea of substantive equality is applied in Slovak universities by providing social welfare to the disadvantaged students, its scope is largely limited to the socioeconomic background and disability. Therefore, the limitation of the substantive equality in higher education in Slovakia is that it does not acknowledge any other disadvantages for providing positive action. As in terms of promoting diversity through curricula, Slovak higher education is very responsive towards the programs that address the issues of disadvantaged students.

Equality Awareness inTeacher Education and Training in Northern Ireland

2003

In the tender for this project, the Equality Commission outlined evidence which shows that many teachers within Northern Ireland have an under-appreciation of equality issues as they relate to pupils' learning and their own practice within classrooms. Such research evidence also suggests that teachers have had little exposure to these issues in either their initial teacher training or their continuing professional development. This differential exposure to equality issues thus ensures an imbalance and, in most cases, a continued lack of understanding of the impact of equality issues on teachers' own practice and professional development and thereby on the educational achievement of their pupils.

Statistics for equal opportunities in higher education: Final Report to HEFCE, SHEFC, HEFCW

This report gives the findings and conclusions of a project looking at the availability and use of statistics on discrimination and equality of employment opportunity in the higher education sector, considering both academic and non-academic staff. This represents a small part of a wider programme funded by the three Higher Education Funding Councils exploring how best to monitor the higher education sector in order to avoid discrimination and facilitate the dissemination of good practice.

What is wrong with assessment in postgraduate training? Lessons from clinical practice and educational research

Medical Teacher, 2013

Workplace-based assessment is more commonly given a lukewarm than a warm welcome by its prospective users. In this article, we summarise the workplace-based assessment literature as well as our own experiences with workplace-based assessment to derive lessons that can facilitate acceptance of workplace-based assessment in postgraduate specialty training. We propose to shift the emphasis in workplace-based assessment from assessment of trainee performance to the learning of trainees. Workplace-based assessment should focus on supporting supervisors in taking entrustment decisions by complementing their ''gut feeling'' with information from assessments and focus less on assessment and testability. One of the most stubborn problems with workplacebased assessment is the absence of observation of trainees and the lack of feedback based on observations. Non-standardised observations are used to organise feedback. To make these assessments meaningful for learning, it is essential that they are not perceived as summative by their users, that they provide narrative feedback for the learner and that there is a form of facilitation that helps to integrate the feedback in trainees' self-assessments.