Politics of legal regimes of nuclear energy in the aspect of international security : the NPT regime, international security, nuclear terrorism and international cooperation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Reflections on the development of international nuclear law
2018
Over the course of more than seven decades, treaty norms on the production and utilisation of nuclear energy have been developed, which together form a special section within international law. These norms are the consequence of the unique nature of the field, namely that on the one hand some aspects of the uses of nuclear energy should be covered by totally new and special norms (e.g. in the field of disarmament, seeking to eliminate or at least to control the spread of nuclear weapons, and nuclear weapons tests) and on the other that several traditional legal solutions were not suitable for the problems that emerged in connection with other uses of nuclear energy (like liability).
Review of Peaceful Application of Nuclear Energy in International Law
Peaceful application of nuclear energy technology has recognized in regional, bilateral, multilateral and basic principle of International Law. However, there are substantial debates about the scope of peaceful application of nuclear activities, nuclear safety and international safeguards in preventing proliferation of nuclear weapons. The Non-Nuclear Weapon States discuss that international norms recognize all forms of peaceful application of nuclear energy which includes uranium enrichment, reprocessing and other sensitive nuclear fuel making activities. In fact, it is part of permanent right of state parties for peaceful application of nuclear energy, and sensitive nuclear activity is the continuation of non-sensitive nuclear activity. Sensitive nuclear activities should not be considered as a taboo and an excuse to exercise restrictions on inalienable right of parties to use nuclear energy for peaceful purpose because this can be considered to rewrite valid international norms and agreements. Therefore, “each country’s choices and decisions in the field of peaceful uses of nuclear energy should be respected without jeopardising their respective fuel cycle policies”. Key words: Nuclear Energy, International Law, Peaceful Application, Nuclear Weapons, Fuel Cycle Policies
The Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons: analysis of the argumentation and the International Court of Justice's decision, 2016
The end of the Cold War was marked with hopes of many nations on the final elimination of nuclear weapon (NW) that had bred fear of the total elimination of humanity. First decade after the end of competition between USA and Soviet Union witnessed multiple attempts to outlaw nuclear weapons as contrary to the principles of humanity and international peace. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) request in 1993 was rejected by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the grounds that the motion was out of the competence of this UN body. On the other hand, ICJ accepted the General Assembly’s request of 1994 to review the legality of the threat or use of NW. In the essay we will try to analyze major lines of argumentation of both sides: the ones who propose that NW is not banned by the international law and that ones that state the illegality of NW resulting from its inherent characteristics. The following analysis will provide a chance to look at the correlations between three major sources of the international law applicable to NW: international conventional, customary and humanitarian law. The paper consists of three major parts. First part is dedicated to the analysis of the argumentation of the sides. It is based on but not limited with the written statements of the representatives of USA, UK and Solomon Islands. Second part of the work deals with the examination of the advisory opinion of the ICJ. Final and concluding part provides views of the author on the argumentation in general, the Court’s decision and perspectives of the initiative to eliminate the threat of NW.
Investigating the Aspects of Nuclear Terrorism and Related International Laws
Journal of Exploratory Studies in Law and Management, 2018
Undoubtedly measures to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, if non-discriminatory and universal, will be a fundamental step towards a safer and threat-free world. However, in practice this is not the case, and the powerful governments, and at the top of them, nuclear states, by formulating treaties such as a comprehensive ban on nuclear tests and the prohibition of the production of fissile materials, seek to prevent the proliferation of these weapons and thus to monopolize their weapons. Keep the nuclear. Nuclear governments' efforts and emphasis on countering the proliferation of nuclear weapons instead of a genuine and comprehensive effort to dismantle and completely eliminate nuclear arsenals on the one hand and their widespread efforts to strengthen the Security Council's role in this regard Has made use of its powers under the provisions of the United Nations Charter to non-nuclear-weapon states. Such an approach could be a justification for expanding the interference of major powers in other countries, intensifying the excuse and shaping to prevent non-nuclear states from accessing the materials, equipment and technical know-how necessary for peaceful use of nuclear energy. Finally, it undermines the role of the UN General Assembly as the main body of the United Nations on disarmament issues.
