Effects of escitalopram/quetiapine combination therapy versus escitalopram monotherapy on hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal-axis activity in relation to antidepressant effectiveness (original) (raw)
Related papers
Impact on cortisol and antidepressant efficacy of quetiapine and escitalopram in depression
Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2014
Background: In this study, the impact of quetiapine fumarate extended release (QXR) and escitalopram (ESC) on HPA axis activity was investigated in depressed patients in relationship to antidepressant efficacy. Methods: In a randomized, open-label 5-week trial 60 inpatients suffering from major depression (DSM-IV criteria) were treated for 5 weeks with either QXR (300 mg/day) or ESC (10 mg/day). The dexamethasone/CRH (DEX/CRH) test was performed before treatment, after 1, and after 5 weeks of treatment. Cortisol (COR) AUC values were used to assess HPA axis function. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used weekly to estimate antidepressant efficacy. Results: QXR and ESC showed comparable antidepressant effects but strongly differed in their impact on HPA axis activity. In the QXR group, a marked inhibition of COR AUC levels was observed which was most pronounced after one week of treatment but showed a partial re-increase after 5 weeks of treatment. In contrast, ESC transiently stimulated COR AUC values (week 1) whereas COR AUC levels at week 0 and week 5 were comparable. COR improvement at week 1 (defined as COR peak value reduction between DEX/CRH test 1 and 2) was significantly associated with better clinical outcome. § Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00953108.
Psychopharmacology, 2006
Rationale: In healthy subjects, cortisol and ACTH secretion are acutely stimulated by reboxetine and inhibited by mirtazapine. However, it was not investigated so far whether reboxetine and mirtazapine may also differ in their impact on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis activity in depressed patients and whether these effects are related to clinical outcome. Objectives: In the present study, we investigated the impact of 5-week treatment with reboxetine or mirtazapine on the combined dexamethasone suppression/corticotropin releasing hormone (DEX/CRH) test results in depressed patients. Methods: Forty drug-free patients suffering from a major depressive episode (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria) were treated with either reboxetine (8 mg/day; n=20) or mirtazapine (45 mg/day; n=20) for 5 weeks. Before, after 1 and 5 weeks of therapy, the DEX/CRH test was performed and cortisol and ACTH concentrations were measured. Results: During reboxetine treatment, a gradual and significant reduction in HPA axis activity as measured by the DEX/CRH test was seen, which was most pronounced after 5 weeks of treatment. In contrast, mirtazapine significantly reduced the cortisol and ACTH concentrations during the DEX/CRH test within 1 week. However, after 5 weeks of mirtazapine treatment, the cortisol and ACTH responses to the DEX/CRH test partially increased again both in responders and nonresponders. Conclusions: This is the first study demonstrating differential effects of various antidepressants on the time course of serial DEX/CRH test results in depressed patients.
Antidepressants and their neuroendocrine mechanisms in depression
Previously, we have shown that in vitro antidepressants modulate glucocorticoid receptor (GR) function and expression, and have suggested that these effects could be relevant for the mechanism of action of antidepressants. To further clarify the interaction between antidepressants and glucocorticoids, we evaluated the in vitro effect of the tricyclic antidepressant, clomipramine (CMI), on the GR function in 15 treatment-resistant depressed inpatients and 28 healthy controls. Diluted whole-blood cells were incubated for 24 h in the presence or absence of CMI (10 mM). Glucocorticoid function was measured by glucocorticoid inhibition of lypopolysaccharide (LPS)stimulated interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. The results show that glucocorticoids (dexamethasone, prednisolone, cortisol and corticosterone) caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of LPS-stimulated IL-6 levels. In healthy controls, CMI decreased glucocorticoid inhibition of LPS-stimulated IL-6 levels, while this effect was not present in depressed patients. Therefore, depressed patients, who were clinically treatment resistant, also showed a lack of effect of the antidepressant in vitro. Upcoming studies shall test whether assessing the effects of antidepressants in vitro on GR function could predict future treatment response in a clinical setting.
Psychopharmacology, 2005
Rationale: A dysregulation of the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is a well-documented neurobiological finding in major depression. Moreover, clinically effective therapy with antidepressant drugs may normalize the HPA axis activity. Objective: The aim of this study was to test whether citalopram (R/S-CIT) affects the function of the HPA axis in patients with major depression (DSM IV). Methods: Twenty depressed patients (11 women and 9 men) were challenged with a combined dexamethasone (DEX) suppression and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test (DEX/CRH test) following a placebo week and after 2, 4, and 16 weeks of 40 mg/day R/S-CIT treatment. Results: The results show a time-dependent reduction of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol response during the DEX/CRH test both in treatment responders and nonresponders within 16 weeks. There was a significant relationship between post-DEX baseline cortisol levels (measured before administration of CRH) and severity of depression at pretreatment baseline. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify the impact of psychopathology and hormonal stress responsiveness and R/S-CIT concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The magnitude of decrease in cortisol responsivity from pretreatment baseline to week 4 on drug [delta-area under the curve (AUC) cortisol] was a significant predictor (p<0.0001) of the degree of symptom improvement following 16 weeks on drug (i.e., decrease in HAM-D 21 total score). The model demonstrated that the interaction of CSF S-CIT concentrations and clinical improvement was the most powerful predictor of AUC cortisol responsiveness. Conclusion: The present study shows that decreased AUC cortisol was highly associated with S-CIT concentrations in plasma and CSF. Therefore, our data suggest that the CSF or plasma S-CIT concentrations rather than the R/S-CIT dose should be considered as an indicator of the selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) effect on HPA axis responsiveness as measured by AUC cortisol response.
