Evaluating faculty performance: A practical guide to assessing teaching, research, and service (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mid-Western educational researcher, 1991
A study was done which examined one college search committee's criteria for an entry level faculty position and the characteristics of applicants to that position. The position, assistant professor of education, was advertized in the "Chronicle of Higher Education" and included nine criteria. Of the 41 applicants only one-third presented credentials in content and format that encouraged serious search committee consideration. Lack of documented expertise in the advertised area of specialization eliminated over half of the applicants from further scrutiny. Additionally, applicants that met less than half of the advertised criteria were also eliminated from the candidate pool. After this initial screening, applicants' potential for prestige (published research) and previous experience in graduate and undergraduate teaching weighed heavily in selecting candidates to be interviewed. The three candidates selected for interviews marketed themselves well: qualifications for the position were specifically and clearly articulated in the cover letter, vitae, and personalized letters of recommendation. Included are recommendations gleaned from the study including suggesting that candidates apply for positions in which they meet at least half of the criteria requested, demonstrate expertise in the area of concentration, provide good cover letters and recommendations, and offer a professional presentation of credentials. Seventeen references are included. (JB)
Community college faculty attitudes and trends, 1997
1998
The work reported herein was supported in part by the Educational Research and Development Center program, agreement number R309A60001, CFDA 84.309A, as administered by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), US Department of Education. The ...
2001
This report presents findings from the "Institution Survey" of the 1999 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF). Institutions were asked about their policies and practices related to faculty as of fall 1998. The distribution of faculty across U.S. degree-granting postsecondary institutions reflects the diversity of postsecondary education in the United States. A large proportion of all faculty, about two-fifths, worked part time, and at two-year institutions, almost two-thirds of the faculty held part-time appointments. Full-time faculty were responsible for teaching most of the undergraduate credit hours (71%), and public research institutions assigned more undergraduate credit hours to teaching assistance than any other institution type (14%). Survey results indicate that most institutions have policies for evaluating the quality of faculty instruction, and most institutions had tenure systems in place in fall 1998. As of fall 1998, 48% of all faculty had tenure at their institutions, and 19% of the remaining faculty were on tenure track. About two-fifths of institutions experienced average growth of 20% in the size of their faculty, and other two-fifths experienced no change in the number of full-time faculty from fall 1993 to fall 1998. Survey results also show that, as part of compensation packages, institutions supported a variety of benefits for their faculty in fall 1998. Many institutions provided benefits for part-time faculty, but in almost every case, the benefit was less commonly offered to part-time faculty, or the eligibility requirements were more stringent. The final chapter summarizes the characteristics of institutions of higher education by the type of institution. Three appendixes contain technical notes, a glossary, and standard error tables. (Contains 17 figures and 38 tables.) (SLD) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
Business Ethics and Leadership, 2021
This qualitative descriptive study explored what community college administrators and faculty described as being effective recruitment and retention methods for faculty at community colleges in the Northeastern United States. This study answered two research questions: what recruitment methods do administrators and American faculty at community colleges describe as being effective in the recruitment of American faculty? Also, what retention methods do administrators and American faculty at community colleges describe as being effective in the retention of American faculty? The researcher applied critical race theory to form a framework for best practices in recruiting and retaining American faculty. Data were obtained by interviewing six American faculty and surveying seven community college administrators employed at Massachusetts community colleges who were selected using purposive sampling and community college online staff directories. Using MAXQDA data analysis software, the researcher-initiated data analysis using thematic analysis. Data were organized and analyzed to identify codes, categories, and themes. Data analysis resulted in six themes: hiring processes, faculty diversity, recruitment strategies, work environment, student and faculty relationships, and retention strategies. The findings of this study can benefit community college personnel by recommending recruitment and retention strategies to effectively recruit and retain American faculty. There was limited research and data available related to the recruitment and retention of African American male faculty at community colleges. The faculty and administrator participants of this study provided rich data on effective recruitment and retention methods for African American male faculty at community colleges. The critical race theory theoretical framework was summarized. Theoretical and practical implications emerged. Based on the data and new insights, implications for future research were discussed.
Signals and Strategies in Hiring Faculty of Color
Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 2007
Her research focuses on political-economic issues of public college finance equity, efficiency, and accountability and the factors affecting student attainment in higher education. She was the principal investigator of two national research and service projects evaluating institutional assessment, effectiveness, and student success at community colleges in the United States. She received the A.B. with distinction in English literature, and the M.S. and Ph.D. in education, all from Cornell University.
Slicing the Pie: Institutional Research, Assessment, and Student Affairs Research
New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000
Student affairs research and institutional research functions often exist in different worlds, even within the same college or university. Even when these functions operate in a cooperative or collaborative mode, basic differences in perspective and purpose present challenges to optimizing their value in improving the operations and services provided by their institutions. The similarities and differences between institutional research and research in student affairs became evident when we attended the annual meeting of our state institutional research association. In the opening session, a representative of the National Center for Education Statistics discussed changes in reporting requirements, in particular, the new format for racial and ethnic reporting. Although many of the institutional researchers in the audience discussed and thought about the difficulties in counting and reporting students within various ethnic categories and how we might track these data historically, the student affairs researcher found himself thinking along very different lines. His thoughts focused on the development of racial identity as a part of overall student development. As part of acquiring an identity during college, students develop a sense of their culture and ethnicity. It is important that they be able to identify themselves culturally regardless of whether they can fit comfortably into a limited number of categories. At a session later in the day, another presenter discussed a project that assessed how many times students change majors. Once again, although the discussion focused on the significance of changing majors to enrollment reporting and management, departmental resource allocation, and student retention, the student affairs researcher found himself thinking about how
Thought Processes College Students Use When Evaluating Faculty: A Qualitative Study
American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 2010
This study explores the thought processes college students use when answering survey questions on standardized course/faculty evaluations. Thought processes are categorized as: System One or System Two, based on the framework developed by Kahneman (2003) and Stanovich and West (2000). System One processes are typically hurried, superficial, effortless, and charged with emotions. System Two processes are considered to be slower, more deliberate, thoughtful evaluations. Results from eight focus group discussions are provided. Student responses were categorized according to their adherence to System One or System Two cognitive processing. In total, 59% of the student responses were categorized as System One. Implications for faculty and higher education administrators are presented.