The Issue of the Legality of Nuclear Weapons in International Law (Partial Article Translation)
Bahçeşehir University Law Review, 2019
There is no debate over the issue of power of nuclear weapons that would be capable of wiping out humanity and civilization. In fact, those who defend the legality of nuclear weapons over the assumption of that they help to maintain an international balance as a matter of deterrence policy thereby preventing a war between major powers; and those who defend the illegality of nuclear weapons with the acceptance of that these weapons render the civil-combatant distinction impossible, their usage would lead unnecessary sufferings and would violate many other international law norms, act upon the same characteristics of the weapon. This Article is an attempt to cover the issue of nuclear weapons from scientific, historical, international relations and international law dimensions. Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice given in 1996 and the distinctive characteristics of the individual opinions of all the judges will be addressed. At the end of the Article -even though it is deal within the context of nuclear weapons- “specially affected states doctrine” which is an established concept of international law will be opened for discussion and the circumstances of its first emergence and its current usage will be discussed.
EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS ON NUCLEAR ENERGY
University of Ibadan Journal of Public and International Law (UIJPL), 2019
Nuclear weapons are explosive devices designed to release nuclear energy on a large scale, used primarily as weapons of mass destruction in military applications. The first atomic bomb (ie nuclear weapon) was tested on July 16, 1945 near Alamogordo, New Mexico; and since then man can think of possibility of destruction of his race. This paper examines the international law on nuclear energy with a view to making the human race safe from the development of nuclear weapons. The library methodology -relevant textbooks, articles in journals and newspapers and internet facilities -is employed in this paper. This paper discovers that majority of the provisions of the international law lack the incisive 'bite' which is an essential requirement of law meant to curb excesses of man. The paper concludes with practical solutions to the problem such as positive review of the law regimes.
Nuclear Energy in the Twentieth Century: New International Approaches
Nuclear energy represents one of the most controversial issues in contemporary history and politics, and raises either vehement opposition or unconditional support. On the one hand, the use of nuclear technology in the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War shaped postwar discussions about the use of nuclear power, while at the same time influencing the balance of power between the two superpowers and relations inside the Atlantic bloc and with Third World countries. On the other hand, the same technology that raised fears of a potential nuclear conflict -and therefore of a Third World War and of a total annihilation of mankind -also became the object of widespread beliefs in the possibility of producing an unlimited, clean and effi-cient source of energy. This apparent contradiction between the hopes and fears of nuclear power was declined differently in different national contexts, but characterized most countries in the post-World War II period. For many, including Italy, the «nuclear euforia» of the 1950s and 1960s was strongly linked to the lack of energy resources. For others, such as Third World countries, access to nuclear power became a way of overcoming the technological gap with the developed world, and establishing their place in the international arena. In all cases, debates about nuclear policies intersected in complex ways with wider discussions about modernization and international relations 1 . Over the last twenty years, scholars have devoted an increased attention to the study
Nuclear Law: The Global Debate
Nuclear Law, 2022
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) plays a unique role in the development and implementation of international nuclear law. This chapter contains a short examination of the regime of nuclear law and its four pillars, namely safety, security, safeguards and civil liability for nuclear damage. It examines how we got to where we are and where we can take the global debate, taking into account current and emerging peaceful applications of nuclear science and technology such as advanced reactors and nuclear fusion. The chapter also contains an invitation to all stakeholders in the global community, including international organizations, non-governmental organizations, industry, academia and civil society, as well as all those that will be responsible for shaping nuclear law in the future, to let the debate and dialogue on nuclear law begin.
INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORKS ON NUCLEAR ENERGY AS TOOTHLESS BULLDOGS
Nuclear weapons are explosive devices designed to release nuclear energy on a large scale, used primarily as weapons of mass destruction in military applications. The first atomic bomb (ie nuclear weapon) was tested on July 16, 1945 near Alamogordo, New Mexico; and since then man can think of possibility of destruction of his race. This paper examines the international law on nuclear energy with a view to making the human race safe from the development of nuclear weapons. The library methodology -relevant textbooks, articles in journals and newspapers and internet facilities -is employed in this paper. This paper discovers that majority of the provisions of the international law lack the incisive 'bite' which is an essential requirement of law meant to curb excesses of man. The paper concludes with practical solutions to the problem such as positive review of the law regimes.
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: The Ban and Limits Thereof
China-USA Business Review, 2017
Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is a fact. Being a treaty, it has consequences on the intersection of diverse fields, including but not limited to nuclear physics, nuclear defense industry, peace or disarmament studies, international law and so on. Although being at such intersection itself, resembling nuclear forensics, legal issues arising out of the Treaty, e.g. the object and purpose thereof, the ban provisioned thereby and other symbolic legal problems need to be addressed in order to further assess of the significance and understand of the Treaty. In this study, it is purported to attract the attention of scientists from different fields to some key legal, social, and humanitarian issues pertaining to the Treaty, though legal doctrine itself is generally inattentive vice versa.