M. Pieniążek/P. Pavúk, From Homeric Legends to Bronze Age Realities. Changing Research Perspectives on Troy and Western Anatolia. (original) (raw)
Related papers
Despite its manifold innovations, Troy IV is to be seen as an immediate continuation of the local Early Bronze Age culture; Troy V, however, marks the transition to the Middle Bronze Age. In addition to influences from the Aegean region, in both periods various new social and technological elements make their first appearance at Troy, which show that the settlement has become more closely connected to the southeastern and central parts of Anatolia. Based on recent excavation results obtained from Troy, this paper attempts to determine the relevant interregional contacts from a more chronological perspective, with the aim of creating a broader view of the cultural developments that took place in Northwest Anatolia between ca.
The impact of early Troy on Western Anatolia is discussed by presenting the problems and opportunities experienced while attempting to establish a relative and absolute chronology for Çukuriçi Höyük, a site recently excavated in the lower Kaystros Valley. Following a short description of the settlement and its stratigraphic sequence, the discussion focuses on selected pottery assemblages from rooms 19 (phase ÇuHö IV) and 1 (phase ÇuHö III), and from parallel sites. The result of the analysis is a synchronisation of both settlement phases with Troy I, Beycesultan XIX-XVII, Aphrodisias Pekmez LC4-EB1/2, Yortan, Emporio V-IV, Thermi and Poliochni blue and the relative dating of Çukuriçi Höyük IV-III to EBA 1. An independent absolute chronology for this site is possible thanks to 10 radiocarbon dates presented here. The actual date for both phases can be fixed between 2900 and 2750 calBC, which corresponds to Troy I early in particular. In a next step, the results are used as a basis for the re-evaluation of surveys previously carried out in the Kaystros valley. Finally, the possible consequences for the chronological integration of the so-called Yortan group are discussed with the addition of recent findings from surveys conducted in the lower Kaykos Valley.
Cultural landscapes and troy; an old Anatolian settlement
Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 2010
Troy which is located on the straits dividing the continents of Europe and Asia have retained its geographical significance till prehistoric times. Troia/Troy/Truva was excavated by Schliemann, Dörpfeld and Blegen. Troy mound was formed of a series of fortified settlements built one upon another. Not only the site of Troy itself, but also the surrounding terrain has played an important role in the cultural history of mankind. It has been also one of the best known landscapes in the world since prehistoric times. According to the data obtained from the excavations, the city of Troy must have comprised a total at least 200 000m2, ranking it as one of the largest cities of its period within western Anatolia and Eagean realm. Due to the calculations based on area occupied and productivity of the region, reach about 6000-7000 inhabitants. In view of the increasing assets of natural and cultural heritage of the area, the proposals to take care of the Troy, to protect the surrounding landscape and establish a historic national park have received national support. Association with the national park of Gallipoli (Canakkale) Peninsula on the other side of Dardanelles in an integrated planning approach can be a good solution both for the protection and the sustainability of the area. In this article, the city of Troy as one of the best examples of prehistoric settlements of Anatolia was presented. Troy and its near environs was introduced with its natural, historical and cultural aspects. Settlement formation, urban development, building types, construction material and techniques, spatial organizations in the urban fabric were discussed for different layers of the settlement. And the present situation of the area was analyzed in the frame of cultural landscapes and landscape qualities.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
White painted pottery is a widespread phenomenon in prehistoric Western Anatolia both in Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age times. From the beginning, the investigations at Troy have yielded white painted fragments in the time of the Trojan first settlement in particular. Due to their relatively scarce occurrence it has been argued that the technique and style of this kind of decoration has been imported or at least influenced from outside, especially from the Yortan region where white painted vessels are known to be typical burial gifts. In this contribution all the hitherto known fragments found at Troy will be presented and discussed in the context of the emergence, distribution and development of the technique of decorating pottery with white painted ornaments in Anatolian prehistory.
W-Books Publishers, 2012
A monograph on the archaeology and, especially, the 'Nachleben' of Troy in European and Turkish / Ottoman times. Contributions include discussions of the archaeological remains at Troy, the relation between Troy and its Bronze Age neighbours (the Hittites and Mycenaeans), the language of Troy, Roman and Byznatine perceptions on the Trojan War, Ottoman interest in Troy, the Treasure of Priam, Schliemann, Attaturk and Troy, Homer and Troy in the Turkish Republic. English, Dutch and Turkish editions. Reviews: e.g. Athens Review of Books (by A. Kotsonas: http://www.academia.edu/2938794/\_Review\_of\_J.\_Kelder\_G.\_Uslu\_and\_O.\_F.\_Serifoglu\_eds.\_Troy\_City\_Homer\_and\_Turkey\_W\_Books\_Amsterdam\_2012)"