Brain Sciences
The effects of antidepressants on dopamine (DA) receptor sensitivity in the mesolimbic–hypothalamic system have yielded contradictory results. The postsynaptic DA receptor function was evaluated by the cortisol response to apomorphine (APO; 0.75 mg SC) in 16 drug-free DSM-5 major depressed inpatients and 18 healthy hospitalized control (HC) subjects. Cortisol response to the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was also measured. After two and four weeks of antidepressant treatment (ADT), the DST and APO test were repeated in all patients. Cortisol response to APO (∆COR) was not influenced by the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis activity, as assessed by the DST. Pre-treatment ∆COR values did not differ significantly between patients and HCs. During ADT, ∆COR values were lower than in HCs at week 2 and 4. After four weeks of treatment, among the eight patients who had blunted ∆COR values, seven were subsequent remitters, while among the eight patients who had normal ∆COR val...
Effect of the antidepressant tianeptine on the activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis
European Psychiatry, 1993
The effect of the antidepressant agent, tianeptine, on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis was studied in adult male rats under basal and stressed conditions. Chronic treatment with tianeptine (10 mg/kg; 2 weeks; twice a day) induced a significant decrease of hypothalamic CRF (-12%) and pituitary ACTH concentrations (-21%), suggesting that tianeptine reduces the activity of hypothalamic CRF neurons and pituitary corticotrophs. The possible effect of tianeptine in the neuroendocrine response to stress was thus investigated. Rats were submitted to restraint stress for 30 min; under these conditions ACTH and corticosterone levels were considerably increased. A single injection of tianeptine was found to significantly reduce stress-evoked elevations of plasma ACTH and corticosterone. Time-course experiments, consisting of administering tianeptine 1-3 h before immobilization stress, revealed that the maximum inhibitory effect of tianeptine occurs about 2 h after injection of the antidepressant. Administration of various doses of tianeptine (from 2.5 to 20 mg/kg) showed that the effect of the drug was dose-dependent; the maximum effective dose being 10 mg/kg. Taken together, these data indicate that tianeptine may exert original 'anti-stress' activity. CRF (corticotropin-releasing factor) / ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) / corticosterone / immobilization stress / 5-HT (5-hydroxytryptaminc, serotonin) / hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis / antidepressant / tianeptine
Journal of Affective Disorders, 2005
Background: It has frequently been demonstrated that experimental lowering of serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmission by acute tryptophan depletion (ATD) induces a transient depressed mood in 50-60% of patients treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) who are in remission from depression. In unmedicated depressed patients, ATD has no immediate effect on symptoms. The effects in currently depressed medicated patients have not been investigated. Methods: Fourteen currently depressed patients (seven patients treated with a selective serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitor (SSNRI); seven other treatment, non-SSNRI) received ATD in a double-blind, crossover design. Different strengths of the ATD mixture (aimed at 50% and 90% reduction of tryptophan) were used on separate days. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed at both sessions prior to, at +6.5 h, and at +24 h after ATD. Results: The ATD mixtures induced the expected reductions of plasma tryptophan levels. Full but not partial depletion improved mood and other psychiatric symptoms at +24 h in patients who received SSNRI treatment, as indicated by clinical ratings and self-report. Subjective sleep quality also improved. Conclusions: The effects of ATD on psychiatric symptoms in currently depressed patients are remarkably different from the results in recently remitted SSRI-treated patients. ATD in currently depressed patients treated with serotonergic antidepressants possibly provides important information about the mechanism of action of SSRIs. D
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 2009
According to the corticoid receptor hypothesis of depression, hyperactivity of the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system is one of the major pathophysiological factors for the development of depression and opens a broad range of new antidepressant treatment options that are related to direct interventions in HPA system regulation in depressed patients. These new therapy strategies include inhibition of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) release, antagonism at CRH1 receptors, antagonism at vasopressin V1b receptors, inhibition of cortisol synthesis, antiglucocorticoid treatment with dehydroepiandrosterone and treatment with glucocorticoid receptor antagonists. Although preclinical data support the view that CRH1 receptor antagonists are useful in the treatment of depression, currently no controlled studies are available that demonstrate clinical efficacy in depressed patients. The use of the antiglucocorticoid neuroactive steroid dehydroepiandrosterone, the cortisol synthesis inhibitor metyrapone and the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone in depression has been demonstrated in some small, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. However, three recently completed Phase III trials failed to significantly separate mifepristone from placebo in depression. Thus, it is unclear at present to what extent new, clinically effective antidepressant therapies can be developed based on the corticoid receptor hypothesis of depression.